The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteusś-Caruk M., Podlaski S. (2019): The comparison of single and double cut harvests on biomass yield, quality and biogas production of Miscanthus × giganteus. Plant Soil Environ., 65: 369-376.
download PDF

The aim of the research was to determine the impact of double-cut harvest system on yield, as well as on suitability of Miscanthus × giganteus biomass for ensiling and biogas production. Biomass was harvested at the end of June (harvest I) and at the beginning of October (harvest II, regrowth). A single-cut regime at the end of October was also conducted. Biomass from harvests I and II was ensiled and subjected to anaerobic fermentation. The total dry matter (DM) yield from double-cut harvest system was similar to the DM yield from one-cut harvest, but two harvests per year had a positive effect on chemical composition of the biomass. C/N ratio and lignin content in the biomass from harvest I was lower compared to the single-cut biomass. Double harvest biomass was susceptible to ensiling, however, the biomass from harvest I characterized by low dry matter and water soluble sugars content resulted in poorer quality of the obtained silage (butyric acid was present). There were no significant differences between the methane yields obtained from ensiled biomass from harvests I and II.

Agbor Valery B., Cicek Nazim, Sparling Richard, Berlin Alex, Levin David B. (2011): Biomass pretreatment: Fundamentals toward application. Biotechnology Advances, 29, 675-685
Ambye-Jensen M., Johansen K.S., Didion T., Kádár Z., Schmidt J.E., Meyer A.S. (2013): Ensiling as biological pretreatment of grass
Ambye-Jensen Morten, Johansen Katja S., Didion Thomas, Kádár Zsofiá, Schmidt Jens E., Meyer Anne S. (2013): Ensiling as biological pretreatment of grass (Festulolium Hykor): The effect of composition, dry matter, and inocula on cellulose convertibility. Biomass and Bioenergy, 58, 303-312
Baldini Mario, da Borso Francesco, Ferfuia Claudio, Zuliani Fabio, Danuso Francesco (2017): Ensilage suitability and bio-methane yield of Arundo donax and Miscanthus×giganteus. Industrial Crops and Products, 95, 264-275
Borreani G., Tabacco E., Schmidt R.J., Holmes B.J., Muck R.E. (2018): Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. Journal of Dairy Science, 101, 3952-3979
Danner H., Holzer M., Mayrhuber E., Braun R. (2003): Acetic Acid Increases Stability of Silage under Aerobic Conditions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 562-567
Demirbaş Ayhan (2003): Relationships between lignin contents and fixed carbon contents of biomass samples. Energy Conversion and Management, 44, 1481-1486
FAO (2014): World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps. Rome, World Soil Resources Report, 106. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Frydendal-Nielsen Susanne, Hjorth Maibritt, Baby Sanmohan, Felby Claus, Jørgensen Uffe, Gislum René (2016): The effect of harvest time, dry matter content and mechanical pretreatments on anaerobic digestion and enzymatic hydrolysis of miscanthus. Bioresource Technology, 218, 1008-1015
Golkowska Katarzyna, Greger Manfred (2013): Anaerobic digestion of maize and cellulose under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions – A comparative study. Biomass and Bioenergy, 56, 545-554
Jones M., Walsh M. (2015): Miscanthus for Energy and Fibre. London, James and James Ltd.
Kaiser J., Bruckerhoff S., Douglas J., Baldwin B. (2011): In-field Weathering Influences Harvestable Biomass Yield and Biofuel Quality of Warm-Season Grasses in the Lincoln Hills of Elsberry, Missouri. Aspects of Applied Biology 112. Biomass and Energy Crops IV. Champaign, University of Illinois, 331–332.
