Fertilizer type influences tomato yield and soil N2O emissions
Luca Vitale, Franca Polimeno, Lucia Ottaiano, Giuseppe Maglione, Anna Tedeschi, Mauro Mori, Anna De Marco, Paul Di Tommasi, Vincenzo Magliulohttps://doi.org/10.17221/678/2016-PSECitation:Vitale L., Polimeno F., Ottaiano L., Maglione G., Tedeschi A., Mori M., De Marco A., Di Tommasi P., Magliulo V. (2017): Fertilizer type influences tomato yield and soil N2O emissions . Plant Soil Environ., 63: 105-110.
Improvements in crop management for a more sustainable agriculture are fundamental to reduce environmental impacts of cropland and to mitigate effects on global climate change. In this study three fertilization types – ammonium nitrate (control); mineral fertilizer added with a nitrification inhibitor (3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP)), and an organo-mineral fertilizer (OM) – were tested on a tomato crop in order to evaluate effects both on crop production and soil N2O emissions. Plants grown under OM fertilization had a greater relative growth rate compared to mineral fertilization, due to a higher net assimilation rate, which was related to a greater light interception rather than to a higher photosynthetic efficiency. OM fertilization determined the highest fruit production and lower soil N2O fluxes compared to NH4NO3, although the lowest soil N2O fluxes were found in response to mineral fertilizer added with a nitrification inhibitor. It can be concluded that organo-mineral fertilizer is a better nutrient source compared to mineral fertilizers able to improve crop yield and to mitigate soil N2O emission.Keywords:
plant growth; nitrous oxide; emission factor; Mediterranean climate
Ball B.C., Ball B.C., McTaggart I.P., Scott A. (2004): Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soil under silage production by use of organic manures or slow-release fertilizer. Soil Use and Management, 20, 287-295 https://doi.org/10.1079/SUM2004257BARTH G., VON TUCHER S., SCHMIDHALTER U. (2008): Effectiveness of 3,4-Dimethylpyrazole Phosphate as Nitriflcation Inhibitor in Soil as Influenced by Inhibitor Concentration, Application Form, and Soil Matric Potential. Pedosphere, 18, 378-385 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(08)60028-4Bell M.J., Hinton N., Cloy J.M., Topp C.F.E., Rees R.M., Cardenas L., Scott T., Webster C., Ashton R.W., Whitmore A.P., Williams J.R., Balshaw H., Paine F., Goulding K.W.T., Chadwick D.R. (2015): Nitrous oxide emissions from fertilised UK arable soils: Fluxes, emission factors and mitigation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 212, 134-147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.003Kaiser Ernst-August, Ruser Reiner (2000): Nitrous oxide emissions from arable soils in Germany — An evaluation of six long-term field experiments. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 163, 249-259 https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2624(200006)163:3<249::AID-JPLN249>3.0.CO;2-ZHuang T., Gao B., Hu X.-X., Lu X., Well R., Christie P., Bakken L.R., Ju X.-Y. (2014): Ammonia-oxidation as an engine to generate nitrous oxide in an intensively managed calcareous Fluvo-aquic soil. Scientific Report, 4: 39–50.Yao Z., Wei Y., Liu C., Zheng X., Xie B. (2015): Organically fertilized tea plantation stimulates N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and lowers NO fluxes in subtropical China. Biogeosciences, 12, 5915-5928 https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5915-2015IPCC (2007): Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, New York, Cambridge University Press.Poorter Hendrik, Remkes Carlo (1990): Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Oecologia, 83, 553-559 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317209Radford P. J. (1967): Growth Analysis Formulae - Their Use and Abuse1. Crop Science, 7, 171- https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1967.0011183X000700030001xRanucci Silvia, Bertolini Teresa, Vitale Luca, Tommasi Paul, Ottaiano Lucia, Oliva Marco, Amato Umberto, Fierro Angelo, Magliulo Vincenzo (2011): The influence of management and environmental variables on soil N2O emissions in a crop system in Southern Italy. Plant and Soil, 343, 83-96 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0674-xRees Robert M., Baddeley John A., Bhogal Anne, Ball Bruce C., Chadwick David R., Macleod Michael, Lilly Allan, Pappa Valentini A., Thorman Rachel E., Watson Christine A., Williams John R. (2013): Nitrous oxide mitigation in UK agriculture. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 59, 3-15 https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2012.733869Snyder CS, Davidson EA, Smith P, Venterea RT (2014): Agriculture: sustainable crop and animal production to help mitigate nitrous oxide emissions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 9-10, 46-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.005Stolk P. C., Jacobs C. M. J., Moors E. J., Hensen A., Velthof G. L., Kabat P. (2009): Significant non-linearity in nitrous oxide chamber data and its effect on calculated annual emissions. Biogeosciences Discussions, 6, 115-141 https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-6-115-2009Vitale L., Ottaiano L., Polimeno F., Maglione G., Amato U., Arena C., Di Tommasi P., Mori M., Magliulo V. (2013): Effects of 3,4-dimethylphyrazole phosphate-added nitrogen fertilizers on crop growth and N2O emissions in Southern Italy. Plant, Soil and Environment, 59: 517–523.Zerulla Wolfram, Barth Thomas, Dressel Jürgen, Erhardt Klaus, Horchler von Locquenghien Klaus, Pasda Gregor, Rädle Matthias, Wissemeier Alexander (2001): 3,4-Dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) - a new nitrification inhibitor for agriculture and horticulture. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 34, 79-84 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740100380