Planting density impact on weed infestation and the yield of Miscanthus grown on two soil types  

https://doi.org/10.17221/234/2016-PSECitation:Maksimović J., Pivić R., Stanojković-Sebić A., Vučić-Kišgeci M., Kresović B., Dinić Z., Glamočlija Đ. (2016): Planting density impact on weed infestation and the yield of Miscanthus grown on two soil types  . Plant Soil Environ., 62: 384-388.
download PDF
The assessment of the weed infestation effect on biomass yield of Miscanthus × giganteus in the first year of its commercial yield was conducted on two types of soil with different productive ability – Luvic Chernozem and Calcic Gleysol. The formed mass of weeds was higher on Luvic Chernozem and the infestation had grown according to the stages of Miscanthus growth. The biomass of weeds depended on the planting density of Miscanthus as well as on the weather conditions during the studied years. Weed infestation of crops very significantly influenced the formation of aboveground biomass of Miscanthus, so that the yields in the first year of commercial harvesting in the control where the weeds were removed manually were significantly higher compared to the crops in which weeds were not removed. The obtained results showed that weeds significantly affect the initial growth and development of Miscanthus plants that are, in general, slow, especially in the year of the crop establishment. The study evaluates the impact of a manual method of suppression and weed infestation of crops on the commercial yield of Miscanthus.  
References:
Anderson Eric K., Voigt Thomas B., Bollero Germán A., Hager Aaron G. (2010): Miscanthus × giganteus Response to Preemergence and Postemergence Herbicides. Weed Technology, 24, 453-460  https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-10-00044.1
 
Anderson Eric, Arundale Rebecca, Maughan Matthew, Oladeinde Adebosola, Wycislo Andrew, Voigt Thomas (2014): Growth and agronomy of Miscanthus x giganteus for biomass production. Biofuels, 2, 71-87  https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.80
 
Angelini Luciana G., Ceccarini Lucia, Nassi o Di Nasso Nicoletta, Bonari Enrico (2009): Comparison of Arundo donax L. and Miscanthus x giganteus in a long-term field experiment in Central Italy: Analysis of productive characteristics and energy balance. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 635-643  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.10.005
 
Borkowska H., Molas R. (2010): Weeds density of perennial energy crop species as dependent on plantation maturity. Acta Agrophysica, 15: 13–21. (In Polish)
 
Buhler Douglas D., Netzer Daniel A., Riemenschneider Don E., Hartzler Robert G. (1998): Weed management in short rotation poplar and herbaceous perennial crops grown for biofuel production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 14, 385-394  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10075-7
 
Christian D.G. (1994): Quantifying the yield of perennial grasses grown as a biofuel for energy generation. Renewable Energy, 5, 762-766  https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1481(94)90083-3
 
Christian D.G., Riche A.B., Yates N.E. (2008): Growth, yield and mineral content of Miscanthus×giganteus grown as a biofuel for 14 successive harvests. Industrial Crops and Products, 28, 320-327  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.02.009
 
Dželetović Ž., Dražić G., Blagojević S., Mihailović N. (2006): Specific agrotechnical conditions of Miscanthus cultivation. Agricultural Engineering, 31: 107–115.
 
Glamočlija Đ., Janković S.M., Pivić R. (2012): Alternative Grains: Economic Importance, Growing Conditions, Species and Agricultural Practices. Beograd, Mladost biro DD. Zemun. (In Serbian)
 
Haines S. A., Gehl R. J., Havlin J. L., Ranney T. G. (2015): Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer Effects on Establishment of Giant Miscanthus. BioEnergy Research, 8, 17-27  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9499-4
 
Lesur-Dumoulin Claire, Lorin Mathieu, Bazot Mathieu, Jeuffroy Marie-Hélène, Loyce Chantal (2016): Analysis of young Miscanthus  ×  giganteus yield variability: a survey of farmers’ fields in east central France. GCB Bioenergy, 8, 122-135  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12247
 
Lewandowski I., Clifton-Brown J.C., Scurlock J.M.O., Huisman W. (2000): Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop. Biomass and Bioenergy, 19, 209-227  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00032-5
 
Milovanović J., Babović N., Đorđević A., Spasić S., Marišová E., Končeková L., Kotrla M., Tóthová M. (2011): External and Internal Factors Influencing the Growth and Biomass Production of Short Rotation Woods Genus Salix and Perennial Grass Miscanthus. Belgrade, Singidunum University Belgrade.
 
Price L., Bullard M., Lyons H., Anthony S., Nixon P. (2004): Identifying the yield potential of Miscanthus × giganteus: An assessment of the spatial and temporal variability of
 
M. × giganteus biomass productivity across England and Wales. Biomass and Bioenergy, 26: 3–13.
 
SEMERE T, SLATER F (2007): Ground flora, small mammal and bird species diversity in miscanthus (Miscanthus×giganteus) and reed canary-grass (Phalaris arundinacea) fields. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31, 20-29  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.07.001
 
Smeets Edward M.W., Lewandowski Iris M., Faaij André P.C. (2009): The economical and environmental performance of miscanthus and switchgrass production and supply chains in a European setting. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 1230-1245  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.006
 
Stępień W., Górska E.B., Pietkiewicz S., Kalaji M.H. (2014): Long-term mineral fertilization impact on chemical and microbiological properties of soil and Miscanthus × giganteus yield. Plant, Soil and Environment, 60: 117–122.
 
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti