Pelvimetry in the Teramana goat breed: a comparison between radiography and ultrasound Amicis I., Stehlik L., Del Signore F., Parrillo S., Robbe D., Tamburro R., Vignoli M. (2019): Pelvimetry in the Teramana goat breed: a comparison between radiography and ultrasound. Veterinarni Medicina, 64: 476-481.
download PDF

Radiography is routinely used for pelvimetry, but it is not easily accessible for farm animals, while ultrasonographic pelvimetry could be used due to the better accessibility and lack of radiation hazard. Radiographic and ultrasonographic pelvimetry in goats were compared, and three diameters of the pelvis were measured; the narrowest transverse pelvic diameter at the level of the acetabula, from the pecten pubis to the sacral promontorium and from the dorsal edge of the pubis to the coccygeal vertebra. The measurement was performed three times by one observer on both modalities. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were performed. The intraobserver agreement was excellent for all the measurements and modalities in the study. Excellent agreement (ICC 0.96) was achieved for the transverse pelvic diameter. The agreement for the other two diameters was poor. We can conclude that the ultrasonographic pelvimetry of a goat is reliable only in the transverse pelvic diameter just cranial to the pecten pubis.

Bland JM, Altman DG (1986): Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327, 307–310.
Dobak TP, Voorhout G, Vernooij JCM, Boroffka SAEB (2018): Computed tomographic pelvimetry in English bulldogs. Theriogenology 118, 144–149.
Eneroth A, Linde-Forsberg C, Uhlhorn M, Hall M (1999): Radiographic pelvimetry for assessment of dystocia in bitches: A clinical study in two terrier breeds. Journal of Small Animal Practice 40, 257–264.
Farrow CS (1978): Maternal-fetal evaluation in suspected canine dystocia – radiographic prospective. Canadian Veterinary Journal 19, 24–26.
Haughey KG, Gray CH (1982): A radiographic technique for pelvimetry of un-anesthestized ewes and a comparison of 3 methods of estimating the area of the pelvic inlet. Australian Veterinary Journal 58, 51–59.
Houston CS (1977): Diagnostic irradiation of women during reproductive period. Canadian Medical Association Journal 117, 648–651.
Kene ROC (1991): Radiographic investigation of dystocia in the West African dwarf goat. British Veterinary Journal 147, 283–289.
Koo TK, Li MY (2016): A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 15, 155–163.
Monteiro CLB, Campos AIM, Madeira VLH, Silva HVR, Freire LMP, Pinto JN, De Souza LP, Da Silva LDM (2013): Pelvic differences between brachycephalic and mesaticephalic cats and indirect pelvimetry assessment. Veterinary Record 172, 16.
Nahkur E, Ernits E, Jalakas M, Jarv E (2011): Morphological characteristics of pelves of Estonian Holstein and Estonian native breed cows from the perspective of calving. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia 40, 379–388.
Ocal MK, Dabanoglu I, Kara ME, Turan E (2003): Computed tomographic pelvimetry in German Shepherd dogs. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 110, 17–20.
Pentea M, Ganta CV (2007): Establishing pelvimetric parameters by computer tomography in Rottweiler bitches. Lucrări Ştiinłifice Medicină Veterinară XL, 535–537.
Salk I, Cetin A, Salk S, Cetin M (2016): Pelvimetry by three-dimensional computed tomography in non-pregnant multiparous women who delivered vaginally. Polish Journal of Radiology 81, 219–227.
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979): Intraclass correlations – uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 86, 420–428.
download PDF

© 2020 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences