The physical and mechanical properties of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers as related to the automatic separation from clods and stones G., Abdollahpour S., Bakhtiari M.R. (2019): The physical and mechanical properties of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers as related to the automatic separation from clods and stones. Res. Agr. Eng., 65: 77-84.
download PDF

In the current research, some of the mechanical and physical properties of two industrial varieties of potato tubers that have a prominent role in the mechanised separation process from clods and stones were investigated. These properties include the physical dimension, mass, volume, sphericity, surface area, density, projected areas and Young’s modulus. In addition, the static coefficient of friction and rolling resistance for tubers on five surface materials were determined. The tuber’s size positively affected the physical and mechanical properties of the tubers. The frictional properties of the tubers were affected by the tuber size, the surface type, and the interaction between them. The results showed that most of the apparent properties for the Sante variety were greater than those of the Marfona variety. The static coefficient of friction for the tubers on a wood surface was the maximum and was the minimum value on a galvanized sheet, but for the tuber’s rolling resistance, the results were inversed. The results proposed that the automatic separation of the potato tubers from the impurities using the properties of the crop is possible.

Al-Maiman S.A., Ahmad D. (2002): Changes in physical and chemical properties during pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit maturation. Food Chemistry, 76: 437–441.
AOAC International (2016): Official Methods of Analysis. 20th Ed. Arlington, Association of Official Analytical Chemists International.
Bakhtiari M.R., Loghavi M. (2009): Development and evaluation of an innovative garlic clove precision planter. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 11: 125–136.
Bishop C., Gash A.F.J., Heslim C., Hanney S. (2012): The coefficient of friction of individual potatoes and various handling materials – Short Communication. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 58: 114–117.
Chakespari A.G., Rajabipour A., Mobli H. (2010): Post harvest physical and nutritional properties of two apple varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2: 61–68.
Dalvand M.J. (2011): Physical properties of potato tubers cv. analytic cultivated in Iran. Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin, 74: 117–128.
de Figueiredo A.K., Baümler E., Riccobene I.C., Nolasco S.M. (2011): Moisture-dependent engineering properties of sunflower seeds with different structural characteristics. Journal of Food Engineering, 102: 58–65.
FAOSTAT (2016): World potatoes production. Food and Agriculture Organization. Available at
Goyal R.K., Kingsly A.R.P., Kumar P., Walia H. (2007): Physical and mechanical properties of aonla fruits. Journal of Food Engineering, 82: 595–599.
Hosainpour A., Komarizade M.H., Mahmoudi A., Shayesteh M.G. (2011): High speed detection of potato and clod using an acoustic based intelligent system. Expert Systems with Applications, 38: 12101–12106.
Ichiki H., Van N.N., Yoshinaga K. (2013): Stone-clod separation and its application to potato cultivation in Hokkaido. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food, 6: 77–85.
Isik E., Izli N. (2007): Moisture dependent physical and mechanical properties of dent corn (Zea mays var. indentata Sturt.) seeds (Ada-523). American Journal of Food Technology, 2: 342–353.
Jahns G., Nielsen H.M., Paul W. (2001): Measuring image analysis attributes and modelling fuzzy consumer aspects for tomato quality grading. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 31: 17–29.
Jahromi M.K., Mohtasebi S.S., Jafari A., Mirasheh R., Rafiee S. (2008): Determination of some physical properties of date fruit (cv. Mazafati). Journal of Agricultural Technology, 4: 1–9.
Khoshnam F., Tabatabaeefar A., Varnamkhasti M.G., Borghei A. (2007): Mass modeling of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) fruit with some physical characteristics. Scientia Horticulturae, 114: 21–26.
Masoumi A.A., Rajabipoor A., Tabil L.G., Akram A.A. (2006): Physical attributes of garlic (Allium sativum L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 8: 15–23.
Mohsenin N.N. (1986): Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Structure, Physical Characteristics and Mechanical Properties. New York, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
Pliestic S., Dobricevic N., Filipovic D., Gospodaric Z. (2008): Influence of moisture content on physical and mechanical properties of almond (Prunus dulcis cv. Fra Giulio Grande). Transactions of the ASABE, 5: 653–659.
Razavi M.A., Emadzadeh B., Rafe A., Amini A.M. (2007): The physical properties of pistachio nut and its kernel as a function of moisture content and variety: Part I. Geometrical properties. Journal of Food Engineering, 81: 209–217.
Sahin S., Sumnu S.G. (2006): Physical Properties of Foods. New York, Springer-Verlag.
Schweers V.H., Voss R.E., Baghott K.G., Timm H., Bishop J.C., Wright D.N. (2007): Potato Harvesting. University of California, Vegetable Research and Information Center.
Tabatabaeefar A. (2002): Size and shape of potato tubers. International Agrophysics, 16: 301–305.
Van Zeebroeck M., Van Linden V., Darius P., De Ketelaere B., Ramon H., Tijskens E. (2007): The effect of fruit factors on the bruise susceptibility of apples. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 46: 10–19.
Wright M.E., Tappan J.H., Sistler F.E. (1986): The size and shape of typical sweet potatoes. Transactions of the ASAE, 29: 0678–0682.
Yurtlu Y. B., Yeşiloğlu E., Vursavuş K. K., Saçilik K. (2011): Coefficient of friction of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers in different surfaces. ADÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 8: 35–40.
Zare D., Safiyari H., Salmanizade F. (2012): Some physical and mechanical properties of jujube fruit. International Journal of Biological, Biomolecular, Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering, 6: 672–675.
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences