The effect of seed priming on field emergence and root yield of sugar beet B., WYSZYŃSKI Z., PAČUTA V., RAŠOVSKÝ M., RÓŻAŃSKA A. (2018): The effect of seed priming on field emergence and root yield of sugar beet. Plant Soil Environ., 64: 227-232.
download PDF

The effect of sugar beet seed (primed and non-primed) on field emergence and root yield of sugar beet was examined. The experiment was realized in the years 2012–2014 at an Experiment Field Station of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW Faculty of Agriculture and Biology in Skierniewice (51°97'N, 20°19'E) in Poland. The experimental factor was diversified seed material of the same cultivar of sugar beet – typical seeds, traditionally prepared for sowing (non-primed seeds) and seeds before sowing, subjected to the process of priming. On average for the three years of the study, no significant effect of seed priming on the field emergence was found. On the other hand, the sugar beet emergence on plots with primed seeds was faster, more even and uniform. Seed priming, on average for the three years of the study, significantly increased the mean root mass during harvest. In contrast, priming the seeds did not cause an increase in the final plant density. No significant effect of seed priming on root yield was found, both on average for the studied period and in particular years of the study.

Apostolides G., Goulas C. (1998): Seed crop environment and processing effects on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) certified hybrid variety seed quality. Seed Science and Technology, 26: 223–235.
Capron Isabelle, Corbineau Françoise, Dacher François, Job Claudette, Côme Daniel, Job Dominique (2000): Sugarbeet seed priming: effects of priming conditions on germination, solubilization of 11-S globulin and accumulation of LEA proteins. Seed Science Research, 10, 243-254
Catusse Julie, Meinhard Juliane, Job Claudette, Strub Jean-Marc, Fischer Uwe, Pestsova Elena, Westhoff Peter, Van Dorsselaer Alain, Job Dominique (2011): Proteomics reveals potential biomarkers of seed vigor in sugarbeet. PROTEOMICS, 11, 1569-1580
de los Reyes B. G., Myers S. J., McGrath J. M. (2003): Differential induction of glyoxylate cycle enzymes by stress as a marker for seedling vigor in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 269, 692-698
Draycott A.P. (2006): The advantage of advantage on sugar beet? British Sugar Beet Review, 74: 13–17.
Durrant M.J., Loads A.H. (1987): Experiments to determine the optimum advancement of sugar-beet seed. Seed Science and Technology, 15: 185–196.
Durrant M.J., Mash S.J. (1990): Sugar beet seed treatments and early sowing. Seed Science and Technology, 18: 839–850.
Dziezyc J., Nowak L., Panek K. (1987): The decade indicators of the rainfall needs of the crops cultivated in Poland. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych, 314: 11–33. (In Polish)
FAO (2014): World Reference Base for Soil Resources. Rome, World Soil Resources Reports No. 106.
Halmer P. (2003): Methods to improve seed performance in the field. In: Benech-Arnold R.L., Sánchez R.A. (eds.): Handbook of Seed Physiology: Application to Agriculture. Philadelphia, Haworth Press, 125–166.
Heyes V., Osborne B., Halmer P., Hughes M. (1997): Advanced sugar beet seed goes international. British Sugar Beet Review, 67: 39–41.
Hoffmann Christa M., Huijbregts Toon, van Swaaij Noud, Jansen Rudolf (2009): Impact of different environments in Europe on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes. European Journal of Agronomy, 30, 17-26
Jarvis P.J., Patchett M.R. (1998): The effect of seed advancement treatment on the yield quality and bolting susceptibility of sugar beet crop. Aspects of Applied Biology, 52: 39–44.
Kenter Christine, Hoffmann Christa M., Märländer Bernward (2006): Effects of weather variables on sugar beet yield development (Beta vulgaris L.). European Journal of Agronomy, 24, 62-69
Kockelmann A., Meyer U. (2006): Seed production and quality. In: Draycott A.P. (ed.): Sugar Beet. Hoboken, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 89–113.
Mukasa Yuji, Takahashi Hiroyuki, Taguchi Kazunori, Ogata Naoki, Okazaki Kazuyuki, Tanaka Masakatsu (2015): Accumulation of Soluble Sugar in True Seeds by Priming of Sugar Beet Seeds and the Effects of Priming on Growth and Yield of Drilled Plants. Plant Production Science, 6, 74-82
Pačuta V., Rašovský M., Buday M. (2017a): Influence of weather conditions, variety and biopreparations Alga 300 P and K and Alga 600 on root yield, sugar content and polarized sugar yield of sugar beet. Listy cukrovarnické a řepařské, 133: 96–100.
Pačuta V., Rašovský M., Černý I. (2017b): Influence of weather conditions, variety and biopreparations Alga 300 P, K and Alga 600 on molasses components, white sugar content and white sugar yield of sugar beet. Listy cukrovarnické a řepařské, 133: 232–236.
Paparella S., Araújo S. S., Rossi G., Wijayasinghe M., Carbonera D., Balestrazzi Alma (2015): Seed priming: state of the art and new perspectives. Plant Cell Reports, 34, 1281-1293
RA�OVSK� Marek, PACUTA VLADIM�R (2016): Influence of selected agrotechnical measures and climate conditions on root yield and digestion of sugar beet. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 17, 1070-1081
Rush Charles M. (1991): Comparison of Seed Priming Techniques with Regard to Seedling Emergence and Pythium Damping-Off in Sugar Beet. Phytopathology, 81, 878-
Sadeghian S. Y., Yavari N. (2004): Effect of Water-Deficit Stress on Germination and Early Seedling Growth in Sugar Beet. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190, 138-144
Stibbe Carsten, Märländer Bernward (2002): Field emergence dynamics significance to intraspecific competition and growth efficiency in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). European Journal of Agronomy, 17, 161-171
Thomas T.H., Jaggard K.W., Durrant M.J., Mash S.J. (1994): The physiological advancement of sugar beet seed. In: Martin T. (ed.): Seed Treatment: Progress and Prospects. Brackwell, British Crop Protection Council, 391–396.
Wyszyński Z. (2006): Variability of the number and arrangement of plants in a sugar beet canopy under environmental and agrotechnical factors. Science Agriculture Bohemica, 37: 133–139.
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti