Effect of water features proximity on farmland prices in a landlocked country: the consequences for planning
P. Sekáč, M. Šálek, A. Wranová, P. Kumble, P. Skleničkahttps://doi.org/10.17221/11/2016-SWRCitation:Sekáč P., Šálek M., Wranová A., Kumble P., Sklenička P. (2017): Effect of water features proximity on farmland prices in a landlocked country: the consequences for planning. Soil & Water Res., 12: 18-28.
Conversion of farmland to non-farm uses significantly influences the spatial variability of farmland prices. We tested 12 factors of land prices that experienced real estate brokers indicated to be the most important determinants for the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. Five factors can be described as landscape, four as geographic, and three as climatic explanatory variables influencing farmland prices. Our results indicate that the two most powerful factors in explaining the sales price per square metre were proximity to a river and proximity to a lake. In both cases, the price of land diminished significantly with the increasing distance from the edge of water bodies, so the prices in their immediate vicinity are 3.5 to 3.7 times higher than the prices of similar lands more than 5 km from the edge of a water body. The other significant factors were population size of the nearest municipality and percentage representation of forest. The fact that the two most powerful factors indicate the distance to a river, brook, lake or pond shows how important are these freshwater features as determinants of farmland prices in a landlocked country such as the Czech Republic, where this study was performed. The consequences of this finding for water resources planning and management are discussed.Keywords:
agricultural land value; land market; land development; water resources planning; real estateReferences:
Acharya G., Bennett L.L. (2001): Valuing open space and land-use patterns in urban watersheds. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22: 221–237.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007843514233Amelung Bas, Viner David (2006): Mediterranean Tourism: Exploring the Future with the Tourism Climatic Index. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 14, 349-366 https://doi.org/10.2167/jost549.0Barnard C.H. (2000): Urbanization affects a large share of farmland. Rural Conditions and Trends, 10: 57–63.Bender André, Din Allan, Favarger Philippe, Hoesli Martin, Laakso Janne (1997): An Analysis of Perceptions Concerning the Environmental Quality of Housing in Geneva. Urban Studies, 34, 503-513 https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098976104Cho Seong-Hoon, Poudyal Neelam C., Roberts Roland K. (2008): Spatial analysis of the amenity value of green open space. Ecological Economics, 66, 403-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.012Faux John, Perry Gregory M. (1999): Estimating Irrigation Water Value Using Hedonic Price Analysis: A Case Study in Malheur County, Oregon. Land Economics, 75, 440- https://doi.org/10.2307/3147189Feenberg D., Mills E.S. (1980): Measuring the Benefits of Water Pollution Abatement. Studies in Urban Economics. New York, Academic Press.Goetgeluk Roland, Kauko Tom, Priemus Hugo (2005): Can Red Pay for Blue? Methods to Estimate the Added Value of Water in Residential Environments. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48, 103-120 https://doi.org/10.1080/0964056042000308175Guiling P., Brorsen B. W., Doye D. (): Effect of Urban Proximity on Agricultural Land Values. Land Economics, 85, 252-264 https://doi.org/10.3368/le.85.2.252Henderson J. (2010): Impact of Wildlife Recreation on Farmland Values. Kansas City, Diane Publishing.Horna J. (1995): The impact of the cold climate on leisure in Canada. World Leisure & Recreation, 37: 10–14.Jennings G. (2007): Water-based Tourism, Sport, Leisure, and Recreation Experiences. Burlington, Elsevier.Kulshreshtha S. N., Gillies J. A. (1993): ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF AESTHETIC AMENITIES: A CASE STUDY OF RIVER VIEW. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 29, 257-266 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1993.tb03206.xLivanis G., Moss C. B., Breneman V. E., Nehring R. F. (2006): Urban Sprawl and Farmland Prices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88, 915-929 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00906.xMcDonald J.F., McMillen D.P. (1998): Land values, land use, and the first Chicago zoning ordinance. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 16: 135–150.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007751616991MIECZKOWSKI Z. (1985): THE TOURISM CLIMATIC INDEX: A METHOD OF EVALUATING WORLD CLIMATES FOR TOURISM. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 29, 220-233 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.1985.tb00365.xMittenzwei Klaus, Lien Gudbrand, Fjellstad Wendy, Øvren Eva, Dramstad Wenche (2010): Effects of landscape protection on farm management and farmers' income in Norway. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 861-868 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.11.002Mooney S., Eisgruber L.M. (2001): The influence of riparian protection measures on residential property values: The case of the Oregon plan for salmon and watersheds. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22: 273–286.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007899716050Muransky P., Nauman P. (1980): Landscape Typology of the Czech Republic According to Type and Scenic Value – a Set of Maps. Prague, Terplan. (in Czech)Naydenov I. (2009): Factors Influencing Farmland Prices in Bulgaria. [M.Sc. Thesis.] Maastricht, Maastricht University.Plantinga Andrew J., Miller Douglas J. (2001): Agricultural Land Values and the Value of Rights to Future Land Development. Land Economics, 77, 56- https://doi.org/10.2307/3146980Perry A.H. (2000): Impacts of Climate Change on Tourism in the Mediterranean: Adaptive Responses. FEEM Nota di Lavoro. Available http://www.feem.it/userfiles/attach/Publication/NDL2000/NDL2000-035.pdf (accessed Feb 2015).Pukkala Timo, Nuutinen Tuula, Kangas Jyrki (1995): Integrating scenic and recreational amenities into numerical forest planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32, 185-195 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)00195-9R Development Core Team. R (2010): A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Rush R., Bruggink T.H. (2000): The value of ocean proximity on barrier island houses. The Appraisal Journal, 62: 142–150.Sklenicka P., Hladik J., Strelecek F., Kottova B., Lososova J., Cihal L., Salek M. (2009): Historical, environmental and socio-economic driving forces on land ownership fragmentation, the land consolidation effect and project costs. Agricultural Economics, 55: 571–582.Sklenicka Petr, Molnarova Kristina, Pixova Katerina C., Salek Miroslav E. (2013): Factors affecting farmland prices in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 30, 130-136 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.03.005Sklenicka Petr, Janovska Vratislava, Salek Miroslav, Vlasak Josef, Molnarova Kristina (2014): The Farmland Rental Paradox: Extreme land ownership fragmentation as a new form of land degradation. Land Use Policy, 38, 587-593 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.006Sklenicka P., Molnarova K., Salek M., Simova P., Vlasak J., Sekac P., Janovska V. (2015): Owner or tenant: Who adopts better soil conservation practices? Land Use Policy, 47: 253–261.Stewart Patrick A., Libby Lawrence W. (1998): Determinants of Farmland Value: The Case of DeKalb County, Illinois. Review of Agricultural Economics, 20, 80- https://doi.org/10.2307/1349535Svobodova Kamila, Sklenicka Petr, Molnarova Kristina, Salek Miroslav (2012): Visual preferences for physical attributes of mining and post-mining landscapes with respect to the sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. Ecological Engineering, 43, 34-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.08.007White Eric M., Morzillo Anita T., Alig Ralph J. (2009): Past and projected rural land conversion in the US at state, regional, and national levels. Landscape and Urban Planning, 89, 37-48 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.09.004Zeithaml Josef, Pižl Václav, Sklenička Petr (2009): Earthworm assemblages in an ecotone between forest and arable field and their relations with soil properties. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 44, 922-926 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2009000800018