Effect of sprayer parameters and wind speed on spray retention and soil deposits of pesticides: Case of artichoke cultivar


Bahrouni H., Chaabane H., Marzougui N., Ben Meriem S., Bchini H., Ben Abdallah M.A. (2021): Effect of sprayer parameters and wind speed on spray retention and soil deposits of pesticides: Case of artichoke cultivar. Plant Protect. Sci., 57: 333–343. 

download PDF

Irrational use of chemical method for crop protection, presents increasingly serious risks for human health and the environment. Droplet size and meteorological parameters are key factors to both environmental contamination and pest control efficacy. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of the nozzle use parameters, the operating pressure and the wind speed on droplet foliage deposition (retention) and soil deposition (losses), when treating artichoke. Several combinations were tested in a wind tunnel and in the field, under Mediterranean microclimatic conditions, using a fluorescent dye as a substitute for pesticide. Multiple regression models were built from tunnel data to predict foliage deposition and soil deposits, with determination coefficients of 0.96. Thus, models are able to simulate pesticide deposition on artichoke leaves and soil deposition, depending on sprayer parameters and wind speed. Foliage deposition and soil deposits rates ranged from 30 to 52% and 26 to 57% respectively for anti-drift nozzle. For conventional nozzle, rates varied from 20 to 38% and 31 to 62%. To improve retention and reduce spray losses, it is recommended to choose a medium droplet size when using an anti-drift nozzle, in conjunction with medium nozzle size, medium pressure and reduced wind speed.

Allagui A. (2019): Caractérisation de l'efficacité agroenvironnementale des traitements phytosanitaires de l’artichaut pour une gestion respectueuse de l’environnement en Tunisie. [PhD. Thesis.] Sousse, University of Sousse.
Allagui A., Bahrouni H., M'Sadak Y. (2018): Deposition of pesticide to the soil and plant retention during crop spraying: The art state. Journal of Agricultural Science, 10: 104–115.  https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v10n12p104
Bahrouni H., Sinfort C., Hamza E. (2008): Evaluation of pesticide losses during cereal crop spraying in Tunisian conditions. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Science, 4: 215–220.
Bonzanigo L., Giupponi C., Moussadek R. (2016): Conditions for the adoption of conservation agriculture in Central Morocco: An approach based on Bayesian network modelling. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 11: 24–34. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2016.665
Creech C.F., Henry R.S., Fritz B.K., Kruger G.R. (2015): Influence of herbicide active ingredient, nozzle type, orifice size, spray pressure, and carrier volume rate on spray droplet size characteristics. Weed Technology, 29: 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-14-00049.1
De Oliveira A.R. (2018): The effect of physical application parameters on herbicide efficacy and droplet size. [PhD. Thesis.] Lincoln, University of Nebraska.
Dorr G.J., Kempthorne D.M., Mayo L.C., Forster W.A., Zabkiewicz J.A., McCue S.W., Belward J.A., Turner I., Hanan J. (2014): Towards a model of spray–canopy interactions: Interception, shatter, bounce and retention of droplets on horizontal leaves. Ecological Modelling, 290: 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.002
Ferguson J.C. (2016): Towards the optimization of coarse sprays to reduce drift and improve efficacy in Australian cropping systems. [PhD. Thesis.] Brisbane, University of Queensland.
Forster W.A., Kimberley M.O., Zabkiewicz J.A. (2005): A universal spray droplet adhesion model. Transaction of The ASAE, 48: 1321–1330.  https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.19179
Gil Y., Sinfort C., Brunet Y., Polveche V., Bonicelli B. (2007): Atmospheric loss of pesticides above an artificial vineyard during air-assisted spraying. Atmospheric Environment, 41: 2945–2957.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.12.019
Lammertyn J., Aerts M., Verlinden B.E., Schotsmans W., Nicolai B.M. (2000): Logistic regression analysis of factors influencing core breakdown in 'Conference' pears. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 20: 25–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00114-9
Li J., Cui H., Ma Y., Xun L., Li Z., Yang Z., Lu H. (2020): Orchard spray study: A prediction model of droplet deposition states on leaf surfaces. Agronomy, 10: 747. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10050747 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050747
Mercer G.N., Sweatman W.L., Elvin A., Caunce J., Fulford G., Harper G. (2007): Process driven models for spray retention in plants. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Mathematics-In-Industry Study Group. Wake G. (ed.) Wellington, Nov 2006: 57–85.
Ni Z., Phillips L.D., Hanna G.B. (2011): Exploring Bayesian belief networks using Netica. In: Athanasiou T., Darzi A. (eds): Evidence Synthesis in Healthcare. London, Springer-Verlag: 293–318.
Nuyttens D., Baetens K., De Schampheleire M., Sonck B. (2007): Effect of nozzle type, size and pressure on spray droplet characteristics. Biosystems Engineering, 97: 333–345.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.03.001
Ozkan H.E. (2016): Effect of major variables on drift distances of spray droplets. Ohio State University Extension Service. Available at https://ohioline.osu.edu/factsheet/fabe-525
Peters T., Thostenson A., Nowatzki J., Hofman V., Wilson J. (2017): Selecting spray nozzles to reduce particle drift (AE1246). North Dakota State University Extension Service. Available at https://www.ag.ndsu.edu
Shaw D.R., Morris W.H., Webster E.P., Smith D.B. (2000): Effects of spray volume and droplet size on herbicide deposition and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control. Weed Technology, 14: 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0321:EOSVAD]2.0.CO;2
Teske M.E., Bird S.L., Esterly D.M., Curbishley T.B., Ray S.L., Perry S.G. (2002): AgDRIFT: A model for estimating near-field spray drift from aerial applications. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 21: 659–671. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620210327
Uyanik G.K., Güler N. (2013): A study on multiple linear regression analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106: 234–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.027
Van de Zande J.C., Butler Ellis C., Douzals J.P., Stallinga H., Van Velde P., Michielsen J.M.G.P. (2017): Spray drift reduction of the MagGrow spray system – Effect of magnetism, nozzle type, end nozzle and spray boom height. Wageningen, Wageningen University Research – WUR.
Wang F., Hu Z., Abarca C., Fefer M., Liu J., Brook M.A., Pelton R.H. (2018): Factors influencing agricultural spray deposit structures on hydrophobic surfaces. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 553: 288–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.05.074
Womac A.R., Bui J.S. (2002): Design and tests of a variable-flow fan nozzle. Transactions of the ASAE, 45: 287–295.  https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.8519
Yao C., Myung K., Wang N., Johnson A. (2014): Spray retention of crop protection agrochemicals on the plant surface. American Chemical Society Publications. In: Retention, Uptake, and Translocation of Agrochemicals in Plants. ACS Symposium Series, 1171: 1–22.
Zhu H., Dorner J.W., Rowland D.L., Derksen R.C., Ozkan H.E. (2004): Spray penetration into peanut canopies with hydraulic nozzle tips. Biosystems Engineering, 87: 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2003.11.012
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti