Influence of sowing density on agronomic traits of lupins (Lupinus spp.)
A. Pospišil, M. Pospišilhttps://doi.org/10.17221/436/2015-PSECitation:Pospišil A., Pospišil M. (2015): Influence of sowing density on agronomic traits of lupins (Lupinus spp.). Plant Soil Environ., 61: 422-425.
The aim of the research conducted on eutric brown soil on the experimental facility of Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb in 2012 and 2013, was to determine the optimal sowing density for two cultivars of white lupin (Teodora and Energy) and a cultivar of narrow-leafed lupin (Arabella). The study included three sowing densities: 60, 75 and 90 germinated seeds/m2. The cultivars of white lupin achieved significantly higher seed yield, higher 1000 seed weight, higher weight of seeds per plant and higher protein content in the seed, compared to the cultivar of narrow-leafed lupin. The sowing density had no effect on seed yield, but the increase in sowing density above 60 germinated seeds/m2 significantly reduced the number of pods, the number of seeds and seed weight per plant.Keywords:
Lupinus angustifolius; L. albus; legume; growing conditions; forage; yield componentsReferences:
AOAC (2002): Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17th Ed. Gaithersburg, Association of Analytical Communities.Böhm H., Bramm A., Aulrich K., Rühl G. (2008): Yield and predicted feed quality of different German cultivars of blue lupins (Lupinus angustifolius). In: Palta J.A., Berger J.B. (eds): Proceedings of the 12th International Lupin Conference, 14–18 September, Fremantle.Doxastakis G. (2007): Lupin seed protein. Developments in Food Science, 41: 7–38.Erbaş M., Certel M., Uslu M.K. (2005): Some chemical properties of white lupin seeds (Lupinus albus L.). Food Chemistry, 89, 341-345 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.02.040Faluyi M.A, Zhou X.M, Zhang F, Leibovitch S, Migner P, Smith D.L (2000): Seed quality of sweet white lupin (Lupinus albus) and management practice in eastern Canada. European Journal of Agronomy, 13, 27-37 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00057-5Fraser M.D., Fychan R., Jones R. (2005): Comparative yield and chemical composition of two varieties of narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) when harvested as whole-crop, moist grain and dry grain. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 120, 43-50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.12.014Herbert S. J. (1977): Growth and grain yield of Lupinus albus at different plant populations. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, 459-465 https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1977.10427360Jensen Christian R, Joernsgaard Bjarne, Andersen Mathias N, Christiansen Jørgen L, Mogensen Vagn O, Friis Poul, Petersen Carsten T (2004): The effect of lupins as compared with peas and oats on the yield of the subsequent winter barley crop. European Journal of Agronomy, 20, 405-418 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(03)00057-1Lo´pez-Bellido Luis, Fuentes Mariano, Castillo Juan E. (2000): Growth and Yield of White Lupin Under Mediterranean Conditions. Agronomy Journal, 92, 200- https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.922200xMülayim Mevlüt, Tamkoç Ahmet, Babaoglu Mehmet (2002): Sweet white lupins versus local bitter genotype: agronomic characteristics as affected by different planting densities in the Göller region of Turkey. European Journal of Agronomy, 17, 181-189 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00007-2Unkovich MJ, Pate JS, Hamblin J (1994): The nitrogen economy of broadacre lupin in southwest Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 45, 149- https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9940149