Evaluation of the efficiency of the C-ring aiming guide for atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation in toy breed dogs

https://doi.org/10.17221/18/2018-VETMEDCitation:Park J.Y., Kim Y.R., Choi H.J., Lee Y.W., Jeong S.M., Lee H.B. (2019): Evaluation of the efficiency of the C-ring aiming guide for atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation in toy breed dogs. Veterinarni Medicina, 64: 18-24.
download PDF

The goal of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency and safety of the C-ring aiming guide for the atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique in toy breed dogs. Twenty-one adult canine cadavers of toy breed dogs were used in this study. The left and right sides of the cervical vertebrae were randomly assigned to two implant insertion groups: a C-ring aiming guide group and a drill guide group. A 1.2-mm Kirschner wire was inserted into each side by using either a C-ring aiming guide or a drill guide. CT scans were performed before and after surgery. The optimal safe implantation corridor angle and length, the implant insertion angle and length, the implant insertion time and the proportion of the insertion corridor to the optimal corridor were evaluated. Violations to the alar foramen and the vertebral canal also were evaluated. The implant insertion time was twice as long as that observed in the aiming guide group (< 0.05). The proportion of the insertion angle and length to the optimal angle were not significantly different between groups (P > 0.05). With respect to precision, there was a trend toward less variability in the aiming guide group; however, this difference was not significant (P = 0.09). The violation of the alar foramen was significantly lower in the aiming guide group than in the drill guide group (< 0.05). Violation to the vertebral canal was detected in one cadaver in the drill guide group but did not occur in the aiming guide group. The use of a C-ring aiming guide was associated with less damage to the alar foramen and the vertebral canal during atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation in toy breed dogs.

References:
Aikawa Takeshi, Shibata Mitsuhiro, Fujita Hiroshi (2013): Modified Ventral Stabilization Using Positively Threaded Profile Pins and Polymethylmethacrylate for Atlantoaxial Instability in 49 Dogs. Veterinary Surgery, 42, 683-692 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12016.x
 
Beaver Daniel P., Ellison Gary W., Lewis Daniel D., Goring Robert L., Kubilis Paul S., Barchard Curt (2000): Risk factors affecting the outcome of surgery for atlantoaxial subluxation in dogs: 46 cases (1978-1998). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 216, 1104-1109 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2000.216.1104
 
Hettlich Bianca F., Allen Matthew J., Pascetta Daniel, Fosgate Geoffrey T., Litsky Alan S. (2013): Biomechanical Comparison Between Bicortical Pin and Monocortical Screw/Polymethylmethacrylate Constructs in the Cadaveric Canine Cervical Vertebral Column. Veterinary Surgery, 42, 693-700 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12040.x
 
Jeserevics J., enk P., Beranek J., Jaggy A., Touru S., Cizinauskas S. (2008): Stabilisation of atlantoaxial subluxation in the dog through ventral arthrodesis. Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde, 150, 69-76 https://doi.org/10.1024/0036-7281.150.2.69
 
Kazan Saim, Yildirim Fato?, Sindel Muzaffer, Tuncer Recai? (2000): Anatomical evaluation of the groove for the vertebral artery in the axis vertebrae for atlanto-axial transarticular screw fixation technique. Clinical Anatomy, 13, 237-243 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2353(2000)13:4<237::AID-CA2>3.0.CO;2-K
 
Kieves Nina R., Lotsikas Peter J., Schulz Kurt S., Canapp Sherman O. (2014): Hip Toggle Stabilization Using the TightRope® System in 17 Dogs: Technique and Long-Term Outcome. Veterinary Surgery, 43, 515-522 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12158.x
 
Leblond Guillaume, Gaitero Luis, Moens Noel M., zur Linden Alex, James Fiona M. K., Monteith Gabrielle, Runciman John (2016): Canine atlantoaxial optimal safe implantation corridors – description and validation of a novel 3D presurgical planning method using OsiriX™. BMC Veterinary Research, 12, - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0824-3
 
Platt Simon R., Chambers Jonathon N., Cross Alan (2004): A Modified Ventral Fixation for Surgical Management of Atlantoaxial Subluxation in 19 Dogs. Veterinary Surgery, 33, 349-354 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04050.x
 
Plessas IN, Volk HA (2014): Signalment, clinical signs and treatment of atlantoaxial subluxation in dogs: a systematic review of 336 published cases from 1967 to 2013. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 28, 948.
 
THOMAS WILLIAM B., SORJONEN DONALD C., SIMPSON STEPHEN T. (1991): Surgical Management of Atlantoaxial Subluxation in 23 Dogs. Veterinary Surgery, 20, 409-412 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.1991.tb00348.x
 
Vizcaino Reves N, Stahl C, Stoffel M, Bali M, Forterre F (2013): CT scan based determination of optimal bone corridor for atlantoaxial ventral screw fixation in miniature breed dogs. Veterinary Surgery 42, 819–824.
 
Warren-Smith CMR, Kneissl S, Benigni L, Kenny RJ, Lamb CR (2009): Incomplete ossification of the atlas in dogs with cervical signs. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 50, 635–638.
 
download PDF

© 2019 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences