Feasibility of dental panoramic radiography for dental arch evaluation in small animals
Y. Choi, E. Jeong, H. Oh, K. Kim, Y. Jung, J. Jeong, Y. Cho, K. Leehttps://doi.org/10.17221/18/2016-VETMEDCitation:Choi Y., Jeong E., Oh H., Kim K., Jung Y., Jeong J., Cho Y., Lee K. (2017): Feasibility of dental panoramic radiography for dental arch evaluation in small animals. Veterinarni Medicina, 62: 29-34.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of dental panoramic radiography for dental arch evaluation in small animals. The dental arches of four Beagles, one Shih Tzu dog, and three Korean short-haired cats were radiographed using human panoramic X-rays. All animals were under general anaesthesia during the examination. The animals’ heads were placed horizontal to the panoramic device, just as a human’s head is placed in panoramic dental assessments. All animals were evaluated with an open and closed mouth view (human view). In the closed mouth view, the animal was provided a bite blocker for proper placement of the oral cavity. The open mouth view angle was approximately 30–45°. The maxilla and mandible were held in position with radiolucent 3M tape. The standard scoring measurement was performed based on visibility of the tooth root and the sharpness of the dento-alveolar margin. No significant differences in scoring were noticed between the two positions. The visibility of teeth roots in Beagles was far better than that in the Shih Tzu dogs and two Korean short-haired cats. In addition, the Beagle series showed sharp dento-alveolar margin scores. These results suggest that human panoramic dental X-rays represent a possible dental evaluation tool for animals with large skulls.Keywords:
dog; panoramic X-ray; dental radiograph; large skullReferences:
Angelopoulos Christos, Bedard Aurelija, Katz Jerald O., Karamanis Stelios, Parissis Nikos (2004): Digital panoramic radiography: An overview. Seminars in Orthodontics, 10, 194-203 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2004.05.003Barrett Anthony P., Waters Bruce E., Griffiths Christopher J. (1984): A critical evaluation of panoramic radiography as a screening procedure in dental practice. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 57, 673-677 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(84)90292-5Debowes LJ, Dupont GA (2009): Mandibular molar teeth. In: Debowes LJ, Dupont GA (eds): Atlas of Dental Radiography in Dogs and Cats. Elsevier Inc., St Louis. 55–61.Esmans Maya C., Soukup Jason W., Schwarz Tobias (2014): OPTIMIZED CANINE DENTAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC PROTOCOL IN MEDIUM-SIZED MESATICEPAHLIC DOGS. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, , n/a-n/a https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12158Evans HE, Miller ME (2013): Skull. In: Miller ME (ed.): Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog. 4th edn. Elsevier Inc., St Louis. 84–88.Farman AG (2007): Image projection geometry. In: Farman AG (ed.): Panoramic Radiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. 1–3.FISHBERG MAURICE (1902): PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY OF THE JEWS. I.-THE CEPHALIC INDEX. American Anthropologist, 4, 684-706 https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1902.4.4.02a00030Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL (2003): Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 32, 229-234 https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/26310390Masunaga Morio, Ueda Hiroshi, Shibaguchi Tatsuya, Tanne Kazuo (2016): Change in the mesiodistal axial inclination of the maxillary lateral teeth during the mixed dentition stage: Morphometric analysis of panoramic radiographs from two cases of mild crowding with a high canine. APOS Trends in Orthodontics, 6, 24- https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-1407.173721Molander B (1996): Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics. Swedish Dental Journal 119, 1–26.Momin Mohammad A., Okochi Kiyoshi, Watanabe Hiroshi, Imaizumi Akiko, Omura Ken, Amagasa Teruo, Okada Norihiko, Ohbayashi Naoto, Kurabayashi Tohru (2009): Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam CT in the assessment of mandibular invasion of lower gingival carcinoma: Comparison with conventional panoramic radiography. European Journal of Radiology, 72, 75-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.018Nah K (2008): The ability of panoramic radiography in assessing maxillary sinus inflammatory diseases. Korean Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 38, 209–213.Park Kyoungsun, Ahn Jaesang, Kang Sunmee, Lee Euiri, Kim Soohyun, Park Sangwan, Park Sungwon, Noh Hyunwoo, Seo Kangmoon (2014): Determining the age of cats by pulp cavity/tooth width ratio using dental radiography. Journal of Veterinary Science, 15, 557- https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2014.15.4.557Perrone JR (2013): Anatomy of the dental radiograph. In: Perrone JR (ed.): Small Animal Dental Procedures for Veterinary Technicians and Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell, Ames. 101–103.Roza Marcello R., Silva Luiz Antonio F., Barriviera Mauricio, Januário Alessandro L., Bezerra Ana Cristina B., Fioravanti Maria Clorinda S. (2011): Cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography for diagnosis of dental abnormalities in dogs and cats. Journal of Veterinary Science, 12, 387- https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2011.12.4.387Rushton V.E., Horner K. (1996): The use of panoramic radiology in dental practice. Journal of Dentistry, 24, 185-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00055-0Rushton V.E, Horner K, Worthington H.V (1999): Factors influencing the selection of panoramic radiography in general dental practice. Journal of Dentistry, 27, 565-571 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00031-7Rushton V.E., Horner K., Worthington H.V. (2002): Routine panoramic radiography of new adult patients in general dental practice: Relevance of diagnostic yield to treatment and identification of radiographic selection criteria. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 93, 488-495 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.121994Scarfe WC, Farman AG (2008): What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dental Clinics of North America 52, 707–730.