Differences in responses to Wheat dwarf virus infection in contrasting wheat cultivars Ludwig and Svitava
Jan Ripl, Tomáš Dráb, Sebanstien Gadiou, Jiban Kumar Kundu
https://doi.org/10.17221/57/2018-PPSCitation:Ripl J., Dráb T., Gadiou S., Kumar Kundu J. (2020): Differences in responses to Wheat dwarf virus infection in contrasting wheat cultivars Ludwig and Svitava. Plant Protect. Sci., 56: 67-73.The two contrasting cultivars, the very susceptible Ludwig and moderately susceptible Svitava, previously evaluated in field trials to determine their resistance levels to Wheat dwarf virus (WDV), were analysed by four different test methods to allow for the comparison of the methods and to consider whether the resistance level of cv. Svitava can be an effective component of wheat protection from the virus. The differences in the proportion of the diseased plants were observed after the inoculation by the viruliferous leafhoppers. The differences in the cultivar resistance levels were evaluated by comparing the biomass production after the infection. The amount of viral DNA was determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Concurrently, the cultivar response to the virus infection after the controlled inoculation by the leafhoppers [Psammotettix alienus (Dahlbom, 1850)] under field conditions was further evaluated. The infected plants of cv. Svitava produced five times more dry matter in the vegetative growth stage than cv. Ludwig. The quantitative PCR analysis confirmed the resistance in cv. Svitava. The plant inoculation under a standardised infection pressure showed that the probability of the WDV infection after the inoculation feeding is smaller in the cv. Svitava plants. The comparison of the results from the different test methods shows that the field resistance tests are necessary to obtain a proper assessment of the possibilities for the cultivars’ utilisation in the crop protection.
Wheat dwarf virus; resistance; winter wheat; cv. Ludwig; cv. Svitava
References:Impact factor (Web of Science)
2020: 1.464
Q3 – Agronomy
Q3 – Plant Sciences
5-year Impact factor: 1.834
SCImago Journal Rank (SCOPUS):
New Issue Alert
Join the journal on Facebook!
Ask for email notification.
Similarity Check
All the submitted manuscripts are checked by the CrossRef Similarity Check.
Abstracted/Indexed in
AGRICOLA
Agrindex of Agris/FAO database
Bibliographie der Pflanzenschutzliteratur (Phytomed database)
Biological Abstracts of Biosis (BIOSIS Previews database)
BIOSIS Previews
CAB ABSTRACTS
Cambridge Scientific Abstracts
CNKI
CrossRef
Current Contents®/Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
Czech Agricultural and Food Bibliography
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals),
EBSCO – Academic Search Ultimate
Elsevier Bibliographic Databases
Google Scholar
ISI Web of KnowledgeSM
J-GATE
Pest Directory database
Review of Agricultural Entomology
Review of Plant Pathology of CAB International Information Services (CAB Abstracts)
SCOPUS
Web of Science®
Licence terms
All content is made freely available for non-commercial purposes, users are allowed to copy and redistribute the material, transform, and build upon the material as long as they cite the source.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Contact
Ing. Eva Karská
Executive Editor
e-mail: pps@cazv.cz
Address
Plant Protection Science
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Slezská 7, 120 00 Praha 2,
Czech Republic