Tillage and crop rotation effects on soil carbon and selected soil physical properties in a Haplic Cambisol in Eastern Cape, South Africa

https://doi.org/10.17221/176/2018-SWRCitation:Mtyobile M., Muzangwa L., Mnkeni P.N.S. (2020): Tillage and crop rotation effects on soil carbon and selected soil physical properties in a Haplic Cambisol in Eastern Cape, South Africa. Soil & Water Res., 15: 47-54.
download PDF

The effects of tillage and crop rotation on the soil carbon, the soil bulk density, the porosity and the soil water content were evaluated during the 6th season of an on-going field trial at the University of Fort Hare Farm (UFH), South Africa. Two tillage systems; conventional tillage (CT) and no-till and crop rotations; maize (Zea mays L.)-fallow-maize (MFM), maize-fallow-soybean (Glycine max L.) (MFS); maize-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-maize (MWM) and  maize-wheat-soybean (MWS) were evaluated. The field experiment was a 2 × 4 factorial, laid out in a randomised complete design. The crop residues were retained for the no-till plots and incorporated for the CT plots, after each cropping season. No significant effects (P > 0.05) of the tillage and crop rotation on the bulk density were observed. However, the values ranged from 1.32 to1.37 g/cm3. Significant interaction effects of the tillage and crop rotation were observed on the soil porosity (P < 0.01) and the soil water content (P < 0.05). The porosity for the MFM and the MWS, was higher under the CT whereas for the MWM and the MWS, it was higher under the no-till. However, the greatest porosity was under the MWS. Whilst the no-till significantly increased (P < 0.05) the soil water content compared to the CT; the greatest soil water content was observed when the no-till was combined with the MWM rotations. The soil organic carbon (SOC) was increased more (P < 0.05) by the no-till than the CT, and the MFM consistently had the least SOC compared with the rest of the crop rotations, at all the sampling depths (0–5, 5–10 and 10–20 cm). The soil bulk density negatively correlated with the soil porosity and the soil water content, whereas the porosity positively correlated with the soil water content. The study concluded that the crop rotations, the MWM and the MWS under the no-till coupled with the residue retention improved the soil porosity and the soil water content levels the most.

References:
Acharya C.L., Hati K.M., Bandyopadhyay K.K. (2005): Mulches. In: Encyclopaedia of Soils in the Environment. Amsterdam, Elsevier: 521–533.
 
Allen M., Lachnicht S.L., Mccartney D., Parmelee R.W. (1997): Characteristics of macro porosity in a reduced tillage agro-ecosystem with manipulated earthworm populations: implications for infiltration and nutrient transport. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29: 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00106-X
 
Alvarez R., Steinbach H.S. (2009): A review of the effects of tillage systems on some soil physical properties, water content, nitrate availability and crops yield in the Argentine Pampas. Soil and Tillage Research, 104: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.02.005
 
Awe G.O., ReichertJ.M., Timm L.C., Wendroth O.O. (2014): Temporal processes of soil water status in a sugarcane field under residue management. Plant and Soil, 387: 395–411.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2304-5
 
Borresen T. (1999): The effect of straw management and reduced tillage on soil properties and crop yields of spring-sown cereals on two loam soils in Norway. Soil and Tillage Research, 51: 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00030-6
 
Bot A., Benites J. (2005): The Importance of Soil Organic Matter Key to Drought-resistant Soil and Sustained Food and Production. Rome, FAO.
 
Costa E.A., Goedert W., Sousa D.M.G. (2006): Soil quality under tillage cropping systems. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 41: 1185–1191. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2006000700016
 
Department of Agriculture (2003). Maize Production. Pretoria, National Department of Agriculture, Government Printers. Available at http://www.arc.agric.za/arc-gci/Fact%20Sheets%20Library/Maize%20Production.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2017).
 
Eash N.S., Karen D.L., Parkin T.B. (1994): Fungal contribution to soil aggregation and soil quality. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 35: 221–227.
 
Eluozo S.N. (2013): Predictive model to monitor the rate of bulk density in fine and coarse soil formation influenced variation of porosity in coastal area of Port Harcourt. American Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Research, 1: 115–127.
 
Gomez K.A., Gomez A.A. (1984): Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed., Singapore, Wiley Inter-science Publication.
 
Gwenzi W., Gotosa J., Chakanetsa S. (2009): Effects of tillage systems on soil organic carbon dynamics, structural stability and crop yields in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) rotations in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 83: 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-008-9211-1
 
Halvorson A.D., Wienhold B.J., Black A.L. (2002): Tillage, nitrogen, and cropping system effects on soil carbon sequestration. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66: 906–912. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.9060
 
Heine M.H., Van Rensburg L.D., Du Preez C.C. (2011): Decomposition Rates of Crop Residues under an Irrigated No-tillage Practice. Bloemfontein, Department of Soil, Crop and Climate Sciences, University of the Free State, South Africa.
 
Hobbs P.R., Sayre K., Gupta R. (2008): The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363: 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2169
 
Huggins D.R., Allmaras R.R., Clapp C.E., Lamb J.A., Randall G.W. (2007): Corn-soybean sequence and tillage effects on soil carbon dynamics and storage. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71: 145–154. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0231
 
Indoria A.K., Srinivasa R.C.H., Sharma K.L., Sammi R.K. (2017): Conservation agriculture – a panacea to improve soil physical health. Current Science, 112: 52–61. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v112/i01/52-61
 
IUSS Working Group WRB (2006): World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006. 2nd Ed., World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. Rome, FAO.
 
Jemai I., Aissa B.N., Guirat B.S. Hammouda M.B., Gallali T. (2013): Impact of three and seven years of no-tillage on the soil water storage in the plant root zone under a subhumid Tunisian climate. Soil and Tillage Research, 126: 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.07.008
 
Kavdir Y., Rasse D.P., Smucker A.J.M. (2005): Specific contributions of decaying alfalfa roots to nitrate leaching in a Kalamazoo loam soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 109: 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.02.020
 
Kesik T., Baewicz-Woÿniak M., Wach D. (2010): Influence of conservation tillage in onion production on the soil organic matter content and soil aggregate formation. International Agrophysics, 24: 267–273.
 
Lipiec J., Kús J., Słowińska-Jurkiewicz A., Nosalewicz A. (2006): Soil porosity and water infiltration as influenced by tillage methods. Soil and Tillage Research, 89: 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.07.012
 
McVay K.A., Budde J.A., Fabrizzi K., Mikha M.M., Rice C.W., Schlegel A.J. (2006): Management effects on soil physical properties in long-term tillage studies in Kansas. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70: 434–438. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0249
 
Mielke L.N., Wilhelm W.W. (1998): Comparisons of soil physical characteristics in long-term tillage winter wheat fallow tillage experiments. Soil and Tillage Research, 49: 29−35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00152-4
 
Munkholm L.J., Heck R.J., Deen B. (2013): Long-term rotation and tillage effects on soil structure and crop yield. Soil and Tillage Research, 127: 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.02.007
 
Njaimwe A.N. (2010): Tillage and Crop Rotation Impact on Soil Quality Parameters and Maize Yield in Zanyokwe Irrigation Scheme, South Africa. [PhD. Thesis.] Alice, University of Fort Hare.
 
Olivier F.C., Singels A. (2012): The effect of crop residue layers on evapotranspiration, growth and yield of irrigated sugarcane. Water SA, 38: 77–86. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v38i1.10
 
Pagliai M., Vignozzi N., Pellegrini S. (2004): Soil structure and the effect of management enterprises. Soil and Tillage Research, 79: 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.07.002
 
Palmer T., Ainslie A. (2006): Country Pasture/Forage Resource Profiles: South Africa. Pretoria, Department of Agriculture, Republic of South Africa.
 
Saha S., Chakraborty D., Sharma A.R., Tomar R.K., Bhadraray S., Sen U., Behera U.K., Purakayastha T.J., Garg R.N., Kalra N. (2010): Effect of tillage and residue management on soil physical properties and crop productivity in maize (Zea mays)-Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 80: 679–685.
 
Soil Classification Working Group (1991): Soil Classification: a Taxonomic System for South Africa. Memoirs on the Agricultural Natural Resources of South Africa No. 15. Pretoria, Department of Agricultural Development.
 
USDA Soil Taxonomy (1999): A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Pittsburgh, United States Department of Agriculture.
 
Van Donk S.J., Martin D.L., Irmak S., Melvin S.R., Petersen J.L., Davison D.R. (2010): Crop residue cover effects on evaporation, soil water content, and yield of deficit-irrigated corn in West-central Nebraska. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 53: 1787–1797. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.35805
 
Velykis A., Satkus A. (2005): Soil protection value of winter crops and reduced tillage on clay loams. Agronomy Research, 3: 211–218.
 
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences