An approach to mapping the potential of cultural agroecosystem servicesíková J., Kobza J., Pálka B., Mališ J., Kanianska R., Kizeková M. (2016): An approach to mapping the potential of cultural agroecosystem services. Soil & Water Res., 11: 44-52.
download PDF
A system for evaluating outdoor recreation as a cultural agroecosystem service is presented. Every agroecosystem presumably has the potential for providing some kind of outdoor recreation. Two approaches to mapping the recreation potential were used and compared – the Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) model and the regional model (RegMOD). From the possibilities of recreation activities, hiking, biking, and cross-country skiing were chosen. The comparison of the two approaches showed that the RegMOD incorporates a wider range of categories than the SolVES model, particularly for hiking. The robust character of the SolVES model is reflected by narrowing the spectrum of categories of this recreation activity. The differences in the map view are marked in the case of biking and cross-country skiing. Overall, the grasslands of the study area in Slovakia offer mainly medium relevant capacity (53.90% by the results of the SolVES, 64.90% by the results of the RegMOD) for providing selected outdoor recreation activities. The less productive (53.88% of all non-productive grasslands by the results of the SolVES, 48.00% by the results of the RegMOD) and non-productive grasslands represent a higher relevant capacity (41.18% of all non-productive grasslands by the results of the SolVES, 54.40% by the results of the RegMOD) for providing outdoor recreation activities. This brings about a new view of their management as well as use. The RegMOD developed in this paper is replicable and could be applied by managers mainly at the regional level on condition of their proficiency in geographical information systems.
Adamowicz W.L., Naidoo R., Nelson E., Polasky S., Zhang J. (2011): Nature-based tourism and recreation. In: Kareiva P., Daily G., Ricketts T., Tallis H., Polasky S. (eds): Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services. New York, Oxford University Press: 188–205.
Alessa Lilian (Naia), Kliskey Andrew (Anaru), Brown Gregory (2008): Social–ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social–ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, 27-39
Bagstad Kenneth J., Semmens Darius J., Waage Sissel, Winthrop Robert (2013): A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosystem Services, 5, 27-39
Bateman Ian J., Day Brett H., Jones Andrew P., Jude Simon (2009): Reducing gain–loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58, 106-118
Brown G. (2005): Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society and Naural Resources, 18: 1–23.
Brown Gregory (2006): Mapping landscape values and development preferences: a method for tourism and residential development planning. International Journal of Tourism Research, 8, 101-113
Burkhard B., Kroll F., Müller F.,Windhorst w. (2009): Landscapes capacities to provide ecosystem services – a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online, 15: 1–22.
Burkhard Benjamin, Kroll Franziska, Nedkov Stoyan, Müller Felix (2012): Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17-29
Burkhard Benjamin, Kandziora Marion, Hou Ying, Müller Felix (2014): Ecosystem Service Potentials, Flows and Demands – Concepts for Spatial Localisation, Indication and Quantification. Landscape Online, , 1-32
Chan Kai M.A., Satterfield Terre, Goldstein Joshua (2012): Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8-18
Crossman N.D.‚ Burkhard B.‚ Nedkov S.‚ Willemen L.‚ Petz K.‚ Palomo I.‚ Drakou E.G.‚ Martín-Lopez B.‚ Mc-Phearson T.‚ Boyanova K.‚ Alkemade R.‚ Egoh B.‚ Bunbar M.B., Maes J. (2013): A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services‚ 4: 4–14.
Costanza Robert, d'Arge Ralph, de Groot Rudolf, Farber Stephen, Grasso Monica, Hannon Bruce, Limburg Karin, Naeem Shahid, O'Neill Robert V., Paruelo Jose, Raskin Robert G., Sutton Paul, van den Belt Marjan (1997): The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260
Daniel T. C., Muhar A., Arnberger A., Aznar O., Boyd J. W., Chan K. M. A., Costanza R., Elmqvist T., Flint C. G., Gobster P. H., Gret-Regamey A., Lave R., Muhar S., Penker M., Ribe R. G., Schauppenlehner T., Sikor T., Soloviy I., Spierenburg M., Taczanowska K., Tam J., von der Dunk A. (): Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 8812-8819
de Groot Rudolf S, Wilson Matthew A, Boumans Roelof M.J (2002): A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393-408
Dominati Estelle, Patterson Murray, Mackay Alec (2010): A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecological Economics, 69, 1858-1868
Džatko M. (2002): Evaluation of Production Potential of Agricultural Soils and Soil-ecological Regions of Slovakia. Bratislava, VÚPOP. (in Slovak)
Felipe-Lucia María R., Comín Francisco A., Bennett Elena M. (2014): Interactions Among Ecosystem Services Across Land Uses in a Floodplain Agroecosystem. Ecology and Society, 19, -
Frélichová Jana, Vačkář David, Pártl Adam, Loučková Blanka, Harmáčková Zuzana V., Lorencová Eliška (2014): Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Ecosystem Services, 8, 110-117
Hauck Jennifer, Görg Christoph, Varjopuro Riku, Ratamäki Outi, Maes Joachim, Wittmer Heidi, Jax Kurt (2013): “Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making. Ecosystem Services, 4, 25-32
Kandziora M., Burkhard B., Müller F. (2013a): Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators − a theoretical matrix exercise. Ecological Indicators, 28: 54–78.
Kandziora M., Burkhard B., Müller F. (2013b): Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution. Ecosystem Services, 4: 47–59.
Kienast Felix, Bolliger Janine, Potschin Marion, de Groot Rudolf S., Verburg Peter H., Heller Iris, Wascher Dirk, Haines-Young Roy (2009): Assessing Landscape Functions with Broad-Scale Environmental Data: Insights Gained from a Prototype Development for Europe. Environmental Management, 44, 1099-1120
Lavorel Sandra, Grigulis Karl, Lamarque Pénélope, Colace Marie-Pascale, Garden Denys, Girel Jacky, Pellet Gilles, Douzet Rolland (2011): Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology, 99, 135-147
Maes J., Paracchini M.L., Zulian G. (2011): A European Assessment of the Provision of Ecosystem Services. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
Maes J., Hauck, J., Paracchini M.L., Ratamaki O., Termansen M., Perez-Soba M., Kopperoinen L., Rankinen K., Schagner J.P., Henrys P., Cisowska I., Zandersen M., Jax K., La Notte A., Leikola N., Pouta E., Smart S., Hasler B., Lankia T., Andersen H.E., Lavalle C., Vermaas T., Hussen Alemu M., Scholefeld P., Batista F., Pywell R., Hutchins M., Blemmer M., Fonnesbech-Wulff A., Vanbergen A.J., Munier B., Baranzelli C., Roy D., Thieu V., Zulian G., Kuussaari M., Thodsen H., Alanen E.-L., Egoh B., Sorensen P.B., Braat L., Bidoglio G. (2012): A Spatial Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Europe: Methods, Case Studies, and Policy Analysis – Phase 2, Synthesis Report. PEER Report No. 4, Ispra, Partnership for European Environmental Research.
MEA (2005): Millenium ecosystem assessment. In: Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Washington, D.C., World Resources Institute.
Milcu Andra Ioana, Hanspach Jan, Abson David, Fischer Joern (2013): Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research. Ecology and Society, 18, -
Naidoo R., Balmford A., Costanza R., Fisher B., Green R. E., Lehner B., Malcolm T. R., Ricketts T. H. (): Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 9495-9500
Naidoo Robin, Stuart-Hill Greg, Weaver L. Chris, Tagg Jo, Davis Anna, Davidson Andee (2011): Effect of Diversity of Large Wildlife Species on Financial Benefits to Local Communities in Northwest Namibia. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48, 321-335
Nieto-Romero Marta, Oteros-Rozas Elisa, González José A., Martín-López Berta (2014): Exploring the knowledge landscape of ecosystem services assessments in Mediterranean agroecosystems: Insights for future research. Environmental Science & Policy, 37, 121-133
Nelson Erik, Mendoza Guillermo, Regetz James, Polasky Stephen, Tallis Heather, Cameron DRichard, Chan Kai MA, Daily Gretchen C, Goldstein Joshua, Kareiva Peter M, Lonsdorf Eric, Naidoo Robin, Ricketts Taylor H, Shaw MRebecca (2009): Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 4-11
REED PATRICK, BROWN GREGORY (2003): Values Suitability Analysis: A Methodology for Identifying and Integrating Public Perceptions of Ecosystem Values in Forest Planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46, 643-658
Schulp C.J.E., Alkemade R., Goldewijk K.K., Petz K. (2012): Mapping ecosystem functions and services in Eastern Europe using global-scale data sets. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8: 156–168.
Scolozzi Rocco, Morri Elisa, Santolini Riccardo (2012): Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem service values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 21, 134-144
Sherrouse B.C., Semmens D.J. (2012): Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES). Documentation and User Manual, Version 2.0: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012–1023, U.S Department of the Interior, U.S. Geologocal Survey.
Sherrouse Benson C., Clement Jessica M., Semmens Darius J. (2011): A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography, 31, 748-760
Vačkár D., Frélochová J., Lorencová E., Pártl A., Harmáčková Z., Loučková B. (2013): Methodological Framework for Integrated Assessment of Ecosystem Services in the Czech Republic. Prague, The Czech Academy of Sciences. (in Czech)
van Riper Carena J., Kyle Gerard T., Sutton Stephen G., Barnes Melinda, Sherrouse Benson C. (2012): Mapping outdoor recreationists' perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia. Applied Geography, 35, 164-173
de Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. (2010): Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7, 260-272
Willemen Louise, Verburg Peter H., Hein Lars, van Mensvoort Martinus E.F. (2008): Spatial characterization of landscape functions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 88, 34-43
download PDF

© 2022 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti