Comparison of three ECG machines for electrocardiography in green iguanas (Iguana iguana)

https://doi.org/10.17221/39/2020-VETMEDCitation:

Cermakova E, Piskovska A, Trhonova V, Schilliger L, Knotek Z (2021): Comparison of three ECG machines for eletrocardiography in green iguanas (Iguana iguana). Vet Med-Czech 66, 66–71.

download PDF

The aim of the study was to compare the heart rate, QRS interval, and R wave amplitude across three electrocardiogram models, and assess the ability of each of them to provide electrocardiograms (ECG) for clinical interpretation. The three electrocardiogram models included ECG Seiva Praktik Veterinary, CardioStore ECG and AliveCor Veterinary Heart Monitor. The data were collected from twelve healthy adult captive green iguanas (Iguana iguana) monitored under a manual restraint at a room temperature of 22.6–28.0 °C. The ECGs using the Seiva Praktik and CardioStore ECG veterinary electrocardiography were performed with standard 4 lead ECG recordings. The AliveCor Veterinary Heart Monitor was placed (with the use of gel) directly on the lateral body wall. The mean heart rate was 42 ± 8 beats/min (CardioStore), 50 ± 11 beats/min (Seiva Praktik Veterinary), and 51 ± 9 beats/min (AliveCor Veterinary Heart Monitor). No significant difference in the heart rate was observed. A significant difference (P < 0.05) in the QRS duration was observed between the CardioStore and AliveCor Veterinary Heart Monitor. Significant differences (P < 0.01) in the R wave amplitude were detected between the CardioStore and AliveCor Veterinary Heart Monitor and between the Seiva Praktik Veterinary and AliveCor Veterinary Heart Monitor. The ECGs produced by the Seiva Praktik VVeeterinary and CardioStore machines were interpretable at 100%, while those produced by the AliveCor Veterinary Heart Monitor were interpretable at 66%. Seiva Praktik Veterinary is most appropriately used as an anaesthesia monitoring tool. AliveCor Veterinary Heart Monitor could be used as an additional diagnostic tool, but the results should be ideally confirmed with a standard ECG machine. Seiva Praktik Veterinary is the most appropriate tool for monitoring the ECG within the anaesthesia, while CardioStore might be most appropriately used as an advanced diagnostic tool by virtue of its software assistance. The ECGs obtained with AliveCor Veterinary Heart Monitor should be confirmed using a standard ECG machine.

References:
Bado O, Dlouha M, Kolmanova E, Frydrych M. Influence of new ultra-short-acting β-blockers on selected physiological indicators in laboratory rats. Vet Med-Czech. 2017 Sep;62(9):493-507. https://doi.org/10.17221/65/2017-VETMED
 
Bogan JE. Ophidian cardiology – A review. J Herpetol Med Surg. 2017;27(1-2):62-77. https://doi.org/10.5818/1529-9651-27.1-2.62
 
Boukens BJD, Kristensen DL, Filogonio R, Carreira LBT, Sartori MR, Abe AS, Currie S, Joyce W, Conner J, Opthof T, Crossley DA 2nd, Wang T, Jensen B. The electrocardiogram of vertebrates: Evolutionary changes from ectothermy to endothermy. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2019 Jul;144:16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.08.005
 
Dahhan M. Elektrokardiographische Untersuchungen beim Grunen Leguan (Iguana iguana) [Electrocardiographic parameters in the green iguana (Iguana iguana)] [dissertation]. München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität; 2006. 101 p. German.
 
Davies F, Francis ETB, King TS. Electrocardiogram of the crocodilian heart. Nature. 1951 Jan 27;167(4239):146. https://doi.org/10.1038/167146a0
 
Germer CM, Tomaz JM, Carvalho AF, Bassani RA, Bassani JWM. Electrocardiogram, heart movement and heart rate in the awake gecko (Hemidactylus mabouia). J Comp Physiol. 2015 Jan;185(1):111-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-014-0873-5
 
Haberman ZC, Jahn RT, Bose R, Tun H, Shinbane JS, Doshi RN, Chang PM, Saxon LA. Wireless smartphone ECG enables large-scale screening in diverse populations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 May;26(5):520-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12634
 
Heaton-Jones T, King R. Characterization of the electrocardiogram of the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). J Zoo Wildl Med. 1994;25(1):40-7.
 
Holz RM, Holz P. Electrocardiography in anesthetized red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans). Res Vet Sci. 1995 Jan;58(1):67-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-5288(95)90091-8
 
Hunt CJ. Electrocardiography of the normal inland bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) [thesis]. [United Kingdom]: Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons; 2013. 43 p.
 
Chung EH, Guise KD. QTC intervals can be assessed with the AliveCor heart monitor in patients on dofetilide for atrial fibrillation. J Electrocardiol. 2015 Jan-Feb;48(1):8-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.10.005
 
Jacob JS, McDonald HS. Temperature preferences and electrocardiography of Elaphe obsoleta (Serpentes). Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Physiol. 1975 Dec 1;52(4):591-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9629(75)80005-3
 
Liu CH, Li R. Electrocardiogram and heart rate in response to temperature acclimation in three representative vertebrates. Comp Biochem Physiol. 2005 Dec;142(4):416-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.09.008
 
McDonald HS, Heath JE. Electrocardiographic observation on the tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus. Comp biochem Physiol. 1971 Dec;40(4):881-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(71)90277-5
 
Mitchell M. Reptile cardiology. Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2009 Jan;12(1):65-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2008.10.001
 
Mullen RK. Comparative electrocardiography of the Squamata. Physiol Zool. 1967;40(2):114-26. https://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.40.2.30152446
 
Schilliger L, Girling S. Cardiology. In: Divers S, Stahl SJ, editors. Mader’s reptile and amphibian medicine and surgery. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2019. p. 669-98.
 
Schilliger L, Chai N, Chetboul V, Bonwitt J. Smartphone-based ECG monitor: Feasibility and applications in herpetological medicine [abstract]. In: Proceedings Association of Reptilian and Amphibian Veterinarians; 2014 Oct 18–24; Orlando, Florida. Orlando, FL,USA: Arav; 2014. p. 129-30.
 
Schumacher J, Mans CH. Anesthesia. In: Divers SJ, Mader DR, editors. Current therapy in reptile medicine and surgery. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2014. p. 134-53.
 
Smith J, Ward J, Urbano T, Mueller M. Use of AliveCor heart monitor for heart rate and rhythm evaluation in dairy water buffalo calves (Bubalis Bubalis). J Dai Vet Anim Res. 2016;4(2):261-4. https://doi.org/10.15406/jdvar.2016.04.00113
 
Valentinuzzi ME, Hoff HE, Geddes LA. Electrocardiogram of the snake: Intervals and durations. J Electrocardiol. 1969;2(4):343-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0736(69)80004-X
 
Valentinuzzi ME, Hoff HE, Geddes LA. Electrocardiogram of the snake: Effect of vagal stimulation on the Q-T duration. J Electrocardiol. 1970;3(1):21-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0736(70)80068-1
 
Vandenberk T, Stans J, Mortelmans C, Van Haelst R, Van Schelvergem G, Pelckmans C, Smeets CJ, Lanssens D, De Canniere H, Storms V, Thijs IM, Vaes B, Vandervoort PM. Clinical validation of heart rate apps: Mixed-methods evaluation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Aug 25;5(8): [15]. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7254
 
Vezzosi T, Buralli C, Marchesotti F, Porporato F, Tognetti R, Zini E, Domenech O. Diagnostic accuracy of a smartphone electrocardiography in dogs: Comparison with standard 6-lead electrocardiography. Vet J. 2016 Oct;216:33-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.06.013
 
Zemanova A, Sochorcova V, Knotek Z. Zakladni metody kardiologickeho vysetreni plazu [Basic methods of cardiological examination in reptiles]. Veterinarni klinika. 2016;13:20-7. Czech.
 
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti