Industrial zones and their benefits for society

https://doi.org/10.17221/59/2020-SWRCitation:

Janků J., Heřmanová K., Kozák J., Jehlička J., Maitah M., Němeček K., Vopravil J., Toth D., Jacko K., Herza T. (2020): Industrial zones and their benefits for society. Soil & Water Res., 15: 258−272.

download PDF

Currently, we can see a rapid decline of agricultural land with new uses, especially for construction purposes. This negative trend is evident across Europe, the Czech Republic has the fastest loss of land in the EU. One reason for the significant loss of agricultural land is building industrial zones, which utilises of greenfield areas, and their occupying new areas of agricultural land, often the most the most fertile. The analysis deals with the occupied area (the area of a particular industrial zone), the percentage utilisation of that industrial zone, the number of employees in the industrial zone, and the land quality expressed by means of the agricultural land protection class. The results of the analysis show the low usability of industrial zones, the large occupation of the agricultural land, and the low benefits to the Czech state and Czech citizens. The results also show the poor land use policy in relation to the soil protection. This work is followed by the project Sustainable management of natural resources with an emphasis on non-production and production ability of the soil, the results of which will be included in legislation and be binding for spatial planning.

References:
Anonymous (2007): Business and Infrastructure Support Program. Prague, Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic. Available at http://www.mpo.cz/dokument34491.html (accessed April 28, 2019). (in Czech)
 
Anonymous (2016): Regional Information Server. Prague, Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic. Available at http://www.risy.cz/cs (accessed April 26, 2019). (in Czech)
 
Brody S.D., Gunn J., Peacock W., Highfield W.E. (2011a): Examining the influence of development patterns on flood damages along the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31: 438–448.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11419515
 
Brody S.D., Highfield W.E., Kang J.E. (2011b): Rising Waters: The Causes and Consequences of Flooding in the United States. Cambridge-New York, Cambridge University Press.
 
European Environment Agency (2006): Urban Sprawl in Europe – The Ignored Challenge. EEA Report No 10/2006. Copenhagen, European Environmental Agency. Available at https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2006_10/eea_report_10_2006.pdf/view (accessed March 10, 2019)
 
Grekousis G., Manetos P., Photis Y.N. (2013): Modeling urban evolution using neural networks, fuzzy logic and GIS: The case of the Athens metropolitan area. Cities, 30: 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.03.006
 
IUSS Working Group WRB (2015): World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. Update 2015. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. Rome, FAO.
 
Janků J., Jakšík O., Kozák J., Marhoul A.M. (2016): Estimation of land loss in the Czech Republic in the near future. Soil and Water Research, 11: 155−162.  https://doi.org/10.17221/40/2016-SWR
 
Klika J., Novák V., Gregor A. (1954): Practicum of phytocenology, ecology, climatology and soil. Prague, Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences. (in Czech)
 
Lambin E.F., Meyfroidt P. (2010): Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy, 27: 108–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.003
 
Lee Y., Brody S.D. (2018): Examining the impact of land use on flood losses in Seoul, Korea. Land Use Policy, 70: 500–509.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.019
 
Martin L.E., Sorice M.G., Kreuter U.P. (2013): Understanding and influencing urban residents’ knowledge about wildland management in Austin, Texas. Urban Ecosystems, 16: 33–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0177-4
 
Matthai H.F. (1990): Floods. In: Wolman M.G., Riggs H.C. (eds.): The Geology of North America. Vol. 0-1. Surface Water Hydrology. Boulder, Geological Society of America: 97–120.
 
Mileti D.S., Gailus J.L. (2005): Sustainable development and hazards mitigation in the United States: disasters by design revisited. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 10: 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-0057-4
 
Needham B., Louw E., Metzemakers P. (2013): An economic theory for industrial land policy. Land Use Policy, 33: 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.01.005
 
Oueslati W., Alvanides S., Garrod G. (2015): Determinants of urban sprawl in European cities. Urban Studies, 52: 1594–1614.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015577773
 
Salvati L., Morelli V.G. (2014): Unveiling urban sprawl in the Mediterranean region: towards a latent urban transformation? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38: 1935–1953.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12135
 
Salvati L., Carlucci M. (2016): Patterns of sprawl: the socioeconomic and territorial profile of dispersed urban areas in Italy. Regional Studies, 50: 1346–1359.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1009435
 
Salvati L., Zambon I., Chelli F.M., Serra P. (2018): Do spatial patterns of urbanization and land consumption reflect different socioeconomic contexts in Europe. Science of the Total Environment, 625: 722–730.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.341
 
Solon J. (2009): Spatial context of urbanization: Landscape pattern and changes between 1950 and 1990 in the Warsaw metropolitan area, Poland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 93: 250–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.012
 
Sorice M.G., Haider W., Conner J.R., Ditton R.B. (2011): Incentive structure of and private landowner participation in an endangered species conservation program. Conservation Biology, 25: 587–596.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01673.x
 
Ustaoglu E., Perpiňa Castillo C., Jacobs-Crisioni C., Lavalle C. (2016): Economic evaluation of agricultural land to assess land use changes. Land Use Policy, 56: 125–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.020
 
Valla M., Kozák J., Němeček J., Matula S., Borůvka L., Drábek O. (2000): Soil Science Laboratory Manual. Prague, Czech University of Life Sciences. (in Czech)
 
Weilenmann B., Seidl I., Schulz T. (2017): The socio-economic determinants of urban sprawl between 1980 and 2010 in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157: 468–482.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.002
 
Zbíral J., Honsa I., Malý S., Váňa M. (2010): Uniform Working Procedures. Soil Analysis I. 3rd Ed. Brno, Central Inspection and Testing Institute of Agriculture. (in Czech)
 
Zitti M., Ferrara C., Perini L., Carlucci M., Salvati L. (2015): Long-term urban growth and land use efficiency in southern Europe: implications for sustainable land management. Sustainability, 7: 3359–3385.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su7033359
 
Žalud Z., Trnka M., Hlavinka P., Bláhová M., Dobrovolný P., Klem K., Kudláčková L., Kusá H., Možný M., Muhlbachová G., Pavlík F., Ružek P., Štěpánek P., Vopravil J., Zahradníček P. (2019): Agricultural Drought in the Czech Republic – Development, Impacts and Adaptation. Prague, Czech Agrarian Chamber.
 
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti