This study was devoted to verifying the performance of various configurations of a winged chisel plough (WCP) in a soil bin. The performance of the new tool was assessed at three wing depths (5, 10 and 15 cm), three bend angles (10, 20 and 30 °), and three rake angles (7.5, 15 and 22.5 °) with three replications using a completely randomised design at a constant depth and speed of 30 cm and 1 m·s–1, respectively. The draught and vertical forces, soil disturbed and upheaved areas plus the efficiency of the soil loosening were measured during the tests. The results revealed that the draught and vertical forces were significantly increased by increasing the wing depth, bend and rake angles. The soil disturbance area increased with an increase in the wing depth, bend and rake angles. While the soil upheaving was decreased by increasing the wing depth and bend angle, the effect of the rake angle on the soil upheaving area was not significant. The maximum efficiency of the soil loosening of 268.1 cm2·kN–1 was achieved for a wing depth of 10 cm, a bend angle of 20 °, and a rake angle of 15 °. A significant improvement in the efficiency of the soil loosening along with maintaining a considerable portion of the residue on the soil surface suggest that the WCP should be adopted for conservation tillage.
Aboukarima A. (2007): Draft models of chisel plow based on simulation using artificial neural networks. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 24: 42–61.
Ahmed M.H., Godwin R.J. (1983): The influence of wing position on subsoiler penetration and soil disturbance. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 28: 489–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(83)90141-5
Akbarnia A., Mohammadi A., Alimardani R., Farhani F. (2014): Simulation of draft force of winged share tillage tool using artificial neural network model. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 16: 57–65.
Aluko O.B., Seig D.A. (2000): An experimental investigation of the charestristics of and conditions for brittle fracture in two-dimensional soil cutting. Soil and Tillage Research, 57: 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(00)00156-2
Al-Suhaibani S., Ghaly A.E. (2010): Effect of plowing depth of tillage and forward speed on the performance of a medium size chisel plow operating in a sandy soil. American Journal of Agriculture and Biological Science, 5: 247–255 https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2010.247.255
Arvidsson J., Hillerström O. (2010): Specific draught, soil fragmentation and straw incorporation for different tine and share types. Soil and Tillage Research, 110: 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.07.003
Arvidsson J., Keller T., Gustafsson K. (2004): Specific draught for mouldboard plough, chisel plough and disc harrow at different water contents. Soil and Tillage Research, 79: 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.07.010
Askari M., Shahgholi G., Abbaspour-Gilandeh Y., Tash-Shamsabadi H. (2016): The effect of new wings on subsoiler performance. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 32: 1–10.
Askari M., Shahgholi G., Abbaspour-Gilandeh Y. (2017): The effect of tine, wing, operating depth and speed on the draft requirement of subsoil tillage tines. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 63: 160–167. https://doi.org/10.17221/4/2016-RAE
Bulanon D., Kataoka T., Okamoto H., Hata, S. (2004): Development of a real-time machine vision system for the apple harvesting robot. In: SICE 2004 Annual Conference. Sapporo, Aug 4–6, 2004: 595–598.
Desbiolles J.M.A., Godwin R.J., Kilgour J., Blackmore B.S. (1997): A novel approach to the prediction of tillage tool draught using a standard tine. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 66: 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1997.0150
Durairaj C.D., Balasubramanian M. (1997): Influence of tool angles and speed on the soil reactions of a bent leg plough in two soils. Soil and Tillage Research, 44: 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(97)00048-2
Esehaghbeygi A., Tabatabaeefar A., Keyhani A.R., Raoufat M.H. (2005): Depth and rake angle's influence on the draft force of an oblique blade subsoiler. Iranian Agricultural Science, 36: 1045–1052 (in Farsi).
Godwin R.J. (2007): A review of the effect of implement geometry on soil failure and implement forces. Soil and Tillage Research, 97: 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.06.010
Godwin R.J., Spoor G., Leeds-Harrison P. (1981): An experimental investigation into the force mechanics and resulting soil disturbance of mole ploughs. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 26: 477–497 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(81)90081-0
Griffith D., Mannering J., Box J., Sprague M., Triplett G. (1986): Soil and moisture management with reduced tillage. In: Tillage Revolution. New York, John Wiley & Sons: 19–55.
Harrison H.P., Licsko Z.J. (1989): Soil reacting forces for models of three bent leg plows. Soil and Tillage Research, 15: 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(89)90069-X
Ibrahmi A., Bentaher H., Hamza E., Maalej A., Mouazen A. (2015): Study the effect of tool geometry and operational conditions on mouldboard plough forces and energy requirement: Part 2. Experimental validation with soil bin test. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, 117: 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.08.004
Jafari R., Karparvarfard S.H., Hosseini S.A. (2011): The effect of geometry and motion characteristics of narrow tillage tool on soil disturbance efficiency. Tarım Makinaları Bilimi Dergisi, 7: 12–19.
Jafari R., Tavakoli Hashtjin T., Raoufat M.H. (2008): Design, development and evaluation of optimal plan of ben tleg plow in order to enhance the energy consumption efficiency. 5th National Congress of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization. Mashhad city, Aug 27–29, 2008: 47–55 (in Farsi).
Liu J., Kushwaha R. (2006): Modeling of soil profile produced by a single sweep tool. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR Journal, 8: 1–13.
Majidi Iraj H., Raoufat M. (1997): Power requirement of a bent leg plow and its effects on soil physical conditions. Iranian Agricultural Research, 16: 1–16.
Manuwa S. (2009): Performance evaluation of tillage tines operating under different depths in a sandy clay loam soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 103: 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.12.004
McKyes E., Maswaure J. (1997): Effect of design parameters of flat tillage tools on loosening of a clay soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 43: 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(97)00014-7
Ramadhan M.N. (2014): Development and performance evaluation of the double tines subsoiler in silty clay soil part1: Draft force, disturbed area and specific resistance.Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture, 42: 293–313. https://doi.org/10.33899/magrj.2014.89363
Sahu R.K., Raheman H. (2006a): An approach for draft prediction of combination tillage implements in sandy clay loam soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 90: 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.08.015
Sahu R.K., Raheman H. (2006b): Draught prediction of agricultural implements using reference tillage tools in sandy clay loam soil. Biosystems Engineering, 94: 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.01.015
Salar M.R., Esehaghbeygi A., Hemmat A. (2013): Soil loosening characteristics of a dual bent blade subsurface tillage implement. Soil and Tillage Research, 134: 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.07.005
Subbulakshmi S., Harisudan C., Saravanan C., Subbian P. (2009): Conservation tillage-an ecofriendly management practices for agriculture. Research Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 56: 1098–1103.