The physical properties and strength characteristics of kenaf plants O., Aluko O., Adetan D., Osunbitan J. (2019): The physical properties and strength characteristics of kenaf plants. Res. Agr. Eng., 65: 131-136.
download PDF

This article reports some physical properties and strength characteristics of two kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) varieties in Nigeria at critical stages of harvest with a view of understanding the plant material reaction to the load and deformation. The kenaf samples were subjected to a uniaxial compression test between two parallel plates at a loading rate of 20 mm·min–1 and a uniaxial bending test between two supports on each end at a loading rate of 50 mm·min–1 using a Universal Instron Testing Machine (Instron, USA). The results of the parameters studied revealed that Tianung 1 gave the higher stem height, stem diameter, compressive stress, bending stress, rupture load, rupture energy, Young’s modulus, and toughness, which were 293.10 cm, 18.45 mm, 8.70 MPa, 44.86 MPa, 191.51 N, 3.43 J·mm–2, 350.81 MPa, and 6.85 N·mm–1, respectively, at four months after planting. The parameters studied significantly increased with maturity for the two kenaf varieties. However, the moisture content significantly reduced with maturity.

Akil H.M., Omar M.F., Marzuki A.A.M., Safee S., Ishak Z.A.M., Bakar A.A. (2011): Kenaf fibre reinforced composites: A review. Materials and Design, 32: 4107–4121.
Anuar H., Zuraida A. (2011): Improvement in mechanical properties of reinforced thermoplastic elastomer composite with kenaf bast fibre. Composite Part B: Engineering, 42: 462 – 465.
ASABE (2012): Adjusting Forage Harvester Test Data for Varying Crop Moisture. ASABE Standards. St. Joseph, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
Dauda S.M., Ahmad D., Khalina A., Jamarei O. (2014): Physical and mechanical properties of kenaf stems at varying moisture contents. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 2: 370–374.
Ghahraei O., Ahmad D., Khalina A., Suryanto H., Othman, J. (2011): Cutting tests of kenaf stems. Transactions of the ASABE, 54: 51–56.
Karimi S., Tahir P.M., Dufresne A. (2014): Kenaf bast cellulosic fibres hierarchy: a comprehensive approach from micro to nano. Carbohydrate Polymers, 101: 878–885.
Kayembe P.K. (2015): Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) fibre yield and quality as affected by water, nitrogen, plant population and row spacing. [M.Sc. Thesis.] Pretoria, University of Pretoria: 231.
Lam T.B.T., Hori K., Iiyama K. (2003): Structural characteristics of cell walls of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) and fixation of carbon dioxide. Journal of Wood Science, 49: 255–261.
Joshi S.V., Drzal L.T., Mohanty A.K., Arora S. (2004): Are natural fibre composites environmentally superior to glass fibre reinforced composite? Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 35: 371–376.
Nazari G.M., Jafari A., Mohtasebi S.S., Tabatabaeefar A., Sharifi A., O’Dogherty, M.J., Rafiee S., Richard G. (2008): Effects of moisture content and level in the crop on the engineering properties of alfalfa stems. Biosystems Engineering, 101: 199–208.
Nishino T., Hirao K., Kotera M., Nakamae K., Inagaki H. (2003): Kenaf reinforced biodegradable composite. Composites Science and Technology, 63: 1281–1286.
Scordia D., Testa G., Cosentino S.L. (2013): Crop Physiology in Relation to Agronomic Management Practices. In: Monti A., Alexopoulou E. (eds), Kenaf: A Multi-Purpose Crop for Several Industrial Applications. London, Springer-Verlag London: 17–43.
Shakhes J., Zeinaly F., Marandi M., Saghafi T. (2011): The effects of processing variables on the soda and soda-AQ pulping of Kenaf bast fiber. BioResources, 6: 4626–4639.
Solomo, M.D., Ahmad D., Khalina A,. Othman J. (2013): Performance evaluation of a tractor mounted kenaf harvesting machine. Academic Research International, 4: 70–81.
Tavakoli H., Mahtasebi S.S., Jafari A. (2009): Physical and mechanical properties of wheat straw as influenced by moisture content. International Agrophysics, 23: 175–181.
Webber C.L. III, Bledsoe V.K., Bledsoe R.E. (2002): Kenaf harvesting and processing. In: Janick J., Whipkey A. (eds). Trends in new crops and new uses. Alexandria, ASHS Press: 327–339.
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences