Do foliar applications of nickel increase urease activity and nutrient levels in pecan leaflets?

https://doi.org/10.17221/487/2021-PSECitation:

Acevedo-Barrera A.A., Cruz-Alvarez O., Hernández-Rodríguez O.A., Benavides-Mendoza A., Orozco-Meléndez L.R., Soto-Caballero M.C., Escudero-Almanza D.J., Ojeda-Barrios D.L. (2022): Do foliar applications of nickel increase urease activity and nutrient levels in pecan leaflets? Plant Soil Environ., 68: 129–136.

 

download PDF

Nickel (Ni) deficiency limits the production of pecan. Concentrations of mineral nutrients and urease activity in leaflets of young pecan plants cv. Pawnee were evaluated in response to foliar applications of Ni as Ni sulfate or Ni citrate, or as chelates with EDDHA, EDTA, or DTPA. Significant variations were found in N-total concentration with Ni-EDDHA (27.17 ± 0.98 g/kg) and Ni-sulphate (28 ± 0.89 g/kg), where the latter together with Ni-citrate were high in phosphorus concentrations. Levels of Ni2+ (3.70 mg/kg), Mn2+ (222.73 mg/kg) and Zn2+ (38.69 mg/kg) were all increased in leaflets sprayed with Ni-EDDHA but the Mn2+ concentrations were similar for leaflets sprayed with Ni-sulphate. The Ni-DTPA spray significantly reduced foliar Fe2+ concentration (73.66 ± 3.44 mg/kg). No significant effects of the sprays were observed on the concentrations of total chlorophyll or carotenoids. The plants sprayed with Ni-EDDHA showed significant increases in leaflet area and leaflet dry weight and also in root dry weight. The urease showed maximum activity in leaflets sprayed with Ni-EDDHA, Ni-citrate and Ni-sulphate. This study suggests growers of the pecan should consider foliar sprays of Ni-EDDHA or Ni-sulphate to increase the levels of Ni in their trees if Ni is a growth-limiting factor.

 

References:
Aburto-González C.A., Castillo-González A.M., Alejo-Santiago G., López-Buena B.A., Juarez-Lopez P., López-Guzmán G.G., Enciso-Arámbula R. (2021): Nutrition of persian lemon (Citrus latifolia Tanaka) by the rational method. Interciencia, 46: 37–42.
 
Almanza P.J., Rojas H.A., Borda G.D.C., Galindo A.R., Galindo D.R. (2009): Foliar nickel application to Cucurbita ficifolia Bouché for crystalline urease (EC 3.5. 1.5) production. Agronomía Colombiana, 27: 33–40.
 
Bai C., Reilly C.C., Wood B.W. (2006): Nickel deficiency disrupts metabolism of ureides, amino acids, and organic acids of young pecan foliage. Plant Physiology, 140: 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.072983
 
Bai C., Reilly C.C., Wood B.W. (2007): Nickel deficiency affects nitrogenous forms and urease activity in spring xylem sap of pecan. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 132: 302–309. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.132.3.302
 
Balandrán-Valladares M.I., Cruz-Álvarez O., Jacobo-Cuellar J.L., Hernández-Rodríguez O.A., Flores-Cordova M.A., Parra-Quezada R.A., Sánchez-Chávez E., Ojeda-Barrios D.L. (2021): Changes in nutrient concentration and oxidative metabolism in pecan leaflets at different doses of zinc. Plant, Soil and Environment, 67: 33–39. https://doi.org/10.17221/525/2020-PSE
 
De Oliveira J.B., Lavres J., van der Ent A. (2021): In situ analysis of nickel uptake from foliar application in pecan using instrumental µXRF analysis. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 21: 1–9.
 
De Queiroz-Barcelos J.P., de Souza-Osorio C.R.W., Leal A.J.F., Alves C.Z., Santos E.F., Reis H.P.G., dos Reis A.R. (2017): Effects of foliar nickel (Ni) application on mineral nutrition status, urease activity and physiological quality of soybean seeds. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 11: 184–192. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.17.11.02.p240
 
Freitas D.S., Rodak B.W., Carneiro M.A.C., Guilherme L.R.G. (2019): How does Ni fertilization affect a responsive soybean genotype? A dose study. Plant and Soil, 441: 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04146-2
 
García E. (2004): Modifications to the Köppen Climate Classification System. 5th Edition. Mexico, National Commission for the study of Biodiversity (CONABIO), 52–63. ISBN 970–32–1010–4 (In Spanish)
 
Ghasemi S., Khoshgoftarmanesh A.H., Afyuni M., Hadadzadeh H. (2013): The effectiveness of foliar applications of synthesized zinc-amino acid chelates in comparison with zinc sulfate to increase yield and grain nutritional quality of wheat. European Journal of Agronomy, 45: 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2012.10.012
 
Hernández-Lopez M., Rodríguez-Ortiz J.C., Hernández-Montiel L.G., Figueroa-Viramontes U., Zapata-Sifuentes G., Preciado-Rangel P. (2020): Correction of "mouse ear" symptoms in pecan with foliar applications of nickel. Terra Latinoamericana, 38: 833–840.
 
Lucasynski-Carlim E., Meert L., Reis B., Ercoli-Alleman L. (2019): Fertilization with nickel and molybdenum in soybean: effect on agronomic characteristics and grain quality. Terra Latinoamericana, 37: 217–222. https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v37i3.379
 
Ma J., Zhang M., Liu Z., Chen H., Li Y.C., Sun Y., Ma Q., Zhao C. (2019): Effects of foliar application of the mixture of copper and chelated iron on the yield, quality, photosynthesis, and microelement concentration of table grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 254: 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.04.075
 
Moran-Duran S.A., Flynn R.P., Heerema R., Van Leeuwen D. (2020): Leaf net photosynthesis, leaf greenness, and shoot lignin content of nonbearing pecan trees at two nitrogen and nickel application rates. HortScience, 55: 231–236. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14314-19
 
Neves O.S.C., Ferreira E.V.D.O., Carvalho J.G.D., Soares C.R.F.S. (2007): Addition of nickel to nutrient solution for cultivating spondias tuberose tree seedlings. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 31: 485–490. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832007000300008
 
Niu J., Liu C., Huang M., Liu K., Yan D. (2021): Effects of foliar fertilization: a review of current status and future perspectives. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 21: 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00346-3
 
Ojeda-Barrios D.L., Hernández-Rodríguez O.A., Martínez-Téllez J., Núñez-Barrios A., Perea-Portillo E. (2009): Foliar application of zinc chelates on pecan. Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura, 15: 205–210. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2009.15.028
 
Ojeda-Barrios D.L., Sánchez-Chávez E., Sida-Arreola J.P., Valdez-Cepeda R., Balandran-Valladares M. (2016): The impact of foliar nickel fertilization on urease activity in pecan trees. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 16: 237–247. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162016005000019
 
Polacco J.C., Mazzafera P., Tezotto T. (2013): Opinion-nickel and urease in plants: still many knowledge gaps. Plant Science, 199: 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.10.010
 
Pond A.P., Walworth J.L., Kilby M.W., Gibson R.D., Call R.E., Núnez H. (2006): Leaf nutrient levels for pecans. HortScience, 41: 1339–1341.  https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.41.5.1339
 
Rahman H., Sabreen S., Alam S., Kawai S. (2005): Effects of nickel on growth and composition of metal micronutrients in barley plants grown in nutrient solution. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 28: 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1081/PLN-200049149
 
Rodríguez-Jiménez T.D.J., Ojeda-Barrios D.L., Blanco-Macías F., Valdez-Cepeda R.D., Parra-Quezada R. (2016): Urease and nickel in plant physiology. Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura, 22: 69–82. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2014.11.051
 
Smith M.W., Rohla C.T., Goff W.D. (2012): Pecan leaf elemental sufficiency ranges and fertilizer recommendations. HortTechnology, 22: 594–599. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.22.5.594
 
Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. (1995): Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 3rd Edition. New York, W.H. Freeman and Company, 190–196. ISBN: 0716724111
 
Wagle P., Smith M.W., Wood B.W., Rohla C.T. (2011): Response of young bearing pecan trees to spring foliar nickel applications. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 34: 1558–1566. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2011.585210
 
Wellburn A.R. (1994): The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. Journal of Plant Physiology, 144: 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2
 
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti