Physical disturbance accelerates carbon loss through increasing labile carbon release

Zhang X.W., Yu F.H. (2020): Physical disturbance accelerates carbon loss through increasing labile carbon release. Plant Soil Environ., 66: 584–589.


download PDF

Labile carbon (C) is a major source of C loss because of its high vulnerability to environmental change. Yet its potential role in regulating soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics remains unclear. In this study, we tested the effect of physical disturbance on SOC decomposition using soils from two abandoned farmlands free of management practice for more than 28 years. The soil respiration rate was measured in undisturbed and disturbed soil columns and was inversely modeled using the two-compartment model. We found that the C loss was 16.8~74.1% higher in disturbed than in undisturbed soil columns. Physical disturbance increased the total amount of labile C (C1) loss by 136~241%, while had no effect on the kinetic decomposition rate constants of both labile (k1) and stable (k2) SOC decomposition. Physical disturbance fragmented the large macroaggregates into small macroaggregates, microaggregates, and free silt and clay-sized fractions. This indicates that C loss was derived from the initially protected labile C, and there was no change of SOC fraction being decomposed. Our results give insights into the understanding of the extent of labile C loss to physical disruption and demonstrate the potential effect of physical disturbance on SOC dynamics.


An S.S., Darboux F., Cheng M. (2013): Revegetation as an efficient means of increasing soil aggregate stability on the Loess Plateau (China). Geoderma, 209–210: 75–85.
Christensen B.T. (2001): Physical fractionation of soil and structural and functional complexity in organic matter turnover. European Journal of Soil Science, 52: 345–353.
Davidson E.A., Janssens I.A. (2006): Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 440: 165–173.
Drury C.F., Yang X.M., Reynolds W.D., Tan C.S. (2004): Influence of crop rotation and aggregate size on carbon dioxide production and denitrification. Soil and Tillage Research, 79: 87–100.
Godde C.M., Thorburn P.J., Biggs J.S., Meier E.A. (2016): Understanding the impacts of soil, climate, and farming practices on soil organic carbon sequestration: a simulation study in Australia. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7: doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00661.
Gregorich E.G., Kachanoski R.G., Voroney R.P. (1989): Carbon mineralization in soil size fractions after various amounts of aggregate disruption. European Journal of Soil Science, 40: 649–659.
Hassink J. (1992): Effects of soil texture and structure on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in grassland soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 14: 126–134.
Kleber M., Eusterhues K., Keiluweit M., Mikutta C., Mikutta R., Nico P.S. (2015): Chapter one – mineral-organic associations: formation, properties, and relevance in soil environments. Advances in Agronomy, 130: 1–140.
Krull E.S., Baldock J.A., Skjemstad J.O. (2003): Importance of mechanisms and processes of the stabilisation of soil organic matter for modelling carbon turnover. Functional Plant Biology, 30: 207–222.
Lehmann J., Kleber M. (2015): The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature, 528: 60–68.
Lin J.J., Zhu B., Cheng W.X. (2015): Decadally cycling soil carbon is more sensitive to warming than faster-cycling soil carbon. Global Change Biology, 21: 4602–4612.
Luo Z.K., Baldock J., Wang E.L. (2017): Modelling the dynamic physical protection of soil organic carbon: insights into carbon predictions and explanation of the priming effect. Global Change Biology, 23: 5273–5283.
Rey A., Jarvis P. (2006): Modelling the effect of temperature on carbon mineralization rates across a network of European forest sites (FORCAST). Global Change Biology, 12: 1894–1908.
Six J., Paustian K. (2014): Aggregate-associated soil organic matter as an ecosystem property and a measurement tool. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 68: A4–A9.
Sollins P., Homann P., Caldwell B.A. (1996): Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter: mechanisms and controls. Geoderma, 74: 65–105.
Somasundaram J., Chaudhary R.S., Awanish Kumar D., Biswas A.K., Sinha N.K., Mohanty M., Hati K.M., Jha P., Sankar M., Patra A.K., Dalal R., Chaudhari S.K. (2018): Effect of contrasting tillage and cropping systems on soil aggregation, carbon pools and aggregate-associated carbon in rainfed Vertisols. European Journal of Soil Science, 69: 879–891.
Tian J., Pausch J., Yu G.R., Blagodatskaya E., Gao Y., Kuzyakov Y. (2015): Aggregate size and their disruption affect 14C-labeled glucose mineralization and priming effect. Applied Soil Ecology, 90: 1–10.
Zakharova A., Beare M.H., Cieraad E., Curtin D., Turnbull M.H., Millard P. (2015): Factors controlling labile soil organic matter vulnerability to loss following disturbance as assessed by measurement of soil-respired δ13CO2. European Journal of Soil Science, 66: 135–144.
Zakharova A., Midwood A.J., Hunt J.E., Graham S.L., Artz R.R.E., Turnbull M.H., Whitehead D., Millard P. (2014): Loss of labile carbon following soil disturbance determined by measurement of respired δ13CO2. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 68: 125–132.
Zhang X.W., Han X.Z., Yu W.T., Wang P., Cheng W.X. (2017): Priming effects on labile and stable soil organic carbon decomposition: pulse dynamics over two years. PLoS One, 12: e0184978.
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti