Comparison of the effect of various long-term fertilization systems on the content and fractional composition of humic compounds in Lessive soil
Wiera Sądej, Andrzej Cezary Żołnowski
https://doi.org/10.17221/777/2018-PSECitation:Sądej W., Żołnowski A.C. (2019): Comparison of the effect of various long-term fertilization systems on the content and fractional composition of humic compounds in Lessive soil. Plant Soil Environ., 65: 172-180.A field experiment was established in 1972 on Luvisol. Three types of fertilizers – cattle manure (CM), cattle slurry (CS) and mineral fertilizers were used. CS was applied in the following doses: I – balanced with CM in terms of the amount of introduced total nitrogen and II – balanced with CM in terms of the amount of introduced total organic carbon (Ctot). 39 years after the experiment was established, half of each experimental plot was limed and since then the experiment was carried in two series – non-limed and limed soils. The paper presents the results of soil analyses 41 years after the experiment was started. It was found that each fertilization system increased the Ctot content in soil in relation to the unfertilized control plot. The increase of Ctot fluctuated between 0.35–6.22 g/kg of dry matter. In both series, the highest Ctot content was observed in the soil fertilized with CM and CM + PK. Limed compared to non-limed soil contained nearly 25% more carbon of humic acids than fulvic acids and nearly 20% lower content of low molecular humic bonds. Liming considerably widened the humic acids carbon:fulvic acids carbon (CHA:CFA) ratio of the fertilized soils, up to 1.32–1.87, while the corresponding objects of the non-limed series showed the CHA:CFA ratio between 0.75–0.97.
organic fertilizers; mineralization; absorbance; decomposition; macronutrient; soil organic matter
References:Impact factor (Web of Science):
2021: 2.328
Q2 – Agronomy
5-Year Impact Factor: 2.197
SCImago Journal Rank (SCOPUS):
New Issue Alert
Join the journal on Facebook!
Ask for email notification.
Similarity Check
All the submitted manuscripts are checked by the CrossRef Similarity Check.
Abstracts are comprised in the databases
AGRICOLA
Agrindex of AGRIS/FAO databáze
AGRIS International
CAB Abstracts
CNKI
CrossRef
Current Contents®/Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
Czech Agricultural and Food Bibliography
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
EBSCO – Academic Search Ultimate
Food Science and Technology Abstracts
Google Scholar
ISI Web of KnowledgeSM
J-GATE
Science Citation Index Expanded®
SCOPUS
TOXLINE Plus
Web of Science® (Core Collection)
Licence terms
All content is made freely available for non-commercial purposes, users are allowed to copy and redistribute the material, transform, and build upon the material as long as they cite the source.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Contact
Mgr. Kateřina Součková
Executive Editor
e-mail: pse
Address
Plant, Soil and Environment
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Slezská 7, 120 00 Praha 2,
Czech Republic