Kiesel A., Lewandowski I. (2016): Miscanthus as Biogas Substrate –
Cutting Tolerance and Potential for Anaerobic Digestion. Chicago, GCB Bioenergy, 1–15.
Kumar Raj, Singh Sompal, Singh Om V. (2008): Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 35, 377-391
McDonald P., Hednerson A., Heron S. (1991): The Biochemistry of Silage. 2nd Edition. Marlow, Chalcombe Publications.
McKendry Peter (2002): Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresource Technology, 83, 37-46
Mulat D., Horn S. (2018): Biogas production from lignin via anaerobic digestion. In: Beckhma G.T. (ed.): Lignin Valorization: Emerging Approaches. London, Royal Society of Chemistry, 391–412.
Lewandowski I., Clifton-Brown J.C., Scurlock J.M.O., Huisman W. (2000): Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop. Biomass and Bioenergy, 19, 209-227
Lewandowski Iris, Clifton-Brown John, Trindade Luisa M., van der Linden Gerard C., Schwarz Kai-Uwe, Müller-Sämann Karl, Anisimov Alexander, Chen C.-L., Dolstra Oene, Donnison Iain S., Farrar Kerrie, Fonteyne Simon, Harding Graham, Hastings Astley, Huxley Laurie M., Iqbal Yasir, Khokhlov Nikolay, Kiesel Andreas, Lootens Peter, Meyer Heike, Mos Michal, Muylle Hilde, Nunn Chris, Özgüven Mensure, Roldán-Ruiz Isabel, Schüle Heinrich, Tarakanov Ivan, van der Weijde Tim, Wagner Moritz, Xi Qingguo, Kalinina Olena (2016): Progress on Optimizing Miscanthus Biomass Production for the European Bioeconomy: Results of the EU FP7 Project OPTIMISC. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, -
Liu Z., Saha B., Slininger P. (2008): Lignocellulosic biomass conversion to ethanol by Saccharomyces spp. In: Wall J., Harwood C., Demain A. (eds.): Bioenergy. Washington, American Society for Microbiology Press.
Peng Feng, Peng Pai, Xu Feng, Sun Run-Cang (2012): Fractional purification and bioconversion of hemicelluloses. Biotechnology Advances, 30, 879-903
Piątek Michał, Lisowski Aleksander, Kasprzycka Agnieszka, Lisowska Barbara (2016): The dynamics of an anaerobic digestion of crop substrates with an unfavourable carbon to nitrogen ratio. Bioresource Technology, 216, 607-612
Porter M. G., Murray R. S. (2001): The volatility of components of grass silage on oven drying and the inter-relationship between dry-matter content estimated by different analytical methods. Grass and Forage Science, 56, 405-411
Prochnow A., Heiermann M., Plöchl M., Linke B., Idler C., Amon T., Hobbs P.J. (2009): Bioenergy from permanent grassland – A review: 1. Biogas. Bioresource Technology, 100, 4931-4944
Sawatdeenarunat Chayanon, Surendra K.C., Takara Devin, Oechsner Hans, Khanal Samir Kumar (2015): Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and opportunities. Bioresource Technology, 178, 178-186
Stępień W., EB Górska, Pietkiewicz S., MH Kalaji (2014): Long-term mineral fertilization impact on chemical and microbiological properties of soil and Miscanthus × giganteus yield. Plant, Soil and Environment, 60, 117-122
Wang Zan, Jot Smyth T., Crozier Carl R., Gehl Ronald J., Heitman Adam J. (2018): Yield and Nitrogen Removal of Bioenergy Grasses as Influenced by Nitrogen Rate and Harvest Management in the Coastal Plain Region of North Carolina. BioEnergy Research, 11, 44-53
Whittaker Carly, Hunt John, Misselbrook Tom, Shield Ian (2016): How well does Miscanthus ensile for use in an anaerobic digestion plant?. Biomass and Bioenergy, 88, 24-34
Vasco-Correa Juliana, Li Yebo (2015): Solid-state anaerobic digestion of fungal pretreated Miscanthus sinensis harvested in two different seasons. Bioresource Technology, 185, 211-217
download PDF

© 2019 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences