Evaluation of maize hybrids types harvested at the similar stage of maturity
R. Loučka, J. Nedělník, J. Lang, V. Jambor, J. Třináctý, Y. Tyrolováhttps://doi.org/10.17221/559/2015-PSECitation:Loučka R., Nedělník J., Lang J., Jambor V., Třináctý J., Tyrolová Y. (2015): Evaluation of maize hybrids types harvested at the similar stage of maturity. Plant Soil Environ., 61: 560-565.
The objective of the experiments was to compare types of maize hybrids harvested at the similar stage of maturity, between one and two thirds of the milk line stage of grain. The study involved 9 hybrids with different parameters that were grown during a period of three subsequent years in two locations with different level of precipitation. Differences in terms of the content of dry matter between the hybrids at different timing of harvests were small (323 ± 22 g/kg), showing no statistical significance (P = 0.34). Comparing the early maturity hybrids with the medium early hybrids (P < 0.05), the former showed a lower content of starch (299 g/kg dry matter (DM)), and the latter showed a slightly higher value (312 g/kg DM) – while the measured proportion of neutral detergent fibre (NDF) among these two hybrids was 453 vs. 428 g/kg DM. Comparing the measured value of the normally ripening hybrids against the stay-green hybrids, the starch was 314 vs. 294 g/kg DM, and NDF was 434 vs. 451 g/kg DM, respectively. As for the comparison between the flint (vitreous) type of grain endosperm vs. dent (floury), measured value of the starch was 298 vs. 323 g/kg DM, and NDF was 451 vs. 427 g/kg DM, respectively.Keywords:
type of plant; earliness; Zea mays; precipitation; silage; FAO indexReferences:
AOAC (1995): Official Methods of Analysis. 16th Ed. Vol. 1. Washington, Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Bal M.A., Coors J.G., Shaver R.D. (1997): Impact of the Maturity of Corn for Use as Silage in the Diets of Dairy Cows on Intake, Digestion, and Milk Production. Journal of Dairy Science, 80, 2497-2503 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76202-7Carpentier B., Cabon G. (2011): Forage maize: Elaboration of yield and quality, harvest, and conservation. Fourrages, 205: 11–23.Cone J.W., Van Gelder A.H., Van Schooten H.A., Groten J.A.M. (2008): Effects of forage maize type and maturity stage on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 55, 139-154 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-5214(08)80033-4Di Marco O.N, Aello M.S, Nomdedeu M, Van Houtte S (2002): Effect of maize crop maturity on silage chemical composition and digestibility (in vivo, in situ and in vitro). Animal Feed Science and Technology, 99, 37-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(02)00077-9Ettle Thomas, Schwarz Frieder J�rg (2003): Effect of maize variety harvested at different maturity stages on feeding value and performance of dairy cows. Animal Research, 52, 337-349 https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2003023Farrell A. D., Gilliland T. J. (2011): Yield and quality of forage maize grown under marginal climatic conditions in Northern Ireland. Grass and Forage Science, 66, 214-223 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2010.00778.xHetta M., Mussadiq Z., Gustavsson A.-M., Swensson C. (2012): Effects of hybrid and maturity on performance and nutritive characteristics of forage maize at high latitudes, estimated using the gas production technique. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 171, 20-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.09.015Kruse Sandra, Herrmann Antje, Kornher Alois, Taube Friedhelm (2008): Evaluation of genotype and environmental variation in fibre content of silage maize using a model-assisted approach. European Journal of Agronomy, 28, 210-223 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.07.007Lopes J.C., Shaver R.D., Hoffman P.C., Akins M.S., Bertics S.J., Gencoglu H., Coors J.G. (2009): Type of corn endosperm influences nutrient digestibility in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 4541-4548 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2090Ørskov E. R., McDonald I. (1979): The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 92, 499- https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048Peyrat J., Nozière P., Le Morvan A., Férard A., Protin P.V., Baumont R. (2014): Effects of ensiling maize and sample conditioning on in situ rumen degradation of dry matter, starch and fibre. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 196, 12-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.06.017Pilipavičius V., Mikulioniene S. (2010): Effects of maize maturity stage and concentration of dry matter on maize silage fodder value. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 8: 691–694.Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A. (1991): Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583-3597 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2