An approach to identifying and evaluating the potential formation of ephemeral gullies in the conditions of the Czech Republic

https://doi.org/10.17221/231/2018-SWRCitation:Dumbrovsky M., Drbal K., Sobotková V., Uhrová J. (2020): An approach to identifying and evaluating the potential formation of ephemeral gullies in the conditions of the Czech Republic. Soil & Water Res., 15: 38-46.
download PDF

Soil erosion, including ephemeral gully erosion, is a serious degradation process in the Czech Republic. It currently threatens more than half of the agricultural acreage through negative changes in the whole complex of soil properties. The unfavourable consequences of surface runoff are seen in the erosion processes degrading agricultural soils. The South Moravia Region was selected as the case study area – mainly for its natural conditions and high soil degradation risk . A set of data, collected from 2012 to 2017 in a maize-growing area, especially on deep loess soils in the South Moravia Region, was used to analyse the morphological characteristics of the ephemeral gullies (EGs). The relationship was confirmed between the ephemeral gully (EG) length and the size of its contributing drainage area in accordance with studies conducted in other countries. It is also important that the closest relationship was confirmed between the length of the gully and its calculated volume. Dependence was sought on the data of 51 cases of the detailed, measured and evaluated EGs. These results will become the basis for finding a predictive relationship and the quantification of EG erosion. Locating EGs and predicting their length is crucial for estimating the sediment load and planning conservation strategies. The aim of this paper is to contribute to the understanding of this issue, i.e., define and verify the basic crucial causal factors and propose guidelines for locating the potential EG occurrence and predicting the sediment load. A research effort to better understand the EG mechanism and causal factors over a wide range of watershed conditions is fundamental to the establishment of basic rules for the adoption of optimal conservation strategies.

 

References:
Bruno C., Di Stefano C., Ferro V. (2008): Field investigation on rilling in the experimental Sparacia area, South Italy. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 33: 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1544
 
Capra A., Di Stefano C., Ferro V., Scicolone B. (2009): Similarity between morphological characteristics of rills and ephemeral gullies in Sicily, Italy. Hydrological Processes, 23: 3334–3341. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7437
 
Casalí J., Lopez J.J., Giraldez J.V. (1999): Ephemeral gully erosion in southern Navarre (Spain). Catena, 36: 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00013-2
 
ČÚZK (2018): WMS View Service – Orthophoto. Geoportal ČÚZK. Available at https://geoportal.cuzk.cz (accessed January 2019). (in Czech)
 
Daggupati P., Douglas-Mankin K.R., Sheshukov A.Y. (2013): Predicting ephemeral gully location and length using topographic index models. Transactions of the ASABE, 56: 1427–1440.
 
Dumbrovský M., Sobotková V., Pavlík F., Uhrová J. (2009): Evaluation of the impacts of floods on the landscape and the environment. In: Evaluation of Floods in June and July 2009 in the Czech Republic. Prague, Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic: 117–125. Available at http://voda.chmi.cz/pov09/doc/01.pdf (accessed August 2018). (in Czech)
 
Ekotoxa (2011): Determination of Contributing Areas Over the Sealing Profiles of Erosively Threatened Arable Drainage Pathways for Needs of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC. Opava, EKOTOXA s.r.o. (in Czech)
 
Foster G.R. (1986): Understanding ephemeral gully erosion. Chapter 4. In: Soil Conservation: Assessing the National Resource Inventory. Washington, D.C., National academies Press: 90–125.
 
Foster G.R. (2005): Modeling ephemeral gully erosion for conservation planning. International Journal of Sediment Research, 20: 157–175.
 
Holý M. (1994): Erosion and the Environment. Prague, ČVUT. (in Czech)
 
Janeček M. et al. (2012): Protecting Agricultural Land from Erosion: Methodology. Prague, CULS. (in Czech)
 
Knapen A., Poesen J.W.A. (2010): Soil erosion resistance effects on rill and gully initiation points and dimensions. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35: 217–228.
 
Laflen J.M., Watson D.A., Franti T.G. (1986): Ephemeral gully erosion. In: Proc. 4th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conf. Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, Subcommittee on Sedimentation, Las Vegas, March 24–27, 1986: 3-29−3-37.
 
Nachtergaele J., Poesen J. (2002): Spatial and temporal variations in resistance of loess-derived soils to ephemeral gully erosion. European Journal of Soil Science, 53: 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2002.00443.x
 
Øygarden L. (2003): Rill and gully development during an extreme winter runoff event in Norway. Catena, 50: 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(02)00138-8
 
Poesen J.W.A., De Luna E., Franca A., Nachtergaele J., Govers G. (1999): Concentrated flow erosion rates as affected by rock fragment cover and initial soil moisture content. Catena, 36: 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00044-2
 
Poesen J.W.A., Nachtergaele J., Verstraeten G., Valentin C. (2003): Gully erosion and environmental change: Importance and research needs. Catena, 50: 91–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(02)00143-1
 
Poesen J.W.A., Torri D.B., Vanwalleghem T. (2011): Gully erosion: procedures to adopt when modelling soil erosion in landscapes affected by gullying. In: Morgan R.P.C., Nearing M.A. (eds.): Handbook of Erosion Modelling. Chichester, Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.: 360–386.
 
Ranger G.E., Frank F.F. (1978): The 3-F Erosion Bridge – A New Tool for Measuring Soil Erosion. Publication No. 23. Sacramento, Department of Forestry.
 
Smith L.M. (1993): Investigation of Ephemeral Gullies in Loessial Soils in Mississippi. Vicksburg, Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
 
Sobotka J. (2017): Designing on the new elevation database of the Czech Republic. Key Engineering Materials, 755: 333–339. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.755.333
 
Sobotková V., Dumbrovský M. (2014): The new volumetric approach for field measurements of rill erosion. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 4: 94–99.
 
Sobotková V., Dumbrovský M., Sobotka J. (2015): The methods for field assessment of rill erosion in the Czech Republic. In: Proc. 15th Int. Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM. Albena, June 18–24, 2015: 371–378.
 
Steegen A., Govers G., Nachtergaele J., Takken I., Beuse-linck L., Poesen J. (2000): Sediment export by water from an agricultural catchment in the Loam Belt of central Belgium. Geomorphology, 33: 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00108-7
 
Vandaele K., Poesen J.W.A., Govers G., Wesemael B. (1996): Geomorphic threshold conditions for ephemeral gully incision. Geomorphology, 16: 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(95)00141-Q
 
Vandekerckhove L., Poesen J.W.A., Wijdenes D.O. (2000): Thresholds for gully initiation and sedimentation in Mediterranean Europe. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 25: 1201–1220. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9837(200010)25:11<1201::AID-ESP131>3.0.CO;2-L
 
Zevenbergen L.W., Thorne C.R. (1987): Quantitative analysis of land surface topography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 12: 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290120107
 
Zhang Y., Wu Y., Liu B., Zheng Q., Yin J. (2007): Characteristics and factors controlling the development of ephemeral gullies in cultivated catchments of black soil region, Northeast China. Soil and Tillage Research, 96: 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2007.02.010
 
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences