Land use analysis in terms of farmland protection in the Czech Republiců J., Sekáč P., Baráková J., Kozák J. (2016): Land use analysis in terms of farmland protection in the Czech Republic. Soil & Water Res., 11: 20-28.
download PDF
The agricultural land acreage in Central Europe, including the Czech Republic, rapidly decreases. This study presents the trends of agricultural land acreage reduction in the period 1966–2013, with respect to the 1990 milestone (political changes triggering a rapid loss of agricultural land for construction purposes). The analysis is based on the cadastral register data. Particularly serious is the rapid reduction of arable land – 25 ha per day. Furthermore, the actual built up area seems to be larger than show the records on the construction land in the cadastral register. There is an obvious discrepancy between the real state and the cadastral data, so the actual reduction of arable land in the Czech Republic may be even greater. Unfortunately, some municipalities responsible for the urban planning process are obviously not interested in land protection. Based on their quality, the Czech land protection law classifies the soils into 5 protection classes. The areas with the first and second class soils should not be used for construction purposes. However, the study revealed the law is frequently neglected from the part of municipalities and the areas of best quality soils have often been sealed by construction. The present study also attempted to enumerate the financial losses from crop production associated with the land take. The ineffective land protection is a very serious Europe-wide problem.
Anonymous (1992): Richtlinien zur Bemessung der Abgabe bei Eingriffen in Natur und Landschaft. Wiesbaden, Hessisches Ministerium für Landesentwicklung, Wohnen, Landwirtschaft, Forsten und Naturschutz.
Artmann M. (2014a): Institutional efficiency of urban soil sealing management – from raising awareness to better implementation of sustainable development in Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning 131: 83–95.
Artmann M. (2014b): Assessment of soil sealing management responses, strate-gies and targets towards ecologically sustainable urban land use management. Ambio, 43: 530–541.
Bouma Johan, McBratney Alex (2013): Framing soils as an actor when dealing with wicked environmental problems. Geoderma, 200-201, 130-139
Bouma J, Varallyay G, Batjes N.H (1998): Principal land use changes anticipated in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 67, 103-119
European Commission (2006): Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. Brussels, European Commission.
European Commission (2012): Guidelines on Best Practice to Limit, Mitigate or Com-pensate Soil Sealing. Luxembourg, European Union.
Federal Environmental Agency (2010): Information 26 October 2010. Increase in Settlement and Transport Areas between 1993 and 2009. Available at
Herrick J.E. (2000): Soil quality: an indicator of sustainable land management? Applied Soil Ecology, 15: 75–83.
Hindls R., Hronová S., Seger J. (2003): Statistics for Economists. 3rd Ed. Prague, Professional Publishing. (in Czech)
Kozák J., Němeček J., Borůvka L., Kodešová R., Janků J., Jacko J., Hladík J. (2010): Soil Atlas of the Czech Republic. Prague, CULS.
Liu Tao, Liu Hui, Qi Yuanjing (2015): Construction land expansion and cultivated land protection in urbanizing China: Insights from national land surveys, 1996–2006. Habitat International, 46, 13-22
Lokocz Elizabeth, Ryan Robert L., Sadler Anna Jarita (2011): Motivations for land protection and stewardship: Exploring place attachment and rural landscape character in Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99, 65-76
Malucelli Francesco, Certini Giacomo, Scalenghe Riccardo (2014): Soil is brown gold in the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy. Land Use Policy, 39, 350-357
Monturiol F., Alcala L. (1990): Map of Potential Capacity – Agricultural Use of the Community of Madrid. Scale 1: 200 000. 1st Ed. Madrid, C.A.M. – C.S.I.C. (in Spanish)
Nestroy Othmar (2006): Soil sealing in Austria and its consequences. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 6, 171-173
Nuissl H., Schroeter-Schlaack C. (2009): On the economic approach to the con-tainment of land consumption. Environmental Science & Policy, 12: 270–280.
Olbrichová A. (2008): Crop versus concrete. Economist, 52: 46–49. (in Czech)
Pitt M. (2008): The Pitt Review – Learning Lessons from the 2007 Floods. London, Cabinet Office. Available at
García Rodríguez Pilar, Pérez González M Eugenia (2007): Changes in soil sealing in Guadalajara (Spain): Cartography with LANDSAT images. Science of The Total Environment, 378, 209-213
Scalenghe Riccardo, Marsan Franco Ajmone (2009): The anthropogenic sealing of soils in urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 90, 1-10
Seják J., Dejmal I. (2003): Evaluation and Assessment of Biotops of the Czech Republic. Prague, Český ekologický ústav. Available at (in Czech)
Smith Pete, House Joanna I., Bustamante Mercedes, Sobocká Jaroslava, Harper Richard, Pan Genxing, West Paul C., Clark Joanna M., Adhya Tapan, Rumpel Cornelia, Paustian Keith, Kuikman Peter, Cotrufo M. Francesca, Elliott Jane A., McDowell Richard, Griffiths Robert I., Asakawa Susumu, Bondeau Alberte, Jain Atul K., Meersmans Jeroen, Pugh Thomas A. M. (2015): Global change pressures on soils from land use and management. Global Change Biology, , n/a-n/a
Xu Guoliang, Huang Xianjin, Zhong Taiyang, Chen Yi, Wu Changyan, Jin Yuze (2015): Assessment on the effect of city arable land protection under the implementation of China's National General Land Use Plan (2006–2020). Habitat International, 49, 466-473
Zhang Weiwen, Wang Wen, Li Xuewen, Ye Fangzhi (2014): Economic development and farmland protection: An assessment of rewarded land conversion quotas trading in Zhejiang, China. Land Use Policy, 38, 467-476
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti