Evaluation of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients of maize using weighing lysimeter

https://doi.org/10.17221/63/2014-SWRCitation:Abedinpour M. (2015): Evaluation of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients of maize using weighing lysimeter. Soil & Water Res., 10: 99-104.
download PDF
Weighing lysimeters are used to measure crop evapotranspiration (ETC) during the growing season. A ratio of crop evapotranspiration to reference evapotranspiration (ETo) determines a crop coefficient (Kc) value, which is related to a specific crop growth development stage. Determination of Kc is important for estimating crop irrigation requirements using meteorological data from weather stations. The research was conducted to determine growth-stage-specific Kc and compare them to existing FAO Kc values by investigating water use of maize (Zea mays L.) at the Water Technology Center Research Field in the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, India in 2010. Three lysimeters, weighing about 3.5 t, contained undisturbed 1.5 m deep soil monoliths. Accumulated seasonal crop water use was about 411 mm and the Kc values determined for maize during the growing season varied from 0.53 to 1.21. The calculated and measured evapotranspiration values were compared to assess the performance of the crop coefficient. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), the ratio of the root mean square error to the standard deviation of measured data (RSR), the root mean square error (RMSE) itself, and the coefficient of determination (R2) values indicated that the Kc performed ‘Good’ in estimating the seasonal evapotranspiration of maize. However, with respect to particular growth stages, the agreement between the calculated and measured values varied from ‘Satisfactory’ to ‘Very Good’. The Kc values for the initial, crop development, mid-season, and late stages were 0.40–0.60, 0.70–0.80, 1.1–1.21, and 0.50–0.65, respectively, while the values reported for maize by FAO are 0.3, 1.2, 0.3–0.6 for the initial, mid-season and late stage, respectively. The measured Kc values were different up to some extent from the FAO reported values; the cause might be that FAO Kc values are generalized ones and recommended for a wide range of climatic conditions. Other causes might be that different maize varieties have different crop water use and evapotranspiration patterns. So, determination of Kc for crops in different regions and climates is important to improve irrigation water management.
References:
ASCE-EWRI (2005): The ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation. Reston, Environmental and Water Resources Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers.
 
Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M. (1998): Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Rome, FAO.
 
Allen R.G (2000): Using the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient method over an irrigated region as part of an evapotranspiration intercomparison study. Journal of Hydrology, 229, 27-41  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00194-8
 
Baker J. T., Gitz D. C., Payton P., Wanjura D. F., Upchurch D. R. (2007): Using Leaf Gas Exchange to Quantify Drought in Cotton Irrigated Based on Canopy Temperature Measurements. Agronomy Journal, 99, 637-  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0062
 
Bodner G., Loiskandl W., Kaul H.-P. (2007): Cover crop evapotranspiration under semi-arid conditions using FAO dual crop coefficient method with water stress compensation. Agricultural Water Management, 93, 85-98  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.06.010
 
Bruce J.A. (1997): Does transpiration control stomata responses to water vapor pressure deficit? Plant Cell and Environment, 20: 136–141.
 
Çakir Recep (2004): Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research, 89, 1-16  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.005
 
Cornic G., Massassi A. (1996): Leaf photosynthesis under drought stress. In: Baker N.R. (ed.): Photosynthesis and the Environment. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
 
Hatfield J.L., Prueger J.H., Reicosky D.C. (1996): Evapotranspiration effects on water quality. In: Proc. ASAE Int. Conf. Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Scheduling, Nov 3–6, 1996, San Antonio: 536–546.
 
T. A. Howell , A. Yazar , A. D. Schneider , D. A. Dusek , K. S. Copeland (1995): Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Corn in Response to LEPA Irrigation. Transactions of the ASAE, 38, 1737-1747  https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.28001
 
Hsiao Theodore C., Heng Lee, Steduto Pasquale, Rojas-Lara Basilio, Raes Dirk, Fereres Elias (2009): AquaCrop—The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: III. Parameterization and Testing for Maize. Agronomy Journal, 101, 448-  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0218s
 
Jensen M.E., Burman R.D., Allen R.G. (1990): Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Water Requirements. Manual No. 70, Committee on Irrigation Water Requirements, Irrigation and Drainage Division of ASCE, New York, American Society of Civil Engineers.
 
Ko Jonghan, Piccinni Giovanni, Marek Thomas, Howell Terry (2009): Determination of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients (Kc) of cotton and wheat. Agricultural Water Management, 96, 1691-1697  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.06.023
 
Liu Yujie, Luo Yi (2010): A consolidated evaluation of the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient approach using the lysimeter data in the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management, 97, 31-40  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.07.003
 
Martínez-Cob A. (2008): Use of thermal units to estimate corn crop coefficients under semiarid climatic conditions. Irrigation Science, 26, 335-345  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-007-0097-5
 
D. N. Moriasi , J. G. Arnold , M. W. Van Liew , R. L. Bingner , R. D. Harmel , T. L. Veith (2007): Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50, 885-900  https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153
 
Morton F.I. (1983): Operational estimates of areal evapotranspiration and their significance to the science and practice of hydrology. Journal of Hydrology, 66, 1-76  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(83)90177-4
 
Pandey P., Pandey V. (2011): Lysimeter based crop coefficients for estimation of crop evapotranspiration of black gram (Vigna mungo L.) in sub-humid region. International Journal of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, 4: 50–58.
 
Peterson T. C., Golubev V. S., Groisman P. Ya. (1995): Evaporation losing its strength. Nature, 377, 687-688  https://doi.org/10.1038/377687b0
 
Smith M., Allen R., Monteith J.L. (1992): Expert Consultation on Revision of FAO Methodologies for Crop Water Requirements. Rome, FAO, Land and Water Development Division.
 
Thornthwaite C.W. (1944): Report of the Committee on Transpiration and Evaporation. Transaction of the American Geophysical Union, 25: 683–693.
 
Tyagi N.K, Sharma D.K, Luthra S.K (2000): Determination of evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of rice and sunflower with lysimeter. Agricultural Water Management, 45, 41-54  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00071-2
 
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences