Effect of row width on splash erosion and throughfall in silage maize crops

https://doi.org/10.17221/121/2015-SWRCitation:Brant V., Zábranský P., Škeříková M., Pivec J., Kroulík M., Procházka L. (2017): Effect of row width on splash erosion and throughfall in silage maize crops. Soil & Water Res., 12: 39-50.
download PDF
Line width is one of the major factors affecting arable soil erosion. The aim of the study was to assess the effects of different row spacing on splash erosion and throughfall in maize crops. Field measurements of the throughfall (Pth, mm) and splash erosion (MSR, g/m2) were carried out in silage maize crops (row spacing 0.45 and 0.75 m) in 2012–2014. The BBCH growth stages for the crops, plant length (L, m), and leaf area index (LAI) were evaluated. Positive correlation was observed between the aerial precipitation (P, mm) and the Pth values. With increasing P-values, higher levels of Pth were identified in the 0.75 m compared to the 0.45 m row spacing. The value of this proportion was decreasing from the centre of the inter-row (0.75 m) to the row of the plants direction. Statistically significant lower values of splash erosion were observed in the 0.45 m compared with the 0.75 m wide rows, especially within the years 2012 and 2014. The experiments proved the positive influence of the length of plants and LAI on P/Pth values. A decrease of Pth in relation to precipitation values with height of plants and LAI values was observed. This dependency was then confirmed from the beginning of the stem elongation (BBCH 30) to the end of flowering (BBCH 70). Tighter dependency between the plant length (L) and the values of P/Pth ratio in the 0.75 m wide crop rows was determined. Conversely, a more important influence of LAI on the values of P/Pth ratio was estimated in the 0.45 m wide crop rows. The experiments proved the positive influence of the 0.45 m wide rows on the decrease of splash erosion as well as throughfall compared with the 0.75 m row spacing.  
Andrade Fernando H., Calviño Pablo, Cirilo Alfredo, Barbieri Pablo (2002): Yield Responses to Narrow Rows Depend on Increased Radiation Interception. Agronomy Journal, 94, 975-  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0975
Barbieri Pablo A., Rozas Herna´n R.Sainz, Andrade Fernando H., Echeverria Herna´n E. (2000): Row Spacing Effects at Different Levels of Nitrogen Availability in Maize. Agronomy Journal, 92, 283-  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.922283x
Barbieri Pablo A., Echeverría Hernán E., Saínz Rozas Hernán R., Andrade Fernando H. (2008): Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Maize as Affected by Nitrogen Availability and Row Spacing. Agronomy Journal, 100, 1094-  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0057
Bollinne A. (1975): The measurement of the intensity of splash on loamy soils. Soil application technique and first results. Pédologie, 25: 199–210. (in French)
Brandt C.J. (1989): The size distribution of throughfall drops under vegetation canopies. CATENA, 16, 507-524  https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(89)90032-5
Bruckler Laurent, Lafolie François, Doussan Claude, Bussières François (2004): Modeling soil-root water transport with non-uniform water supply and heterogeneous root distribution. Plant and Soil, 260, 205-224  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000030187.33135.b8
Bui Elisabeth N., Box James E. (1992): Stemflow, Rain Throughfall, and Erosion under Canopies of Corn and Sorghum. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56, 242-  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600010037x
Frasson Renato Prata de Moraes, Krajewski Witold F. (2011): Characterization of the drop-size distribution and velocity–diameter relation of the throughfall under the maize canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151, 1244-1251  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.05.001
Frasson Renato Prata de Moraes, Krajewski Witold F. (2013): Rainfall interception by maize canopy: Development and application of a process-based model. Journal of Hydrology, 489, 246-255  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.019
Dekker L.W., Ritsema C.J. (1997): Effect of maize canopy and water repellency on moisture patterns in a Dutch black plaggen soil. Plant and Soil, 195: 339–350.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004262113061
Farnham Dale E. (2001): Row Spacing, Plant Density, and Hybrid Effects on Corn Grain Yield and Moisture. Agronomy Journal, 93, 1049-  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.9351049x
Hudson N. (1995): Soil Conservation. Ames, Iowa State University Press.
Hupet F., Vanclooster M. (2005): Micro-variability of hydrological processes at the maize row scale: implications for soil water content measurements and evapotranspiration estimates. Journal of Hydrology, 303, 247-270  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.07.017
Johnson Gregg A., Hoverstad Thomas R., Greenwald Rene E. (1998): Integrated Weed Management Using Narrow Corn Row Spacing, Herbicides, and Cultivation. Agronomy Journal, 90, 40-  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1998.00021962009000010008x
P. I. A. Kinnell (1991): The Effect Of Flow Depth On Sediment Transport Induced By Raindrops Impacting Shallow Flows. Transactions of the ASAE, 34, 0161-  https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31639
Leguédois Sophie, Planchon Olivier, Legout Cédric, Le Bissonnais Yves (2005): Splash Projection Distance for Aggregated Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 30-  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0030
LfL (2010): Hinweise zur bayerischen Erosionsschutzverordnung (ESchV). Freising, Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft (LfL).
Liu Haijun, Zhang Ruihao, Zhang Liwei, Wang Xuming, Li Yan, Huang Guanhua (2015): Stemflow of water on maize and its influencing factors. Agricultural Water Management, 158, 35-41  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.04.013
Mannering J.V., Johnson C.B. (1969): Effect of Crop Row Spacing on Erosion and Infiltration1. Agronomy Journal, 61, 902-  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1969.00021962006100060022x
Martello Marco, Ferro Nicola, Bortolini Lucia, Morari Francesco (2015): Effect of Incident Rainfall Redistribution by Maize Canopy on Soil Moisture at the Crop Row Scale. Water, 7, 2254-2271  https://doi.org/10.3390/w7052254
Meier U. (ed.) (2001): Growth Stages of Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants. BBCH Monograph, 2nd Ed., Berlin, Braunschweig, Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry.
Miole R.N., Visco R.G., Magcale-Macandog D.B., Abucay E.R., Gascon A.F., Castillo A.S.A. (2011): Growth performance, crop productivity, and water and nutrient flows in Gmelina arborea Roxb. – Zea mays hedgerow systems in Southern Philippines. Philippine Journal of Crop Science, 36: 34–44.
Mohammadi Gholam Reza, Ghobadi Mohammad Eghbal, Sheikheh-Poor Saeed (2012): Phosphate Biofertilizer, Row Spacing and Plant Density Effects on Corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) Yield and Weed Growth. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 03, 425-429  https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2012.34051
Morgan R.P.C. (2005): Soil Erosion and Conservation. 3rd Ed. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.
Neave Mel, Abrahams Athol D. (2002): Vegetation influences on water yields from grassland and shrubland ecosystems in the Chihuahuan Desert. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 27, 1011-1020  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.389
Nübel V. (2008): 75cm Reihenabstand im Maisanbau Zeitgemäß? Saarbrücken, VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
Ottman M. J., Welch L. F. (1989): Planting Patterns and Radiation Interception, Plant Nutrient Concentration, and Yield in Corn. Agronomy Journal, 81, 167-  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100020006x
Paltineanu I.C., Starr J.L. (2000): Preferential Water Flow Through Corn Canopy and Soil Water Dynamics Across Rows. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64, 44-  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.64144x
Parkin T. B., Codling E. E. (1990): Rainfall Distribution under a Corn Canopy: Implications for Managing Agrochemicals. Agronomy Journal, 82, 1166-  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200060028x
Pimentel David (2006): Soil Erosion: A Food and Environmental Threat. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8, 119-137  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-1262-8
Pivec Jan, Brant Václav, Moravec Dalibor (2006): Analysis of the potential evapotranspiration demands in the Czech Republic between 1961–1990. Biologia, 61, -  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0176-8
Poesen J., Torri D. (1988): The effect of cup size on splash detachment and transport measurements: Part I. Field measurements. Catena, 12: 113–126.
QUANSAH C. (1981): THE EFFECT OF SOIL TYPE, SLOPE, RAIN INTENSITY AND THEIR INTERACTIONS ON SPLASH DETACHMENT AND TRANSPORT. Journal of Soil Science, 32, 215-224  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1981.tb01701.x
N. W. Quinn , J. M. Laflen (1983): Characteristics of Raindrop Throughfall Under Corn Canopy. Transactions of the ASAE, 26, -  https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34148
Richter G. (1998): Bodenerosion. Analyse und Bilanz eines Umweltproblems. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Sangoi L., Salvador R.J. (1998): Influence of plant height and leaf number on maize production at high plant densities. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 33: 297–306.
Sharma P.P., Gupta S.C., Rawls W.J. (1991): Soil Detachment by Single Raindrops of Varying Kinetic Energy. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55, 301-  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500020001x
Uppenkamp N. (2007): Praxiserfahrungen mit der Maisengsaat. Mais, 34: 26–28.
VAN DIJK P. M., VAN DER ZIJP M., KWAAD F. J. P. M. (1996): SOIL ERODIBILITY PARAMETERS UNDER VARIOUS CROPPING SYSTEMS OF MAIZE. Hydrological Processes, 10, 1061-1067  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199608)10:8<1061::AID-HYP411>3.0.CO;2-V
van Dijk A. I. J. M., Meesters A. G. C. A., Bruijnzeel L. A. (2002): Exponential Distribution Theory and the Interpretation of Splash Detachment and Transport Experiments. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 1466-  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.1466
Wainwright John (1996): Infiltration, runoff and erosion characteristics of agricultural land in extreme storm events, SE France. CATENA, 26, 27-47  https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(95)00033-X
Zábranský P., Brant V., Pivec J., Gemerlová M., Kroulík M. (2013): The influence of the structure stands maize sown in the distribution of rainfall. In: Vliv abiotických a biotických stresorů na vlastnosti rostlin 2013. Prague, CRI: 310–313.
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti