Determination of the physical and mechanical properties of a potato (the Agria variety) in order to mechanise the harvesting and post-harvesting operations

https://doi.org/10.17221/122/2017-RAECitation:Ahangarnezhad N., Najafi G., Jahanbakhshi A. (2019): Determination of the physical and mechanical properties of a potato (the Agria variety) in order to mechanise the harvesting and post-harvesting operations. Res. Agr. Eng., 65: 33-39.
download PDF

Studying the physical and mechanical properties of agricultural products has been the subject of criticism and discussion for many years already and has attracted the attention of many researchers. The physical and mechanical properties of agriculture products are the most important parameters in the design of agricultural machinery sorting systems, transmissions, processing and packaging systems. The potato is one of the most important agricultural products as a food resource. The aim of this research is to investigate the physical properties and mechanical behaviour of the potato due to its importance and the current inadequate information about it. In this research, some of the physical and mechanical properties of the potato were measured in standard conditions. The length, width, thickness, geometric mean diameter and arithmetical diameter, sphericity, surface area, aspect ratio, mass, volume, bulk density and the  projected mean area were included in the physical properties. The mechanical properties of the potato were determined by using a universal testing machine (MRT-5; Santam, Germany) with a uniaxial compression test. Then, the mechanical properties were measured with four repetitions. The physical properties of the potato such as length, width, thickness, mass, volume and geometric mean diameter had a direct relationship, while the density had an inverse relation to the size. The result of the mechanical properties of the sample, such as vertical stress, elasticity module, deformation energy, fracture force and deformation were obtained respectively as 0.34 MPa, 3.09 MPa, 892.02 J, 8.80 N and 207.22 mm. The comparison of the potato’s real volume with the standard shapes showed that the potato’s shape is similar to an oval due to the largest determination coefficient (R2 = 0.86). The results of this research can be used for the design and optimisation of the processing equipment, as well as the transporting, sorting and packing of the potato crop.

References:
Bahnasawy A.H, El-Haddad Z.A, El-Ansary M.Y, Sorour H.M (2004): Physical and mechanical properties of some Egyptian onion cultivars. Journal of Food Engineering, 62, 255-261 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00238-3
 
Celik Ahmet, Ercisli >Sezai, Turgut Nihat (2009): Some physical, pomological and nutritional properties of kiwifruit cv. Hayward. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 58, 411-418 https://doi.org/10.1080/09637480701252518
 
Goyal R.K., Kingsly A.R.P., Kumar Pradeep, Walia Himanshu (2007): Physical and mechanical properties of aonla fruits. Journal of Food Engineering, 82, 595-599 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.03.019
 
Hassan-Beygi S.R., Ghaebi S.M., Arabhosseini A. (2009): Some physico-mechanical properties of apricot fruit, pit and kernel of ordubad variety. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal, XI: 1459.
 
İnce A., Uğurluay S., Güzel E., Özcan M.T. (2005): Bending and Shearing Characteristics of Sunflower Stalk Residue. Biosystems Engineering, 92, 175-181 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.07.003
 
Jahanbakhshi A. (2018): Determination of some engineering properties of snake melon (Cucumis melo var. flexuosus) fruit. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 20: 171–176.
 
Jahanbakhshi A., Abbaspour-Gilandeh Y., Mesri Gundoshmian T. (2018): Determination of physical and mechanical properties of carrot in order to reduce waste during harvesting and post-harvesting. Food Science & Nutrition, 6: 1898–1903.
 
Jahanbakhshi A., Yeganeh R., Akhoundzadeh Yamchi A. (2016): Determination of physical, mechanical and hydrodynamic properties of Scolymus. Electronic Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 8: 125–141. (in Persian)
 
Karaj Shkelqim, Müller Joachim (2010): Determination of physical, mechanical and chemical properties of seeds and kernels of Jatropha curcas L.. Industrial Crops and Products, 32, 129-138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.04.001
 
Kheiralipour K., Tabatabaeefar A., Mobli H., Rafiee S., Sharifi M., Jafari A., Rajabipour A. (2008): Some physical and hydrodynamic properties of two varieties of apple (Malus domestica Borkh L.). International Agrophysics, 22: 225–229.
 
Lorestani A.N., Tabatabaeefar A. (2006): Modelling the mass of kiwi fruit by geometrical attributes. International Agrophysics, 20: 135-139.
 
McGlone V.Andrew, Jordan Robert B, Seelye Richard, Martinsen Paul J (2002): Comparing density and NIR methods for measurement of Kiwifruit dry matter and soluble solids content. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 26, 191-198 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00014-5
 
Mohsenin N.N. (1986): Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Structure, Physical Characteristics and Mechanical Properties. 2nd Ed. New York, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
 
Omobuwajo T.O, Sanni L.A, Olajide J.O (2000): Physical properties of ackee apple (Blighia sapida) seeds. Journal of Food Engineering, 45, 43-48 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00040-6
 
Özcan Mehmet Musa, Hacıseferoğulları Haydar (2007): The Strawberry (Arbutus unedo L.) fruits: Chemical composition, physical properties and mineral contents. Journal of Food Engineering, 78, 1022-1028 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.12.014
 
OZTURK Erdogan, POLAT Taskin (2016): THE EFFECT OF LONG TERM STORAGE ON PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF POTATO. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, 21, 218- https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.69595
 
Peleg K. (1985): Produce Handling, Packaging and Distribution. Westport, AVI Publishing Company, Inc.
 
Marvin J. Pitts , Gary M. Hyde , Ralph P. Cavalieri (1987): Modeling Potato Tuber Mass with Tuber Dimensions. Transactions of the ASAE, 30, 1154-1159 https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.30536
 
Shahbazi F., Rahmati S. (2013): Mass modeling of fig (Ficus carica L.) fruit with some physical characteristics. Food Science & Nutrition, 1: 125–129.
 
Singh Krishna K., Reddy B. Sreenivasula (2006): Post-harvest physico-mechanical properties of orange peel and fruit. Journal of Food Engineering, 73, 112-120 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.01.010
 
Sitkei G. (1987): Mechanics of Agricultural Materials. Volume 8. 1st Ed. Elsevier Science.
 
Stroshine R.L. (2004): Physical Properties of Agricultural Materials and Food Products. West Lafayette, Purdue University.
 
Tabatabaeefar A. (2000): Physical properties of Iranian potato. In: Proceedings of the International Agricultural Engineering Conference, Bangkok, Dec 6–9, 2000: 4–7.
 
Taghizadeh M., Jajarmi A. (2015): Mass and volume modeling of lime and investigation of the correlation between different physical properties using principle component analysis. Iranian Food Science and Technology Research Journal, 11: 347–371.
 
Taheri-Garavand A., Rafiee S., Keyhani A. (2011): Study on some morphological and physical characteristics of tomato used in mass models to characterize best post harvesting options. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5: 433–438.
 
Ziaratban Armin, Azadbakht Mohsen, Ghasemnezhad Azim (2016): Modeling of volume and surface area of apple from their geometric characteristics and artificial neural network. International Journal of Food Properties, 20, 762-768 https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2016.1180533
 
download PDF

© 2019 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences