Efficacy of biological formulations against Neoglocianus maculaalba and Dasineura papaveris in Papaver somniferum

https://doi.org/10.17221/25/2018-PPSCitation:Kolařík P., Rotrekl J., Kolaříková K. (2019): Efficacy of biological formulations against Neoglocianus maculaalba and Dasineura papaveris in Papaver somniferum. Plant Protect. Sci., 55: 123-128.
download PDF

The effectiveness of selected insecticides against capsule weevils (Neoglocianus maculaalba) and capsule midges (Dasineura papaveris), which are the main pests of breadseed poppy, was verified in a small-plot field experiment in 2015–2017. The effect of foliar application was evaluated according to boreholes on capsule surfaces caused by the feeding of capsule weevil adults and larvae numbers in capsules collected approximately 4 weeks after application. Biological efficacy of the tested biological formulations Spintor (active ingredient spinosad 240 g/l) in dosage 0.4 l/ha and NeemAzal T/S (active ingredient azadirachtin A 10.6 g/l) in dosage 3 l/ha against N. maculaalba larvae in individual years of monitoring ranged from 46.4% to 77.7% and from 67.7% to 82.9%, respectively. The effect of the formulation Prev B2 (boron ethanolamine corresponding to 2.1% of water-soluble boron) in 0.3% dosage was in the range of 59.5–81.9%. Their efficacy did not differ significantly compared to the registered chemical standards Biscaya 240 OD (active ingredient thiacloprid 240 g/l) and Decis Mega (active ingredient deltamethrin 50 g/l). Therefore, these biological insecticides are potentially useful for the effective control of N. maculaalba and D. papaveris population densities and reduction of damage they cause to breadseed poppy.

References:
Anonymus (2018): Registr přípravků na ochranu rostlin. Available at http://eagri.cz/public/app/eagriapp/POR/Vyhledavani.aspx (accessed Febr 14, 2018).
 
Bret B.L., Larson L.L., Schoonover J.R., Sparks T.C., Thompson G.D. (1997): Biological properties of spinosad. Down to Earth, 52: 6–13.
 
Cleveland Cheryl B, Mayes Monte A, Cryer Steven A (2002): An ecological risk assessment for spinosad use on cotton. Pest Management Science, 58, 70-84 https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.424
 
Gajger I.T., Bosek I., Bilandžić N., Kosanović M. (2016): The impact of neonicotinoids on pollinator insects. Veterinarska Stanica, 47: 353–363.
 
Kolařík P., Rotrekl J. (2014): Možnosti ekologické ochrany semenných porostů jetele lučního. Pícninářské listy, XX: 31–33.
 
Kolařík P., Rotrekl, J. (2015): Krytonosec makovicový a bejlomorka maková – zásady ochrany. Agromanuál, 10 (6): 32–34.
 
Kolařík P., Kolaříková E. (2015): Nové možnosti ochrany semenných porostů jetele lučního proti nosatčíkům rodu Apion. Úroda, 63(12) Scientific Annex: 47–52.
 
Kůdela V., Kocourek F., Barne M. (2012): České a anglické názvy chorob a škůdců rostlin. 1st Ed. Prague, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
 
Ma Yun-hua, Gao Zhan-lin, Dang Zhi-hong, Li Yao-fa, Pan Wen-liang (2012): Effect of temperature on the toxicity of several insecticides to <i>Apolygus lucorum</i> (Heteroptera: Miridae). Journal of Pesticide Science, 37, 135-139 https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D11-013
 
Nawrocka Bożenna (2008): The Influence of Spinosad and Azadirachtin on Beneficial Fauna Naturally Occurring on Cabbage Crops. Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin, 69, 115-124 https://doi.org/10.2478/v10032-008-0026-z
 
Pobożniak Maria, Grabowska Dominika, Olczyk Marta (2016): Effect of Orange and Cinnamon Oil on the Occurrence and Harmfulness of Thrips tabaci Lind on Onion – Preliminary Results. Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae, 19, 13-14 https://doi.org/10.1515/ahr-2016-0016
 
Rotrekl J. (2000): Zemědělská entomologie. Mendel University in Brno.
 
Rotrekl J. (2008): Ochrana máku setého (Papaver somniferum L.) před některými hmyzími škůdci. Certified methodology 2/08.
 
Rotrekl J., Kolařík P. (2011): Krytonosec makovicový (Neoglocianus macula-alba) jako významný škůdce máku setého. Úroda 5: 39–41.
 
Schmutterer H (1990): Properties and Potential of Natural Pesticides from the Neem Tree, Azadirachta Indica. Annual Review of Entomology, 35, 271-297 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.001415
 
Sparks T.C., Thompson G.D., Larson L.L., Kirst H.A., Jantz O.K., Worden T.V., Hertlein M.B., Busacca J.D. (1995): Biological characteristics of the spinosyns: new naturally derived insect control agents. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Jan 4–7, 1995, San Antonio, Texas. National Cotton Council of America, Memphis: 903–907.
 
Stanca-Moise C. (2016): Observations on the biology, ecology and ethology of the poppy weevil Neoglocianus maculaalba (Herbst, 1795) (Coleoptera, Cuculionidae) in a garden with spontaneous poppy in the city of Sibiu (Romania) under 2014 climate conditions. Analele Universităţii din Oradea, Fascicula Biologie, Short Communication, Tom. XXIII (2): 84–86.
 
Węgorek P., Zamoyska J. (2008): Current status of resistance in pollen beetle (Meligethes aeneus F.) to selected active substances of insecticides in Poland. EPPO Bulletin, 38, 91-94 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2008.01188.x
 
download PDF

© 2019 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences