Mass yield of biochar from hydrothermal carbonization of sucrose
J. Velebil, J. Malaťák, J. Bradnahttps://doi.org/10.17221/73/2015-RAECitation:Velebil J., Malaťák J., Bradna J. (2016): Mass yield of biochar from hydrothermal carbonization of sucrose. Res. Agr. Eng., 62: 179-184.
In this article, the effect of increasing dry matter content and reaction time of hydrothermal carbonization on mass yield of biochar was studied. Carbonization took place in batch experiments in a pressure vessel. Results have confirmed the assumption that the mass yield of biochar would increase with growing dry matter content in the initial solution and also with reaction time at reaction temperature of 200°C. It was found that components of the liquid product that remain in the biochar have a measurable impact on its mass yield. Mixing of the reactor proved to have a considerable effect on the mass yield as well. Biochar produced in absence of mixing had higher pore volume and higher yield. This was evident even after subtracting the equivalent liquid phase dry matter in the biochar after drying.Keywords:
HTC; wet torrefaction; reaction time; mixing; process liquid
Fiori L., Basso D., Castello D., Baratieri M. (2014): Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: Design of a batch reactor and preliminary experimental results. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 37: 55–60.Funke Axel, Ziegler Felix (2010): Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: A summary and discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 4, 160-177 https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.198Funke Axel, Ziegler Felix (2011): Heat of reaction measurements for hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. Bioresource Technology, 102, 7595-7598 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.016Lynam Joan G., Coronella Charles J., Yan Wei, Reza Mohammad T., Vasquez Victor R. (2011): Acetic acid and lithium chloride effects on hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology, 102, 6192-6199 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.035Lu Xiaowei, Pellechia Perry J., Flora Joseph R.V., Berge Nicole D. (2013): Influence of reaction time and temperature on product formation and characteristics associated with the hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Bioresource Technology, 138, 180-190 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.163Malaťák J., Bradna J. (2014): Use of waste material mixtures for energy purposes in small combustion devices. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 60: 50–59.Malaťák Jan, Dlabaja T. (): Hydrothermal carbonization of stabilized sludge and meat and bone meal. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 61, 21-28 https://doi.org/10.17221/59/2013-RAEMužík O., Kára J., Hanzlíková I. (2012): Potenciál cukrovarských řízků pro výrobu bioplynu. Listy Cukrovarnické a Řepařské, 128: 246–250.Ružbarský J., Müller M., Hrabě P. (2014): Analysis of physical and mechanical properties and of gross calorific value of Jatropha curcas seeds and waste from pressing process. Agronomy Research, 12: 603–610.Smutka L., Pulkrábek J., Benešová I. (2014): Současný stav trhu s cukrem ve světě. Listy Cukrovarnické a Řeparské, 130: 70–77.Spagnuolo M., Crecchio C., Pizzigallo M.D.R., Ruggiero P. (1997): Synergistic effects of cellulolytic and pectinolytic enzymes in degrading sugar beet pulp. Bioresource Technology, 60, 215-222 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00013-8Spokas Kurt A., Novak Jeffrey M., Stewart Catherine E., Cantrell Keri B., Uchimiya Minori, DuSaire Martin G., Ro Kyoung S. (2011): Qualitative analysis of volatile organic compounds on biochar. Chemosphere, 85, 869-882 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.108Tekin Kubilay, Karagöz Selhan, Bektaş Sema (2014): A review of hydrothermal biomass processing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, 673-687 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.216Titirici Maria-Magdalena, Antonietti Markus (2009): Chemistry and materials options of sustainable carbon materials made by hydrothermal carbonization. Chemical Society Reviews, 39, 103- https://doi.org/10.1039/b819318p