Chemical properties and microbial responses to biochar and compost amendments in the soil under continuous watermelon cropping
Yun Cao, Yan Ma, Dejie Guo, Qiujun Wang, Guangfei Wanghttps://doi.org/10.17221/141/2016-PSECitation:Cao Y., Ma Y., Guo D., Wang Q., Wang G. (2017): Chemical properties and microbial responses to biochar and compost amendments in the soil under continuous watermelon cropping . Plant Soil Environ., 63: 1-7.
Biochar added to soil can improve crop growth and productivity. However, the mechanisms of crop growth improvement by biochar application are not well understood, particularly in the presence of soil-borne pathogens caused by continuous monocropping. Thus, a two-year field experiment was carried out to study the chemical and microbiological response of Lixisols (pH 5.8) to the amendment of biochar and its effect on watermelon productivity and Fusarium wilt disease incidence. Biochar was added alone or together with compost before watermelon transplanting. Mixed application of biochar with compost significantly increased watermelon yield as compared to adding compost or biochar alone. However, biochar had no effects on Fusarium wilt disease incidence in both years. Combined application of biochar with compost significantly increased contents of soil NH4+-N, available phosphorus (P) and available potassium (K). Soil Biolog data indicated that the Shannon-Weaver diversity index and evenness index were increased significantly in the combined application of biochar with the compost treatment. There was a significant positive correlation between watermelon yield and soil NH4+-N, available P, available K, microbial diversity or microbial evenness in the continuous watermelon monocropping system.Keywords:
soil fertility; organic amendment; microbial community; fungal disease; crop productivity
gorji m., Gorji M., Asadi H., GH Bagheri-Marandi, AA Pourbabaee (): Effects of rice husk biochar application on the properties of alkaline soil and lentil growth. Plant, Soil and Environment, 61, 475-482 https://doi.org/10.17221/117/2015-PSEAdam Gillian, Duncan Harry (2001): Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33, 943-951 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00244-3Akhter Adnan, Hage-Ahmed Karin, Soja Gerhard, Steinkellner Siegrid (2016): Potential of Fusarium wilt-inducing chlamydospores, in vitro behaviour in root exudates and physiology of tomato in biochar and compost amended soil. Plant and Soil, 406, 425-440 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2948-4Atkinson Christopher J., Fitzgerald Jean D., Hipps Neil A. (2010): Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant and Soil, 337, 1-18 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0464-5Bailey Vanessa L., Fansler Sarah J., Smith Jeffrey L., Bolton Harvey (2011): Reconciling apparent variability in effects of biochar amendment on soil enzyme activities by assay optimization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, 296-301 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.10.014Bao S. (2000): Agricultural and Chemical Analysis of Soil. Beijing, China Agricultural Press. (In Chinese)Chintala Rajesh, Schumacher Thomas E., McDonald Louis M., Clay David E., Malo Douglas D., Papiernik Sharon K., Clay Sharon A., Julson James L. (2014): Phosphorus Sorption and Availability from Biochars and Soil/Biochar Mixtures. CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water, 42, 626-634 https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201300089Doan Thuy Thu, Bouvier Corinne, Bettarel Yvan, Bouvier Thierry, Henry-des-Tureaux Thierry, Janeau Jean Louis, Lamballe Patrice, Nguyen Bo Van, Jouquet Pascal (2014): Influence of buffalo manure, compost, vermicompost and biochar amendments on bacterial and viral communities in soil and adjacent aquatic systems. Applied Soil Ecology, 73, 78-86 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.08.016Elmer Wade H., Pignatello Joseph J. (2011): Effect of Biochar Amendments on Mycorrhizal Associations and Fusarium Crown and Root Rot of Asparagus in Replant Soils. Plant Disease, 95, 960-966 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-10-0741Gathorne-Hardy A., Knight J., Woods J. (2009): Biochar as a soil amendment positively interacts with nitrogen fertiliser to improve barley yields in the UK[C]//IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, 37: 372052.Ghosh S., Ow L. Fern, Wilson B. (): Influence of biochar and compost on soil properties and tree growth in a tropical urban environment. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, , - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0508-0Graber E.R., Frenkel O., Jaiswal A.K., Elad Y. (2014): How may biochar influence severity of diseases caused by soilborne pathogens? Carbon Management, 5: 169–183.Guan S. (1986): Soil Enzymes and their Research Methods. Beijing, China Agricultural Press. (In Chinese)Hale Lauren, Luth Madeline, Crowley David (2015): Biochar characteristics relate to its utility as an alternative soil inoculum carrier to peat and vermiculite. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 81, 228-235 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.023Jaiswal Amit K., Elad Yigal, Graber Ellen R., Frenkel Omer (2014): Rhizoctonia solani suppression and plant growth promotion in cucumber as affected by biochar pyrolysis temperature, feedstock and concentration. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 69, 110-118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.051Jaiswal A.K. (2013): Impact of biochar amendment to a potting medium on damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia solani. [M.Sc. thesis] Hebrew, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Jeffery S., Verheijen F.G.A., van der Velde M., Bastos A.C. (2011): A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 144, 175-187 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015Jindo Keiji, Suto Koki, Matsumoto Kazuhiro, García Carlos, Sonoki Tomonori, Sanchez-Monedero Miguel A. (2012): Chemical and biochemical characterisation of biochar-blended composts prepared from poultry manure. Bioresource Technology, 110, 396-404 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.120Kolb Simone E., Fermanich Kevin J., Dornbush Mathew E. (2009): Effect of Charcoal Quantity on Microbial Biomass and Activity in Temperate Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 73, 1173- https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0232Lammirato Carlo, Miltner Anja, Kaestner Matthias (2011): Effects of wood char and activated carbon on the hydrolysis of cellobiose by β-glucosidase from Aspergillus niger. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, 1936-1942 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.05.021Lehmann J., da Silva J.P.Jr., Steiner C., Nehls T., Zech W., Glaser B. (2003): Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: Fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant and Soil, 249: 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022833116184Lehmann Johannes, Rillig Matthias C., Thies Janice, Masiello Caroline A., Hockaday William C., Crowley David (2011): Biochar effects on soil biota – A review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, 1812-1836 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022Liu B., Li Y.X., Zhang X.L., Wang J., Gao M. (2015): Effects of chlortetracycline on soil microbial communities: Comparisons of enzyme activities to the functional diversity via Biolog EcoPlates™. European Journal of Soil Biology, 68: 69–76.Major Julie, Rondon Marco, Molina Diego, Riha Susan J., Lehmann Johannes (2010): Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna oxisol. Plant and Soil, 333, 117-128 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0327-0Nannipieri P., Kandeler E., Ruggiero P. (2002): Enzyme activities and microbiological and biochemical processes in soil. In: Burns R.G., Dick R.P. (eds): Enzymes in the Environment. Activity, Ecology and Applications. New York, Marcel Dekker.Partey Samuel T., Preziosi Richard F., Robson Geoffrey D. (2014): Short-Term Interactive Effects of Biochar, Green Manure, and Inorganic Fertilizer on Soil Properties and Agronomic Characteristics of Maize. Agricultural Research, 3, 128-136 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-014-0102-1Oleszczuk Patryk, Zielińska Anna, Cornelissen Gerard (2014): Stabilization of sewage sludge by different biochars towards reducing freely dissolved polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) content. Bioresource Technology, 156, 139-145 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.003Paz-Ferreiro Jorge, Fu Shenglei, Méndez Ana, Gascó Gabriel (2014): Interactive effects of biochar and the earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus on plant productivity and soil enzyme activities. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 14, 483-494 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0806-zQayyum M., Steffens D., Reisenauer H.P., Schubert S. (2014): Biochars influence differential distribution and chemical composition of soil organic matter. Plant, Soil and Environment, 60: 337–343.Van Zwieten L., Kimber S., Morris S., Chan K. Y., Downie A., Rust J., Joseph S., Cowie A. (2010): Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant and Soil, 327, 235-246 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0050-xWang Xiubin, Song Dali, Liang Guoqing, Zhang Qian, Ai Chao, Zhou Wei (2015): Maize biochar addition rate influences soil enzyme activity and microbial community composition in a fluvo-aquic soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 96, 265-272 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.08.018Watzinger A., Feichtmair S., Kitzler B., Zehetner F., Kloss S., Wimmer B., Zechmeister-Boltenstern S., Soja G. (2014): Soil microbial communities responded to biochar application in temperate soils and slowly metabolized 13 C-labelled biochar as revealed by 13 C PLFA analyses: results from a short-term incubation and pot experiment. European Journal of Soil Science, 65, 40-51 https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12100Zwart D.C., Kim S.-H. (2012): Biochar amendment increases resistance to stem lesions caused by Phytophthora spp. in tree seedlings. HortScience, 47: 1736–1740.