Investigation of the effect of soil mineral composition on soil organic matter stability
N. Czirbus, T. Nyilas, B. Raucsik, M. Hetényihttps://doi.org/10.17221/47/2015-SWRCitation:Czirbus N., Nyilas T., Raucsik B., Hetényi M. (2016): Investigation of the effect of soil mineral composition on soil organic matter stability. Soil & Water Res., 11: 147-154.
The soil organic matter (SOM) pools with different stability play different roles in the agricultural and environmental processes, e.g. in the global carbon cycle. In this work Rock-Eval (RE) pyrolysis measurements and mathematical deconvolution of RE pyrograms were used for determining the abundance, quality, and main biological sources of SOM, as well as for evaluating the relative proportion of the labile (fresh plant and litter) and resistant (lignin and cellulose) bio-macromolecules, immature (humic substances) and mature refractory (naturally stable biological compounds, organic matter stabilized by physico-chemical processes and black carbon) geo-macromolecules. The samples were taken from the A-horizons of Leptosol, Luvisol, and Acrisol formed under different soil conditions (mineral composition, pH, and leaching). In agreement with the present vegetation, bulk RE data together with the results from the mathematical deconvolution of pyrograms display terrigeneous plant remnants as precursors of SOM for all the three samples. The presence of the more stable components, indicated by our results in the A-horizon only of Luvisol and Acrisol, could be a consequence of the intense leaching. In contrast, due to the limited leaching, the soluble components also remained in the A-horizon of Leptosol, for this reason SOM seems to be relatively well preserved. The comparison of the results measured and calculated on whole soil samples and their mineral-free hydrolysis-resistant macromolecular fractions (ROM) reveals that the stabilization of SOM is mainly controlled by organo-mineral association in Leptosol and Luvisol. These results suggest the importance of iron-oxides and -hydroxides and clay minerals in the stabilization of SOM for Leptosol and Luvisol, respectively, whereas in Acrisol the stability of SOM is due to the high relative contribution of naturally stable organic compounds.Keywords:
organo-mineral association; Rock-Eval pyrolysis; thermal stabilityReferences:
Bruun T.B., Elberling B., Christensen B.T. (2010): Lability of soil organic carbon in tropical soils with differenet clay minerals. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 42: 888–895.Carrie Jesse, Sanei Hamed, Stern Gary (2012): Standardisation of Rock–Eval pyrolysis for the analysis of recent sediments and soils. Organic Geochemistry, 46, 38-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.01.011Dean W.E. Jr. (1974): Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: Comparison with other methods. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 44: 242–248.Disnar J.R., Guillet B., Keravis D., Di-Giovanni C., Sebag D. (2003): Soil organic matter (SOM) characterization by Rock-Eval pyrolysis: scope and limitations. Organic Geochemistry, 34, 327-343 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(02)00239-5Eusterhues Karin, Rumpel Cornelia, Kleber Markus, Kögel-Knabner Ingrid (2003): Stabilisation of soil organic matter by interactions with minerals as revealed by mineral dissolution and oxidative degradation. Organic Geochemistry, 34, 1591-1600 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2003.08.007FAO (2006): World Reference Base for Soil Resources. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103, 128, Rome, FAO.Gleixner G., Czimczik C.J., Kramer C., Lühker B., Schmidt M.W.I. (2001): Plant compounds and their turnover and stabilization as soil organic matter. In: Global Biogeochemical Cycles in the Climate System. London, Academic Press: 201–213.Heimann Martin, Reichstein Markus (2008): Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and climate feedbacks. Nature, 451, 289-292 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06591HETÉNYI M., NYILAS T. (2014): Soil Organic Matter Characterization Using S3 and S4 Signals from Rock-Eval Pyrolysis. Pedosphere, 24, 563-574 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(14)60042-4Hetényi M., Nyilas T., Tóth T.M. (2005): Stepwise Rock-Eval pyrolysis as a tool for typing heterogeneous organic matter in soils. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 74, 45-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2004.11.012Lafargue E., Marquis F., Pillot D. (1998): Rock-Eval 6 Applications in Hydrocarbon Exploration, Production, and Soil Contamination Studies. Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 53, 421-437 https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:1998036Lutzow M. v., Kogel-Knabner I., Ekschmitt K., Matzner E., Guggenberger G., Marschner B., Flessa H. (2006): Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions - a review. European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 426-445 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00809.xMikutta R., Kleber M., Torn M.S., Jahn R. (2006): Stabilization of soil organic matter: association with minerals or chemical recalcitrance? Biogeochemistry, 77: 25–56.Nyilas T., Tóth T.M., Hetényi M. (2008): Quantification of soil organic matter degradation by Rock-Eval pyrolysis. Cereal Research Communications, 36: 2007–2010.Quénéa K., Derenne S., Largeau C., Rumpel C., Mariotti A. (2005): Spectroscopic and pyrolytic features and abundance of the macromolecular refractory fraction in a sandy acid forest soil (Landes de Gascogne, France). Organic Geochemistry, 36, 349-362 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.10.005Sebag D., Disnar J. R., Guillet B., Di Giovanni C., Verrecchia E. P., Durand A. (2006): Monitoring organic matter dynamics in soil profiles by 'Rock-Eval pyrolysis': bulk characterization and quantification of degradation. European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 344-355 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00745.xStefanovits P., Filep Gy., Füleky Gy. (1999): Soil Science. Budapest, Mezőgazda Kiadó: 469 p. (in Hungarian)Tambach Tim J., Veld Harry, Griffioen Jasper (2009): Influence of HCl/HF treatment on organic matter in aquifer sediments: A Rock-Eval pyrolysis study. Applied Geochemistry, 24, 2144-2151 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.09.004Tombácz Etelka, Libor Zsuzsanna, Illés Erzsébet, Majzik Andrea, Klumpp Erwin (2004): The role of reactive surface sites and complexation by humic acids in the interaction of clay mineral and iron oxide particles. Organic Geochemistry, 35, 257-267 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2003.11.002Tonon G., Sohi S., Francioso O., Ferrari E., Montecchio D., Gioacchini P., Ciavatta C., Panzacchi P., Powlson D. (2010): Effect of soil pH on the chemical composition of organic matter in physically separated soil fractions in two broadleaf woodland sites at Rothamsted, UK. European Journal of Soil Science, 61, 970-979 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01310.xWattel-Koekkoek E.J.W, van Genuchten P.P.L, Buurman P, van Lagen B (2001): Amount and composition of clay-associated soil organic matter in a range of kaolinitic and smectitic soils. Geoderma, 99, 27-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00062-8Zegouagh Y, Derenne S, Dignac M.F, Baruiso E, Mariotti A, Largeau C (2004): Demineralisation of a crop soil by mild hydrofluoric acid treatment. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 71, 119-135 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(03)00059-7