Estimation of the external quality characteristics of goose eggs of known breadth and length

Karabulut O (2021): Estimation of the external quality characteristics of goose eggs of known breadth and length. Vet Med-Czech 66, 440–447.

download PDF

In this study, we investigated whether the mathematical formulas, which generally reveal the external quality characteristics of living organisms, yield the correct results in goose eggs. For this purpose, three genotypes and 555 eggs were studied that were grouped into Native (n = 356), Chinese (n = 163) and Linda (n = 36), which were raised in Aksaray province. The averages in the Native, Chinese and Linda geese were 5.43, 5.38 and 5.7 cm, respectively, in breadth; were 8.12, 8.03 and 8.67 cm in length, respectively; the shape index was 66.9, 67.2 and 66.7 cm, respectively; the egg volume was 142.8, 138.8 and 172.5 cm3, respectively; the egg surface area was 136.9, 134.3 and 155.4 cm2, respectively; the egg weight was 159.1, 154.5 and 192.3 g, respectively; the specific gravity of the eggs was 1.11, 1.11 and 1.12 g/cm3, respectively; the shell thickness was 0.510, 0.504 and 0.555 mm, respectively; the shell weight was 14.79, 14.32 and 18.26 g, respectively; the shell volume was 70.06, 67.82 and 86.41 cm3, respectively; the shell specific gravity was 2.111 3, 2.111 0 and 2.113 5 g/cm3, respectively; and the shell ratio was 9.29, 9.26 and 9.49 g, respectively. The number of pores is calculated as 14 828, 14 502 and 17 152, respectively. Although the formulas used give compatible results, there is a need for formulas that calculate closer to the truth rather than formulas that calculate the egg weight and egg shell weight.

Ahmad I, Alam MDJ, Haque MDS, Mamdud MAA. Proximate analysis and assessment the physical characteristics of different types of duck eggs in Bangladesh. J Eng Sci Res. 2017;1(2):38-42.
Alasahan S, Garip M, Caglayan T, Ates C. [Examination of some external quality traits of goose, duck and turkey eggs in public farms]. Harran Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2019 May 27;8(1):21-5. Turkish.
Arroyo CL. Gravedad especifica, peso y composicion porcentual de cascaron, clara y yema en huevos de gansa [Specific gravity, weight and the percentage of shell, white and yolk in goose eggs]. Agron Costarric. 1990;14(1):99-102. Spanish.
Bain MM. Egg shell strength: A relationship between the mechanism of failure and ultra structure organization of the mammillary layer. Br Poult Sci. 1992;33(2):303-19.
Balkan M, Biricik M. [Regional differences in shell thickness, pore number and pore density of eggs of Peking Duck (Anas Platyrhynchos f. Dom.). SDU J Nat Appl Sci. 2006;10(2):193-6. Turkish.
Biesiada-Drzazga B, Banaszewska D, Charuta A, Koncerewicz A. Influence of age on egg characteristics and reproduction features of Koluda® White geese. Europ Poult Sci. 2016 Mar 4;80: [13].
Carey C. Adaptation of the avian egg to high altitude. American Zoologist. 1980;20(2):449-59.
Carey C, Leon-Velarde F, Monge C. Eggshell conductance and other physical characteristics of avian eggs laid in the Peruvian Andes. Condor. 1990 Aug;92(3):790-3.
Copur-Akpinar G, Alasahan S, Canogullari-Dogan S. [Determination of the egg quality characteristics with mathematical formulas in Pekin Ducks grown in public farms]. TURJAF. 2017;5(12):1470-5. Turkish.
Decoratex. Breed of geese Linda: Description, content, breeding [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 5]. Available from:
Erensayin C. [Scientific-technical-practical poultry 3]. In: Erensayin C, editor. [Broiler breeding and hatchability]. Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing; 2000. p. 292-4. Turkish.
Kumbar V, Nedomova S, Trnka J, Buchar J, Pytel R. Effect of storage duration on the rheological properties of goose liquid egg products and eggshell membranes. Poult Sci. 2016 Jul 1;95(7):1693-701.
Mohsenin NN. Physical properties of plant and animal material: Physical characteristics and mechanical properties. New York: Gordon and Breach; 1970. p. 281-402.
Mulder J, Wollan O. How to choose fertilized chicken eggs [Internet]. Mother Earth News. 1974 [cited 2020 Aug 14]. Available from:
Narushin VG. Egg geometry calculation using the measurements of length and breadth. Poult Sci. 2005 Mar;84(3):482-4.
Nedomova S, Buchar J. Goose eggshell geometry. Res Agr Eng. 2014;60(3):100-6.
Nishiyama Y. The mathematics of egg shape. Int J Pure Appl Math. 2012;78(5):679-89.
Onk K, Kirmizibayrak T. [The egg production, hatchability, growing, slaughter and carcass characteristics of geese (Anser Anser) reared under breeders conditions in Kars Province; I. Egg production and hatchability characteristics]. TURJAF. 2019;7(3):543-9. Turkish.
Paganelli CV, Olszowka A, Ar A. The avian egg: Surface area, volume, and density. Condor. 1974;76(3):319-25.
Petrovic M, Obradovic M, Mijailovic R. Suitability analysis of Hugelschaffers egg curve application in architectural and structures geometry. In: Proceedings of ICEGD Conference, Iasi Romania, Buletinul Institutului Politehnic din Iasi, Publicat de Universitatea Tehnica “Gheorghe Asachi“ din Iasi, Tomul LVII (LXI), Fasc. 2011. p. 115-22.
Portugal SJ, Maurer G, Thomas GH, Hauber ME, Grim T, Cassey P. Nesting behaviour influences species-specific gas exchange across avian eggshells. J Exp Biol. 2014 Sep 15;217(Pt 18):3326-32.
Rabsztyn A, Andres K, Dudek M. Variability, heritability and correlations of egg shape in the Zatorska goose. J Cent Eur Agric. 2010;11(4):433-6.
Rahn H, Paganelli CV. Shell mass, thickness and density of avian eggs derived from the tables of Schonwetter. J Ornithol. 1989;130(1):59-68.
Saatci M, Yardimci M, Kaya I, Poyraz O. [Some egg properties of geese in Kars City]. Lalahan Hay Arast Enst Derg. 2002;42(2):37-45. Turkish.
Saatci M, Kirmizibayrak T, Aksoy AR, Tilki M. [Egg weight, shape index and hatching weight and interrelationships among these traits in Native Turkish geese with different coloured feathers]. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 2005;29(2):353-8. Turkish.
Sari M, Bugdayci KE, Akbas AA, Saatci M, Oguz MN. The effect of laying period on egg quality traits and chemical composition of Lindovskaya (Linda) geese reared under breeder conditions. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 2019 Sep;43(5):662-9.
Schonwetter M. Handbuch der Oologie [Handbook of oology]. Berlin: Akademie Verlag; 1960. 64 p. German.
Sreten M, Milena M, Mirjana DS. Phenotype correlation of external and incubation traits of Italian white goose eggs and goslings after hatching. Indian J Anim Res. 2018;52(4):497-501.
Tilki M, Inal S. Quality traits of goose eggs. 1. Effects of goose age and storage time of eggs. Arch Für Geflugelk. 2004a;68(4):182-6.
Tilki M, Inal S. Quality traits of goose eggs. 2. Effects of goose origin and storage time of eggs. Arch Für Geflugelk. 2004b;68(5):230-4.
Veldsman LM, Kylin H, Bronkhorst P, Engelbrecht I, Bouwman H. A method to determine the combined effects of climate change (temperature and humidity) and eggshell thickness on water loss from bird eggs. Environ Geochem Health. 2020 Mar;42(3):781-93.
Yamak US, Sarica M, Boz MA, Ucar A. The effect of eggshell thickness on hatching traits of partridges. Braz Poult Sci. 2016;18:13-8.
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti