Soil solution pH can affect the response of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to mesotrione residues

Pismarović L., Milanović-Litre A., Kljak K., Lazarević B., Šćepanović M. (2022): Soil solution pH can affect the response of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to mesotrione residues. Plant Soil Environ., 68: 237–244.

download PDF

Soil pH can affect the adsorption of mesotrione and exacerbate crop injury under non-acidic conditions. Soil samples collected from the same location were irrigated with water solutions of pH 7.5, 6.5, 5.5, and 4.5 and treated with 72, 36, 24, 18, 9, 4.5, 2.3, and 1.1 g a.i. (active ingredient) of mesotrione/ha. Bean growth was monitored over 28 days. Soil pH solution did not influence the effect of mesotrione on plant fresh weight, while herbicide-induced visual injury and reduction in carotenoid content were significantly mitigated under acidic conditions. The lowest rate (1.1 g a.i./ha) applied in slightly acidic soil (pH 6.5) caused visual injury of 45% 28 days after treatment, while visual injuries on plants grown in soils with pH 4.5 were only 20%. Further, bean plants grown at pH 4.5 showed only 3.3% lower carotenoid content compared to control plants since for those grown in a slightly alkaline environment (pH 7.5) reduction of this pigment was 35.5%. The mean effective dose (ED50 ± standard error) of mesotrione for inhibition of carotenoids were 5.25 ± 0.61 g a.i./ha at pH 7.5, 9.57 ± 0.74 g a.i./ha at pH 6.5, 13.07 ± 0.91 g a.i./ha at pH 5.5, and 14.98 ± 0.94 g a.i./ha at pH 4.5. Results indicate that the common bean is highly susceptible to the presence of mesotrione residue and that this sensitivity strongly depends on soil pH solution.

Barchanska H., Kluza A., Krajczewska K., Maj J. (2015): Degradation study of mesotrione and other triketone herbicides on soils and sediments. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 16: 125–133.
Boesten J.J.T.I. (1993): Bioavailability of organic chemicals in soil related to their concentration in the liquid phase: a review. Science of The Total Environment, 134: 397–407.
Carles L., Joly M., Joly P. (2017): Mesotrione herbicide: efficiency, effects, and fate in the environment after 15 years of agricultural use. CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water, 45: 1700011.
Chaabane H., Vulliet E., Calvayrac C., Coste C.-M., Cooper J.-F. (2008): Behaviour of sulcotrione and mesotrione in two soils. Pest Management Science, 64: 86–93.
Chen L., Song F.R., Liu Z.Q., Zheng Z., Xing J.P., Liu S.Y. (2012): Multi-residue method for fast determination of pesticide residues in plants used in traditional chinese medicine by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1225: 132–140.
Dyson J.S., Beulke S., Brown C.D., Lane M.C.G. (2002): Adsorption and degradation of the weak acid mesotrione in soil and environmental fate implications. Journal of Environmental Quality, 31: 613–618.
Đurović R. (2011): The processes that determine the fate of pesticides in soil. Pesticidi i Fitomedicina, 26: 9–22.
EPPO (2014): European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. PP 1/135 (4) Phytotoxicity Assessment. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 44: 265–273.
Felix J., Doohan D.J., Bruins D. (2007): Differential vegetable crop responses to mesotrione soil residues a year after application. Crop Protection, 26: 1395–1403.
Goršić M., Barić K., Galzina N., Šćepanović M., Ostojić Z. (2008): Weed control in maize with new herbicide topramezone. Cereal Research Communications, 36: 1627–1630.
Heap (2022): I. The International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database. Available at: (accessed on January 14, 2022)
Holm G. (1954): Chlorophyll mutations in barley. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 4: 457–471.
Jovanović-Radovanov K. (2011): Susceptibility of cultivated plants to residual action of imazethapyr and clomazone. [PhD thesis] Beograd, University of Belgrade. (In Serbian)
Lehman R.G., Miller J.R., Fontaine D.D., Laskowski D.A., Hunter J.H., Cordes R.C. (1992): Degradation of a sulfonamide herbicide as a function of soil sorption. Weed Research, 32: 197–205.
Mitchell G., Bartlett D.W., Fraser T.E.M., Hawkes T.R., Holt D.C., Townson J.K., Wichert R.A. (2001): Mesotrione: a new selective herbicide for use in maize. Pest Management Science, 57: 120–128.<120::AID-PS254>3.0.CO;2-E
Pang N., Wang T.L., Hu J., Dong B.Z. (2016): Field evaluation and determination of four herbicides in a wheat ecosystem by a simple and versatile QuEChERS method with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 99: 376–389.
Pintar A. (2020a): A bioassay method for detection mesotrione residues in soils with different physico-chemical properties. Dissertation. Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture. Available at:
Pintar A., Stipičević S., Lakić J., Barić K. (2020b): Phytotoxicity of mesotrione residues on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in agricultural soils differing in adsorption affinity. Sugar Tech, 22: 137–142.
Pintar A., Stipicevic S., Svecnjak Z., Baric K., Lakic J., Sraka M. (2020c): Crop sensitivity to mesotrione residues in two soils: field and laboratory bioassay. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 80: 496–504.
Pintar A., Svečnjak Z., Lakić J., Magdić I., Brzoja D., Barić K. (2021): The susceptibility of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to simulated mesotrione residues as affected by soil pH manipulation. Agriculture (Switzerland), 11: 688.
Püntener W. (1981): Manual for Field Trials in Crop Protection. Ciba-Geigy, Agricultural Division.
Riddle R.N., O’Sullivan J., Swanton C.J., Van Acker R.C. (2013): Field and greenhouse bioassays to determine mesotrione residues in soil. Weed Technology, 27: 565–572.
Ritz C., Baty F., Streibig J.C., Gerhard D. (2015): Dose-response analysis using R. Plos One, 10: e0146021.
Robinson D.E. (2008): Atrazine accentuates carryover injury from mesotrione in vegetable crops. Weed Technology, 22: 641–645.
Romdhane S., Devers-Lamrani M., Beguet J., Bertrand C., Calvayrac C., Salvia M.-V., Jrad A.B., Dayan F.E., Spor A., Barthelmebs L., Martin-Laurent F. (2019): Assessment of the ecotoxicological impact of natural and synthetic β-triketone herbicides on the diversity and activity of the soil bacterial community using omic approaches. Science of The Total Environment, 651: 241–249.
Santelmann P.W. (1977): Herbicide bioassays. In: Truelove B. (ed.): Research Methods in Weed Science. Auburn, Southern Weed Science Society, 80–87.
Shaner D., Brunk G., Nissen S., Westra P., Chen W.L. (2012): Role of soil sorption and microbial degradation on dissipation of mesotrione in plant-available soil water. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41: 170–178.
Soltani N.Ã., Sikkema P.H., Robinson D.E. (2007): Response of four market classes of dry bean to mesotrione soil residues. Crop Protection, 26: 1655–1659.
Su W., Hao H., Wu R., Xu H., Xue F., Lu C. (2017): Degradation of mesotrione affected by environmental conditions. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 98: 212–217.
Von Wettstein D. (1957): Chlorophyll-letale und der submikroskopische Formwechsek der Plastiden. Experimental Cell Research, 12: 427–506.
Wichert R.A., Towson J.K., Bartlett D.W., Foxon G.A. (1999): Technical review of mesotrione, a new maize herbicide. The 1999 Brighton Conference – Weeds. British Crop Protection Council, 105–110.
Young B.G., Johnson B.C., Matthews J.L. (1999): Preemergence and sequential weed control with mesotrione in conventional corn. North Central Weed Science Society, Research Report, 56: 226–227.
Young B.G., Young J.M., Matthews J.L. (2003): Soybean (Glycine max) response to foliar applications of mesotrione. Weed Technology, 17: 651–654.
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti