Differences in responses to Wheat dwarf virus infection in contrasting wheat cultivars Ludwig and Svitava

https://doi.org/10.17221/57/2018-PPSCitation:Ripl J., Dráb T., Gadiou S., Kumar Kundu J. (2020): Differences in responses to Wheat dwarf virus infection in contrasting wheat cultivars Ludwig and Svitava. Plant Protect. Sci., 56: 67-73.
download PDF

The two contrasting cultivars, the very susceptible Ludwig and moderately susceptible Svitava, previously evaluated in field trials to determine their resistance levels to Wheat dwarf virus (WDV), were analysed by four different test methods to allow for the comparison of the methods and to consider whether the resistance level of cv. Svitava can be an effective component of wheat protection from the virus. The differences in the proportion of the diseased plants were observed after the inoculation by the viruliferous leafhoppers. The differences in the cultivar resistance levels were evaluated by comparing the biomass production after the infection. The amount of viral DNA was determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Concurrently, the cultivar response to the virus infection after the controlled inoculation by the leafhoppers [Psammotettix alienus (Dahlbom, 1850)] under field conditions was further evaluated. The infected plants of cv. Svitava produced five times more dry matter in the vegetative growth stage than cv. Ludwig. The quantitative PCR analysis confirmed the resistance in cv. Svitava. The plant inoculation under a standardised infection pressure showed that the probability of the WDV infection after the inoculation feeding is smaller in the cv. Svitava plants. The comparison of the results from the different test methods shows that the field resistance tests are  necessary to obtain a proper assessment of the possibilities for the cultivars’ utilisation in the crop protection.

References:
Benkovics A.H., Vida G., Nelson D., Veisz O., Bedford I., Silhavy D., Boulton M.I. (2010): Partial resistance to Wheat dwarf virus in winter wheat cultivars. Plant Pathology, 59: 1144–1151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02318.x
 
Cejnar P., Ohnoutkova L.,Ripl J., Kundu J.K. (2019): Wheat dwarf virus infectious clones allow to infect wheat and Triticum monococcum plants. Plant Protection Science, 55: 81–89. https://doi.org/10.17221/42/2018-PPS
 
Cooper J. I., Jones A. T. (1983): Responses of plants to viruses: proposals for use of terms. Phytophatology, 73 : 127–128. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-73-127
 
Gadiou S., Ripl J., Jaňourová B., Jarošová J., Kundu J.K. (2012): Real-time PCR assay for the discrimination and quantification of wheat and barley strains of Wheat dwarf virus. Virus Genes, 44: 349–355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-011-0699-0
 
Habekuß A., Riedel C., Schliephake E., Ordon F. (2009): Breeding for resistance to insect-transmitted viruses in barley – an emerging challenge due to global warming. Journal für Kulturpflanzen, 61: 53–61.
 
Lindblad M., Sigvald R. (2004): Temporal spread of Wheat dwarf virus and mature plant resistance in winter wheat. Crop Protection, 23: 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.08.011
 
Lindsten K., Vacke J. (1991): A possible barley adapted strain of Wheat dwarf virus (WDV). Acta Phytopatologica et Entomologica Hungarica, 26: 175–180.
 
Little T.J., Shuker D.M., Colegrave N., Day T., Day T., Graham A.L. (2010): The coevolution of virulence: Tolerance in Perspective. PLoS Pathogens, 6(9): e1001006. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001006 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001006
 
Mehner S., Manurung B., Gruntzig M., Habekuß A., Witsack W., Fuchs E. (2003): Investigations into the ecology of the Wheat dwarf virus (WDV) in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheit und Pflanzenschutz, 110: 313–323.
 
Nygren J., Shad N., Kvarnheden A.,Westerbergh A. (2015): Variation in susceptibility to Wheat dwarf virus among wild and domesticated wheat. PLoS ONE, 10(4): e0121580.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121580 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121580
 
Pagán I., García-Arenal F. (2018): Tolerance to plant pathogens: theory and experimental evidences. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19: 810–827. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19030810
 
Råberg L. (2014): How to live with enemy: Understanding tolerance to parasites. PLoS Biology 12(11): e1001989.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001989 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001989
 
Robinson R.A. (1969): Disease resistance terminology. Review of Applied Mycology, 48: 393–606.
 
Schafer J.F. (1971): Tolerance to plant disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 9: 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.09.090171.001315
 
Širlová L., Vacke J., Chaloupková M. (2005): Reaction of selected winter wheat cultivars to autumnal infection with Wheat dwarf virus. Plant Protection Science, 41: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.17221/2732-PPS
 
Vacke J. (1961): Wheat dwarf virus disease. Biologia Plantarum, 3: 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02933566
 
Vacke J. (1971): Zakrslost pšenice. Závěrečná zpráva. Praha, Výzkumný ústav rostlinné výroby.
 
Vacke J., Cibulka R. (1999): Silky bent grass (Apera spica-venti [L.] Beauv.) – a new host and reservoir of Wheat dwarf virus. Plant Protection Science, 35: 47–50. https://doi.org/10.17221/9674-PPS
 
Vacke J., Cibulka R. (2000): Response of selected winter wheat varieties to Wheat dwarf virus infection at an early growth stage. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 36: 1–4.
 
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences