Effect of sowing density on grain yield, protein and oil content and plant morphology of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill)

https://doi.org/10.17221/346/2019-PSECitation:Sobko O., Hartung J., Zikeli S., Claupein W., Gruber S. (2019): Effect of sowing density on grain yield, protein and oil content and plant morphology of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). Plant Soil Environ., 65: 594-601.
download PDF

To find out exactly how sowing density and sowing pattern affect soybean grain yield, quality and its components in non-traditional soybean growing regions, such as Germany, two field trials have been conducted at two locations in Bavaria in 2016 and 2017. The experiments were carried out with four sowing densities (30, 50, 70, 90 seeds/m2) and four cultivars from different maturity groups (Viola 000, Lissabon 000, ES Mentor 00, Orion 00) as randomized complete block design with four replicates. Almost all evaluated traits varied significantly depending on year × location. There was no interaction between the main factors (cultivar × sowing density). The results revealed that grain yield and height of the first pod increased with increase of sowing density. The number of pods per plant and branching decreased with increasing sowing density. At higher sowing densities at flowering leaf area index was significantly higher than at lower sowing densities. The cv. ES Mentor (00) with 70 seeds/m2 has proved to be a suitable cultivar in terms of yield and quality in southern Germany (> 3.6 t/ha grain yield and 40% protein).

Agrometeorology Bayern (2018): Weather data in Bavaria. Available at: https://www.wetter-by.de/Internet/AM/inetcntrBY.nsf/cuhome.xsp?src=L941ES4AB8&p1=K1M7X321X6&p3=10VER48553&p4=4D078O1691 (last updated 01 January 2018, verified 1 February 2018).
BAES (2018): Austrian descriptive list of varieties 2018. Available at: https://www.baes.gv.at/pflanzensorten/oesterreichische-beschreibende-sortenliste (last updated 01 May 2018, verified 1 Jun 2018).
Boquet D.J. (1990): Plant population density and row spacing effects on soybean at post-optimal planting dates. Agronomy Journal, 82: 59–64. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200010013x
Boroomandan P., Khoramivafa M., Haghi Y., Ebrahimi A. (2009): The effects of nitrogen starter fertilizer and plant density on yield, yield components and oil and protein content of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 12: 378–382. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2009.378.382
Egli D.B. (1993): Cultivar maturity and potential yield of soybean. Field Crops Research, 32: 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90027-K
Epler M., Staggenborg S. (2008): Soybean yield and yield component response to plant density in narrow row systems. Crop Management, 7. https://doi.org/10.1094/CM-2008-0925-01-RS
FAO (2018): Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. Available at: http://gaez.fao.org/Main.html (verified 1 Jun 2018).
Fehr W.R., Caviness C.E., Burmood D.T., Pennington J.S. (1971): Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Science, 11: 929–933. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100060051x
Ferreira A.S., Balbinot J.A.A., Werner F., Zucareli C., Franchini J.C.r., Debiasi H. (2016): Plant density and mineral nitrogen fertilization influencing yield, yield components and concentration of oil and protein in soybean grains. Bragantia, 75: 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.479
Hahn V., Miedaner T. (2013): Soybean Cultivation in the EU (German): Rewarding Cultivation without GMOs (100% practice). Frankfurt am Main, DLG-Verlag, 120.
Herbert S.J., Litchfield G.V. (1984): Growth response of short-season soybean to variations in row spacing and density. Field Crops Research, 9: 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(84)90022-4
De Luca M.J., Nogueira M.A., Hungria M. (2014): Feasibility of lowering soybean planting density without compromising nitrogen fixation and yield. Agronomy Journal, 106: 2118–2124. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj14.0234
LI-COR (1992): LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer: Instruction Manual. Lincoln.
Littell R.C. (2004): SAS System for Mixed Models. 6th Edition. Cary, SAS Institute, 633.
Mehmet O.Z. (2008): Nitrogen rate and plant population effects on yield and yield components in soybean. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7: 4464–4470.
Pazdernik D.L., Killam A.S., Orf J.H. (1997): Analysis of amino and fatty acid composition in soybean seed, using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Agronomy Journal, 89: 679–685. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900040022x
Piepho H.P., Buchse A., Emrich K. (2003): A Hitchhiker's guide to mixed models for randomized experiments. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 189: 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037X.2003.00049.x
Popovic V., Vidić M., Jocković Đ., Ikanović J., Jaksic S., Cvijanovic G. (2012): Variability and correlations between yield components of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Genetics, 44: 33–45.
Rahman M.M., Hossain M., Bell R.W. (2011a): Plant density effects on growth, yield and yield components of two soybean varieties under equidistant planting arrangement. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 10: 278–286. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2011.278.286
Rahman M.M., Hossain M.M., Anwar M.P., Juraimi A.S. (2011b): Plant density influence on yield and nutritional quality of soybean seed. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 10: 125–132. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2011.125.132
Ribeiro A.B.M., Bruzi A.T., Zuffo A.M., Zambiazzi E.V., Soares I.O., Vilela N.J.D., Pereira J.L. de A.R., Moreira S.G. (2017): Productive performance of soybean cultivars grown in different plant densities. Ciência Rural, 47: 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20160928
Sojafoedering (2018): 25% Growth: Record Acreage for Soybean in Germany. Available at: https://www.sojafoerderring.de/ (last updated 20 Sep 2018, verified 1 Dec 2018).
Sojafoedering (2019): Growing Counsellor for Soybean in Germany. Available at: https://www.sojafoerderring.de/ (last updated 20 Sep 2017; verified 10 Jan 2019).
Souza R., Teixeira I., Reis E., Silva A. (2016): Soybean morphophysiology and yield response to seeding systems and plant populations. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 76: 3–8. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392016000100001
Spader V., Deschamps C. (2015): Grain yield of soybean cultivars using different densities and sowing dates in a high-altitude region of south Brazil. Ciências Agrárias, 36: 1823–1834. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n3Supl1p1823
Spaeth S.C., Randall H.C., Sinclair T.R., Vendeland J.S. (1984): Stability of soybean harvest index. Agronomy Journal, 76: 482–486. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600030028x
Weber C.R., Shibles R.M., Byth D.E. (1966): Effect of plant population and row spacing on soybean development and production. Agronomy Journal, 58: 99–102. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1966.00021962005800010034x
Wells R. (1991): Soybean growth response to plant density: Relationships among canopy photosynthesis, leaf area, and light interception. Crop Science, 31: 755–761. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100030044x
Yilmaz N. (2003): The effects of seed rate on yield and yield components of soybean (Glycine max L. Merill). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 6: 373–376. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2003.373.376
Yunusa I.A.M., Ikawelle M.C. (1990): Yield response of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) to planting density and row spacing in a semi-arid tropical environment. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 164: 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1990.tb00818.x
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti