The combination of drought and heat stress has a greater effect on potato plants than single stresses T., Watanabe K. (2020): The combination of drought and heat stress has a greater effect on potato plants than single stresses. Plant Soil Environ., 66: 175-182.
download PDF

Several research groups have examined the effects of drought stress and heat stress on potato, but few investigations of the effects of combined drought-heat stress have been reported. Using five potato lines, the potato plants’ responses to drought stress, heat stress, as well as combined drought-heat stress were studied, to get the insight in phenotypic shift due to abiotic stresses. The experiment was conducted as a growth room experimental under non-stress and abiotic stresses (drought, heat, and combined drought-heat) conditions. The results demonstrated that potato plants responded to the abiotic stresses by decreasing their plant height, leaf size, cell membrane stability, and relative water content (RWC). However, increasing their leaf chlorophyll content under drought and combined drought-heat stresses. Generally, the combined drought-heat stress had a greater effect on the tested traits. The potato line L1 (84.194.30) showed the lowest level of wilting in all three types of abiotic stress, supported by a small RWC change compared to the control condition; L1 is thus considered relatively tolerant to abiotic stress. The potato lines’ different responses to each type of abiotic stress indicate that the potato lines have different levels of sensitivity to each abiotic stress.

Andjelkovic V. (2018): Introductory chapter: Climate changes and abiotic stress in plants. In: Andjelkovic V. (ed.): Plant, Abiotic Stress, and Responses to Climate Change. IntechOpen: 3−6. Available at (accessed 5.10.2019)
Arvin M.J., Donnelly D.J. (2008): Screening potato cultivars and wild species to abiotic stresses using an electrolyte leakage bioassay. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 10: 33−42.
Asthir B. (2015): Mechanisms of heat tolerance in crop plants. Biologia Plantarum, 59: 620−628.
Blum A., Ebercon A. (1981): Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Science, 21: 43−47.
Bray E.A. (1997): Plant responses to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science, 2: 48−54.
Bundy M.G.R., Thompson O.A., Sieger M.T., Shpak E.D. (2012): Patterns of cell division, cell differentiation and cell elongation in epidermis and cortex of Arabidopsis pedicels in the wild type and in Erecta. PloS One, 7: e46262.
Chen S.L., Li J.K., Fritz E., Wang S.S., Hüttermann A. (2002): Sodium and chloride distribution in roots and transport in three poplar genotypes under increasing NaCl stress. Forest Ecology and Management, 168: 217−230.
Dou H., Xv K., Meng Q., Li G., Yang X. (2015): Potato plants ectopically expressing Arabidopsis thaliana CBF 3 exhibit enhanced tolerance to high-temperature stress. Plant, Cell and Environment, 38: 61−72.
Dreesen F.E., De Boeck H.J., Janssens I.A., Nijs I. (2012): Summer heat and drought extremes trigger unexpected changes in productivity of a temperate annual/biannual plant community. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 79: 21−30.
Ekanayake I.J. (1989): Studying Drought Stress and Irrigation Requirements of Potatoes. CIP Research Guide 30. Lima, International Potato Center.
Engelbrecht B.M.J., Tyree M.T., Kursar T.A. (2007): Visual assessment of wilting as a measure of leaf water potential and seedling drought survival. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 23: 497−500.
FAO (2019): Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome, FAO Statistical Database. Available at (accessed 2.10.2020)
Guidi L., Lo Piccolo E., Landi M. (2019): Chlorophyll fluorescence, photoinhibition, and abiotic stress: Does it make any difference the fact to be C3 or C4 species? Frontiers in Plant Science, 10: 174.
Gururani M.A., Venkatesh J., Tran L.S.P. (2015): Regulation of photosynthesis during abiotic stress-induced photoinhibition. Molecular Plant, 8: 1304−1320.
Iwama K. (2008): Physiology of the potato: new insights into root system and repercussions for crop management. Potato Research, 51: 333.
Jensen C.R. (1981): Influence of soil water stress on wilting and water relations of differently osmotically adjusted wheat plants. New Phytologist, 89: 15−24.
Krannich C.T., Maletzki L., Kurowsky C., Horn R. (2015): Network candidate genes in breeding for drought tolerant crops. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16: 16378−16400.
Lamaoui M., Jemo M., Datla R., Bekkaoui F. (2018): Heat and drought stresses in crops and approaches for their mitigation. Frontiers in Chemistry, 6: 26.
Mendiburu F. (2019): Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agriculture Research. Available at:
Michel B.E. (1983): Evaluation of the water potentials of solutions of polyethylene glycol 8 000 both in the absence and presence of other solutes. Plant Physiology, 72: 66–70.
Monneveux P., Ramírez D.A., Khan M.A., Raymundo R.M., Loayza H., Quiroz R. (2014): Drought and heat tolerance evaluation in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Potato Research, 57: 225–247.
Peñuelas J., Filella I. (1998): Visible and near-infrared reflectance techniques for diagnosing plant physiological status. Trends in Plant Science, 3: 151–156.
Pérez-Harguindeguy N., Díaz S., Garnier E., Lavorel S., Poorter H., Jaureguiberry P., Bret-Harte M.S., Cornwell W.K., Craine J.M., Gurvich D.E., Urcelay C., Veneklaas E.J., Reich P.B., Poorter L., Wright I.J., Ray P., Enrico L., Pausas J.G., de Vos A.C., Buchmann N., Funes G., Quétier F., Hodgson J.G., Thompson K., Morgan H.D., ter Steege H., van der Heijden M.G.A., Sack L., Blonder B., Poschlod P., Vaieretti M.V., Conti G., Staver A.C., Aquino S., Cornelissen J.H.C. (2013): New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 64: 715–716.
Rymaszewski W., Vile D., Bediee A., Duazat M., Luchaire N., Kamrowska D., Granier C., Hennig J. (2017): Stress-related gene expression reflects morphophysiological responses to water deficit. Plant Physiology, 174: 1913–1930.
Rolando J.L., Ramírez D.A., Yactayo W., Monneveux P., Quiroz R. (2015): Leaf greenness as a drought tolerance related trait in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 110: 27–35.
Rudack K., Seddig S., Sprenger H., Köhl K., Uptmoor R., Ordon F. (2017): Drought stress-induced changes in starch yield and physiological traits in potato. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 203: 494–505.
Shah N.H., Paulsen G.M. (2003): Interaction of drought and high temperature on photosynthesis and grain-filling of wheat. Plant and Soil, 257: 219–226.
Soltys-Kalina D., Plich J., Strzelczyk-Żyta D., Śliwka J., Marczewski W. (2016): The effect of drought stress on the leaf relative water content and tuber yield of a half-sib family of ‘Katahdin’ -derived potato cultivars. Breeding Science, 66: 328–331.
Tani E., Chronopoulou E.G., Labrou N.E., Sarri E., Goufa M., Vaharidi X., Tornesaki A., Psychogiou M., Bebeli P.J., Abraham E.M. (2019): Growth, physiological, biochemical, and transcriptional responses to drought stress in seedlings of Medicago sativa L., Medicago arborea L. and their hybrid (Alborea). Agronomy, 9: 38.
Tardieu F., Parent B., Caldeira C.F., Welcker C. (2014): Genetic and physiological controls of growth under water deficit. Plant Physiology, 164: 1628–1635.
Trenberth K.E. (2005): The impact of climate change and variability on heavy precipitation, floods, and droughts. In: Anderson M.G. (ed.): Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ISBN: 9780471491033
Zandalinas S.I., Mittler R., Balfagón D., Arbona V., Gómez-Cadenas A. (2018): Plant adaptations to the combination of drought and high temperatures. Physiologia Plantarum, 162: 2–12.
Zhang Q.F. (2007): Strategies for developing green super rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104: 16402–16409.
Zhou R., Yu X.Q., Ottosen C.-O., Rosenqvist E., Zhao L.P., Wang Y.L., Yu W.G., Zhao T.M., Wu Z. (2017): Drought stress had
a predominat effect over heat stress on three tomato cultivars subjected to combined stress. BMC Plant Biology, 17: 24.
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences