Sugar beet response to different K, Na and Mg ratios in applied fertilizers

https://doi.org/10.17221/809/2017-PSECitation:Barłóg P., Szczepaniak W., Grzebisz W., Pogłodziński R. (2018): Sugar beet response to different K, Na and Mg ratios in applied fertilizers. Plant Soil Environ., 64: 173-179.
download PDF

Potassium (K) in sugar beet can be partly replaced by magnesium (Mg) and sodium (Na). This hypothesis was verified based on 12 field experiments conducted on four farms in Poland during the seasons 2010–2012. The effect of different K, Na and Mg ratios in fertilizers applied in the total rate of 3205 mol/ha on beet yield (BY), storage root quality and white sugar yield (WSY) was determined. The tested K:Mg:Na cation ratios were as follows: 1:0:0; 1:0.11:0.09; 1:0.16:0.54 and 1:0.33:2.19. BY and WSY were affected by the total rate of the applied cations. The optimum ratio of K:Mg:Na was different with respect to the site and the growing season. The K rate reduction from 125 to 24 kg/ha combined with the simultaneous increase in the rate of Mg and Na did not result in lower BY. However, a too narrow K:Na ratio in applied fertilizers resulted in a decrease of sucrose content in storage roots. The fertilization cost for sugar beet production could be reduced through the application of fertilizers that contain fixed amounts of Na on soils rich in available K.

 

References:
Barłóg Przemysław, Grzebisz Witold, Błaszyk Roman (2016): Compositional nutrient diagnosis in sugar beet with sodium supplementation. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 63, 856-869  https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2016.1240364
 
Barłóg P., Grzebisz W. (2001): Effect of magnesium foliar appli-
 
cation on the yield and quality of sugar beet roots. Rostlinná Výroba, 47: 418–422.
 
Buchholz K., Märländer B., Puke H., Glattkowski H., Thielecke K. (1995): Neubewertung des technischen Wertes von Zuckerrüben. Zuckerindustrie, 120: 113–121.
 
Christenson D.R., Draycott A.P. (2006): Nutrition – Phosphorus, sulphur, potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium and micronutrients – Liming and nutrient deficiencies. In: Draycott A.P. (ed.): Sugar Beet. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 185–220.
 
Giroux M., Tran T.S. (1989): Effect of Potassium Fertilization and N-K Interaction on Sugarbeet Quality and Yield. Journal of Sugarbeet Research, 26, 11-23  https://doi.org/10.5274/jsbr.26.2.11
 
Grzebisz Witold (2013): Crop response to magnesium fertilization as affected by nitrogen supply. Plant and Soil, 368, 23-39  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1574-z
 
Haneklaus Silvia, Knudsen Leif, Schnug Ewald (2008): Relationship between potassium and sodium in sugar beet. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 29, 1793-1798  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629809370070
 
Kenter Christine, Hoffmann Christa M., Märländer Bernward (2006): Effects of weather variables on sugar beet yield development (Beta vulgaris L.). European Journal of Agronomy, 24, 62-69  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2005.05.001
 
Kronzucker Herbert J., Coskun Devrim, Schulze Lasse M., Wong Jessie R., Britto Dev T. (2013): Sodium as nutrient and toxicant. Plant and Soil, 369, 1-23  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1801-2
 
Oosterhuis Derrick M., Loka Dimitra A., Raper Tyson B. (2013): Potassium and stress alleviation: Physiological functions and management of cotton. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 176, 331-343  https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201200414
 
Römer Wilhelm, Claassen Norbert, Steingrobe Bernd, Märländer Bernward (2004): Reaktion der Zuckerrübe ( Beta vulgaris var. altissima ) auf die Kaliumdüngung - ein 20-jähriger Feldversuch. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 167, 726-735  https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200420437
 
Scherer H.W., Goldbach H.E., Clemens J. (2011): Potassium dynamics in the soil and yield formation in a long-term field experiment. Plant, Soil and Environment, 49, 531-535  https://doi.org/10.17221/4189-PSE
 
StatSoft, Inc. (2013): Electronic Statistics Textbook. Tulsa. Available at http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/
 
Subbarao G.V., Wheeler R.M., Stutte G.W., Levine L.H. (1999): How far can sodium substitute for potassium in red beet? Journal of Plant Nutrition, 22: 1745–1761.
 
Subbarao G.V., Ito O., Berry W.L., Wheeler R.M. (2003): Sodium – A functional plant nutrient. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 22: 391–416.
 
Tsialtas J. T., Maslaris N. (2009): Selective Absorption of K over Na in Sugar Beet Cultivars and its Relationship with Yield and Quality in Two Contrasting Environments of Central Greece. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195, 384-392  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00379.x
 
Wakeel Abdul, Farooq Muhammad, Qadir Manzoor, Schubert Sven (2011): Potassium Substitution by Sodium in Plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30, 401-413  https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.587728
 
Zhang Jin-Lin, Flowers Timothy J., Wang Suo-Min (2010): Mechanisms of sodium uptake by roots of higher plants. Plant and Soil, 326, 45-60  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0076-0
 
Zlámalová T., Elbl J., Baroň M., Bělíková H., Lampíř L., Hlušek J., Lošák T. (2016): Using foliar applications of magnesium and potassium to improve yields and some qualitative parameters of vine grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant, Soil and Environment, 61, 451-457  https://doi.org/10.17221/437/2015-PSE
 
download PDF

© 2019 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences