Use of an automatic needle-free injection device for foot-and-mouth disease vaccination in dairy heifers

Wataradee S, Boonserm T, Srangaprakon C, Ajariyakhajorn K, Inchaisri C (2021): Use of an automatic needle-free injection device for foot-and-mouth disease vaccination in dairy heifers. Vet Med-Czech 66, 87–93.

download PDF

The foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccination of Thai dairy cows is routinely conducted to control and prevent the disease. In Thailand, FMD control strategies include a subcutaneous route (s.c.) vaccination with 2 ml of inactivated FMD vaccine 2–3 times a year produced by the Department of Livestock Development (DLD). A new way of vaccination was introduced in the form of an automatic needle-free injection device. This technology has several important advantages, such as requiring less animal restraint, reduced time and labour with high precision, and a consistent delivery system. Here, the effectiveness of an automatic needle-free injection (ANFI) device was evaluated in 30 dairy heifers (randomly divided into three groups, 10 in each group) in the FMD vaccine delivery. The first group was subcutaneously (s.c.) vaccinated using a conventional hypodermic needle with 2 ml of the vaccine, the second group received the same, but using a CO2-powered ANFI device, and the third group received the vaccine using the same ANFI device, but administered intradermally (i.d.) with only 1 ml of the vaccine. The blood samples collected up to 120 days post-vaccination revealed that both injection methods resulted in a similar serological response. The results suggest that the i.d. and s.c. ANFI systems are effective and safe. Moreover, the i.d. use of the ANFI enabled the possibility to half the vaccination dose with the same efficacy. Therefore, the ANFI can be used as an alternative approach for FMD vaccination by s.c. or i.d. routes in dairy cows in Thailand. Ultimately, reducing the use of restraint devices and labour will improve the vaccination for the prevention and control of FMD and may improve the cows’ welfare.

Bennett CR, Mundell RD, Monheim LM. Studies on tissue penetration characteristics produced by jet injection. J Am Dent Assoc. 1971 Sep;83(3):625-9.
Chen K, Pan M, Liu T. Design and analysis of a continuous split typed needle-free injection system for animal vaccination. J Biomed Eng. 2017 Jun 30;11:59-71.
Doel TR. Natural and vaccine-induced immunity to foot and mouth disease: The prospects for improved vaccines. Rev Sci Tech. 1996 Sep;15(3):883-911.
Elnekave E, Dekker A, Eble P, van Hemert-Kluitenberg F, Gelman B, Storm N, Klement E. The serological response against foot and mouth disease virus elicited by repeated vaccination of dairy cattle. Vaccine. 2016 Sep 22;34(41):4920-6.
Erskine RJ, Bartlett PC, Byrem TM, Render CL, Febvay C, Houseman JT. Association between bovine leukemia virus, production, and population age in Michigan dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 2012 Feb;95(2):727-34.
Ferrari G, Paton D, Duffy S, Bartels C, Knight-Jones T, Metwally S, Munstermann S. Monitoring the impact of vaccination and other control measures. In: Metwally S, Munstermann S, editors. Foot and mouth disease vaccination and post-vaccination monitoring guidelines. [Rome]: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; World Organisation for Animal Health; 2016. p. 39-45.
Giudice EL, Campbell JD. Needle-free vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006 May;58(1):68-89.
Hollis L, Smith J, Johnson B, Kapil S, Mosier D. A comparison of serological responses when modified-live infectious Bovine rhinotracheitis virus vaccine, Mannheimia haemolytica bacterin-toxoid, and leptospira pomona bacterin are administered with needle-free versus conventional needle-based injection in Holstein dairy calves. Bov Pract. 2005 Jun;39(2):110-4.
Hopkins SG, DiGiacomo RF. Natural transmission of bovine leukemia virus in dairy and beef cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1997 Mar;13(1):107-28.
Jithlang W, Sirimongkolrat C. Serological survey for foot and mouth disease of beef cattle in Thailand [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2020 Jan 16). Available from:
Kale TR, Momin M. Needle-free injection technology – An overview. Innov Pharm. 2014 Jan;5(1): [9].
Liard C, Munier S, Joulin-Giet A, Bonduelle O, Hadam S, Duffy D, Vogt A, Verrier B, Combadiere B. Intradermal immunization triggers epidermal Langerhans cell mobilization required for CD8 T-cell immune responses. J Invest Dermatol. 2012 Mar;132(3 Pt 1):615-25.
OIE – World Organisation for Animal Health. OIE Member countries’ official FMD status map [Internet]. 2017a [cited 2020 Jan 16]. Available from:
OIE – World Organisation for Animal Health. OIE terrestrial animals manual [Internet]. 2017b [cited 2020 Jan 16]. Available from:
Otake S, Dee SA, Rossow KD, Joo HS, Deen J, Molitor TW, Pijoan C. Transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by needles. Vet Rec. 2002 Jan 26;150(4):114-5.
Pandya M, Pacheco JM, Bishop E, Kenney M, Milward F, Doel T, Golde WT. An alternate delivery system improves vaccine performance against foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). Vaccine. 2012 Apr 26;30(20):3106-11.
Pires A, Hoar B, Olsen S, Sischo W. Serological response to administration of Brucella abortus RB 51 vaccine, using needle-free and standard needle-based injection system. Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Conference, American Association of Bovine Practitioners; 2007 Sep 20-22; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. American Association of Bovine Practitioners; 2007. p. 278.
Prakotcheo R, Premashthira S. Seroprevalence and risk factors of foot and mouth disease virus infection in cloven-hoofed animals in the eastern part of Thailand [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 Jan 16]. Available from:
Rao SS, Gomez P, Mascola JR, Dang V, Krivulka GR, Yu F, Lord CI, Shen L, Bailer R, Nabel GJ, Letvin NL. Comparative evaluation of three different intramuscular delivery methods for DNA immunization in a nonhuman primate animal model. Vaccine. 2006 Jan 16;24(3):367-73.
Reinbold JB, Coetzee JF, Hollis LC, Nickell JS, Riegel CM, Christopher JA, Ganta RR. Comparison of iatrogenic transmission of Anaplasma marginale in Holstein steers via needle and needle-free injection techniques. Am J Vet Res. 2010 Oct;71(10):1178-88.
Rey MR. On-farm evaluation of a needle-free injection device to vaccinate beef calves under Western Canadian conditions [master’s thesis]. [Manitoba]: University of Manitoba; 2013. 137 p.
Rey MR, Undi M, Rodriguez-Lecompte JC, Joseph T, Morrison J, Yitbarek A, Wittenberg K, Tremblay R, Crow GH, Ominski KH. A study of the effectiveness of a needle-free injection device compared with a needle and syringe used to vaccinate calves against bovine viral diarrhea and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis viruses. Vet J. 2013 Oct;198(1):235-8.
Rey M, Rodriguez-Lecompte J, Undi M, Joseph T, Morrison J, Yitbarek A, Wittenberg K, Tremblay R, Crow G, Ominski K. Efficacy of needle-free injection on antibody production against Clostridium chauvoei in beef calves under field conditions. Can Vet J. 2015 Apr;56(4):405-7.
Rodriguez LL, Grubman MJ. Foot and mouth disease virus vaccines. Vaccine. 2009 Nov;27(4):90-4.
Skilton D, Thompson J. Needlestick injuries. Vet Rec. 2005 Apr 16;156(16):522.
Suresh K, Chandrashekara S. Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2012 Jan;5(1):7-13.
van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk S. Rationale and perspectives on the success of vaccination against bovine herpesvirus-1. Vet Microbiol. 2006 Mar 31;113(3-4):275-82.
Weese JS, Jack DC. Needlestick injuries in veterinary medicine. Can Vet J. 2008 Aug;49(8):780-4.
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti