Polyspermic fertilisation of porcine oocytes in vitro – a current review

https://doi.org/10.17221/79/2019-VETMEDCitation:Chundekkad P., Stankiewicz T., Błaszczyk B., Udała J. (2019): Polyspermic fertilisation of porcine oocytes in vitro – a current review. Veterinarni Medicina, 64: 513-520.
download PDF

Polyspermic fertilisation has been a continual problem in porcine in vitro fertilisation. Over the years, researchers have tried to resolve this persistent problem, but have not been entirely successful in their endeavour. This can be attributed to several factors. This review discusses the role of sperm capacitation in the in vitro fertilisation and the most recent studies on the capacitation media. This includes the results obtained by testing the effect of various compounds on sperm capacitation. Additionally, the importance of the oviductal fluid on the porcine oocytes prior to fertilisation is also discussed. This is of significance, as the experiments show that oviductal fluid is crucial for the pre-fertilisation zona pellucida hardening. Also, the significance of using high quality oocytes for the in vitro fertilisation is highlighted. Lastly, the different and latest techniques to prevent or reduce polyspermic fertilisation have been reviewed.

References:
Aviles M, Gutierrez-Adan A, Coy P (2010): Oviductal secretions: will they be key factors for the future ARTs? Molecular Human Reproduction: Basic Science of Reproductive Medicine 16, 896–906.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gaq056
 
Ballester L, Romero-Aguirregomezcorta J, Soriano-Ubeda C, Matas C, Romar R, Coy P (2014): Timing of oviductal fluid collection, steroid concentrations, and sperm preservation method affect porcine in vitro fertilization efficiency. Fertility and Sterility 102, 1762–1768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.009
 
Barros C, Yanagimachi R (1971): Induction of zona reaction in golden hamster eggs by cortical granule material. Nature 233, 268–269.  https://doi.org/10.1038/233268a0
 
Batista RITP, Moro LN, Corbin E, Alminana C, Goncalves JM, Freitas VJF, Mermillod P (2016): Combination of oviduct fluid and heparin to improve monospermic zygotes production during porcine in vitro fertilization. Theriogenology 86, 495–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.01.031
 
Bedford JM (2004): Enigmas of mammalian gamete form and function. Biological Reviews 79, 429–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S146479310300633X
 
Brogni CF, Ohlweiler LU, Klein N, Mezzalira JC, Cristani J, Mezzalira A (2016): Pre-incubation of porcine semen reduces the incidence of polyspermy on embryos derived from low quality oocytes. Ciência Rural 46, 1113–1118.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150700
 
Buhi WC, Alvarez IM, Choi I, Cleaver BD, Simmen FA (1996): Molecular cloning and characterization of an estrogen-dependent porcine oviductal secretory glycoprotein. Biology of Reproduction 55, 1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod55.6.1305
 
Canovas S, Romar R, Grullon LA, Aviles M, Coy P (2009): Pre-fertilisation zona pellucida hardening by different cross linkers affects IVF in pigs and cattle and improves embryo production in pigs. Reproduction 137, 803–812. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-08-0340
 
Cheng WTK, Moor R, Polge CE (1986): In vitro fertilization of pig and sheep oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro. Theriogenology 25, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(86)90200-1
 
Coy P, Canovas S, Mondejar I, Saavedra MD, Romar R, Grullon L, Matas C, Aviles M (2008): Oviduct-specific glycoprotein and heparin modulate sperm–zona pellucida interaction during fertilization and contribute to the control of polyspermy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 15809–15814.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804422105
 
Coy P, Lloyd R, Romar R, Satake N, Matas C, Gadea J, Holt WV (2010): Effects of porcine pre-ovulatory oviductal fluid on boar sperm function. Theriogenology 74, 632–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.03.005
 
Flechon JE, Hunter RHF (1981): Distribution of spermatozoa in the utero-tubal junction and isthmus of pigs, and their relationship with the luminal epithelium after mating: A scanning electron microscope study. Tissue and Cell 13, 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-8166(81)90043-4
 
Fowler KE, Mandawala AA, Griffin DK, Walling GA, Harvey SC (2018): The production of pig preimplantation embryos in vitro: Current progress and future prospects. Reproductive Biology 18, 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbio.2018.07.001
 
Francipane MG, Lagasse E (2016): Toward organs on demand: Breakthroughs and challenges in models of organogenesis. Current Pathobiology Reports 4, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40139-016-0111-9
 
Funahashi H, Fujiwara T, Nagai T (2000): Modulation of the function of boar spermatozoa via adenosine and fertilization promoting peptide receptors reduce the incidence of polyspermic penetration into porcine oocytes. Biology of Reproduction 63, 1157–1163. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod63.4.1157
 
Gil MA, Cuello C, Parrilla I, Vazquez JM, Roca J, Martinez EA (2010): Advances in swine in vitro embryo production Technologies. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 45, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01623.x
 
Han Y, Biswas D, Yoon JD, Jeon Y, Hyun SH (2019): Effect of porcine uterus as ex vivo model of fertilizing ability and gene expression pattern on blastocysts. Theriogenology 129, 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.02.025
 
Hunter RH (1974): Chronological and cytological details of fertilization and early embryonic development in the domestic pig, Sus scrofa. The Anatomical Record 178, 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091780203
 
Kitaji H, Ookutsu S, Sato M, Miyoshi K (2015): A new rolling culture-based in vitro fertilization system capable of reducing polyspermy in porcine oocytes. Animal Science Journal 86, 494–498.  https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12327
 
Loki S, Wu Q, Takayama O, Motohashi HH, Wakai T, Funahashi H (2016): A phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor, sildenafil, induces sperm capacitation and penetration into porcine oocytes in a chemically defined medium. Theriogenology 85, 428–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.09.013
 
Martinez CA, Cambra J, Maside C, Cuello C, Roca J, Martinez E, Parrilla I, Gil M (2019): High pre-freezing sperm dilution improves monospermy without affecting the penetration rate in porcine IVF. Theriogenology 131, 162–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.04.001
 
Mondejar I, Martinez-Martinez I, Aviles M, Coy P (2013): Identification of potential oviductal factors responsible for zona pellucida hardening and monospermy during fertilization in mammals. Biology of Reproduction 89, 67. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.113.111385
 
Motta LCB, Chaves DF, Bhat MH (2018): In vitro embryo production in the pig. In: Bergstein-Galan TG (ed.): Reproduction Biotechnology in Farm Animals. AvidScience. 200–222 pp.
 
Nagashima H, Grupen C, Ashman JR, Nottle BM (1996): Developmental competence of in vivo and in vitro matured porcine oocyte after subzonal sperm injection. Molecular Reproduction and Development 45, 359–363.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199611)45:3<359::AID-MRD13>3.0.CO;2-U
 
Park CH, Lee SG, Choi DH, Lee CK (2009): A modified swim-up method reduces polyspermy during in vitro fertilization of porcine oocytes. Animal Reproduction Science 115, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.12.004
 
Romar R, Canovas S, Matas C, Gadea J, Coy P (2019): Pig in vitro fertilization: Where are we and where do we go? Therigenology 137, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.05.045
 
Romero-Aguirregomezcorta J, Matas C, Coy P (2015): α-L-fucosidase enhances capacitation-associated events in porcine spermatozoa. The Veterinary Journal 203, 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.11.006
 
Sano H, Matsuura K, Naruse K, Funahashi H (2009): Application of a microfluidic sperm sorter to the in-vitro fertilization of porcine oocytes reduced the incidence of polyspermic penetration. Theriogenology 74, 863–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.04.011
 
Soriano-Ubeda C, Garcia-Vazquez FA, Romero-Aguirregomezcorta J, Matas C (2017): Improving porcine in vitro fertilization output by simulating the oviductal environment. Scientific Reports 7, 43616. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43616
 
Soriano-Ubeda C, Romero-Aguirregomezcorta J, Matas C, Visconti PE, Garcia-Vazquez FA (2019): Manipulation of bicarbonate concentration in sperm capacitation media improves in vitro fertilisation output in porcine species. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 10, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0324-y
 
Tienthai P (2015): The porcine sperm reservoir in relation to the function of hyaluronan. Journal of Reproduction and Development 61, 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.2015-006
 
Tokuhiro K, Dean J (2018): Glycan-independent gamete recognition triggers egg zinc sparks and ZP2 cleavage to prevent polyspermy. Developmental Cell 46, 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2018.07.020
 
Umehara T, Kawai T, Goto M, Richards JS, Shimada M (2018): Creatine enhances the duration of sperm capacitation: a novel factor for improving in vitro fertilization with small numbers of sperm. Human Reproduction 33, 1117–1129. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey081
 
Wang W, Abeydeera LR, Prather SR, Day B (1998): Morphological comparison of ovulated and in vitro–matured porcine oocytes, with particular reference to polyspermy after in vitro fertilization. Molecular Reproduction and Development 49, 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199803)49:3<308::AID-MRD11>3.0.CO;2-S
 
Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Itoh S, Kikuchi K, Iwamura S, Rodriguez-Martinez H (2003): Production of piglets derived from in vitro-produced blastocysts fertilized and cultured in chemically defined media: Effects of theophylline, adenosine, and cysteine during in vitro fertilization. Biology of Reproduction 69, 2092–2099.  https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.020081
 
Zhang W, Yi K, Yan H, Zhou X (2012): Advances on in vitro production and cryopreservation of porcine embryos. Animal Reproduction Science 132, 115–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.05.008
 
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences