Associations between claw lesions and reproductive performance of sows in three Greek herds
Μ. Lisgara, V. Skardonis, E. Angelidou, S. Kouroupides, L. Leontideshttps://doi.org/10.17221/8416-VETMEDCitation:Lisgara Μ., Skardonis V., Angelidou E., Kouroupides S., Leontides L. (2015): Associations between claw lesions and reproductive performance of sows in three Greek herds. Veterinarni Medicina, 60: 415-422.
Claw lesions, which are nowadays very common in sows, are associated with a high risk of early culling and compromised welfare. In this study, we investigated the associations between the severity of claw lesions and three of the most important reproductive indicators, the number of live-born and weaned piglets and the wean-to-first service interval in three Greek farrow-to-finish herds. All studied sows were individually housed during their previous gestations. Sows were examined for lesions, which were scored on a severity scale, on several anatomical sites of the claws, before farrowing. Data on the examined reproductive indicators were retrieved from productivity databases of the herds. Because scoring of lesions on several claw sites resulted in many correlated variables for each sow examined, we employed factor analysis to create a smaller set of uncorrelated variables (factors) which contained all the information in the original variables and produced the corresponding factor scores. The number of live-born and weaned piglets was associated with the produced factor scores in two multivariable linear regression models, whereas the possible associations between the wean-to-first service interval and the factor scores was modelled with the use of zero-inflated negative binomial regression. The number of live-born piglets was negatively associated with factor scores representing lesions on heel (P ≤ 0.001) and sole of front feet (P = 0.019). The number of weaned piglets was also negatively associated with factor scores representing lesions on heel (P = 0.003) of any foot, on sole of front feet (P = 0.001) and on white line, sole and wall of rear feet (P = 0.008), while the wean-to-first service interval was associated with factor scores representing lesions on heel of any foot (P = 0.02), on sole of front feet (P = 0.02) and of dew claw length of front feet (P = 0.009). Our results indicate that combinations of lesions on the dorsal and ventral part of the claws, negatively affected the reproduction parameters considered, emphasising the importance of general improvement of feet health.Keywords:sows; claw lesions; reproductive performanceReferences:
Aherne FX, Foxcroft GR, Pettigrew JE (1999): Nutrition of the sow. In: Straw BE, D’Alaire S, Mengeling WL, Taylor DJ (eds.): Diseases of Swine. 8th ed. State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA. 1029–1043.Almond GW, Flowers WL, Batista L, D’Allaire S (2006): Diseases of the reproductive system. In: Straw BE, Zimmerman Jeffery J, D’Allaire S, Taylor David J (eds.): Diseases of Swine. 9th ed. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, Iowa, USA. 113–147.Amstel S Van (2010): Claw horn growth and wear rates, toe length, and claw size in commercial pigs: A pilot study. Journal of Swine Health and Production 18, 239–243.Anil Sukumarannair S., Anil Leena, Deen John (2005): Evaluation of patterns of removal and associations among culling because of lameness and sow productivity traits in swine breeding herds. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 226, 956-961 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2005.226.956Anil SS, Anil L, Deen J, Baidoo SK, Walker RD (2007): Factors associated with claw lesions in gestating sows. Journal of Swine Health and Production 15, 78–83.Anil Sukumarannair S., Anil Leena, Deen John (2009): Effect of lameness on sow longevity. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 235, 734-738 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.235.6.734Berghaus Roy D., Lombard Jason E., Gardner Ian A., Farver Thomas B. (2005): Factor analysis of a Johne's disease risk assessment questionnaire with evaluation of factor scores and a subset of original questions as predictors of observed clinical paratuberculosis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 72, 291-309 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.07.011Carrel Margaret, Voss Paul, Streatfield Peter K, Yunus Mohammad, Emch Michael (2010): Protection from annual flooding is correlated with increased cholera prevalence in Bangladesh: a zero-inflated regression analysis. Environmental Health, 9, 13- https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-9-13Clowes EJ, Aherne FX, Foxcroft GR, Baracos VE (2003): Selective protein loss in lactating sows is associated with reduced litter growth and ovarian function. Journal of Animal Science 81, 753–764.Dewey CE, Friendship RM, Wilson MR (1993): Clinical and postmortem examination of sows culled for lameness. Canadian Veterinary Journal 34, 555–556.Dohoo I.R., Ducrot C., Fourichon C., Donald A., Hurnik D. (1997): An overview of techniques for dealing with large numbers of independent variables in epidemiologic studies. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 29, 221-239 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(96)01074-4Engblom L., Lundeheim N., Strandberg E., del P. Schneider M., Dalin A.-M., Andersson K. (2007): Factors affecting length of productive life in Swedish commercial sows. Journal of Animal Science, 86, 432-441 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0310Enokida M., Sasaki Y., Hoshino Y., Saito H., Koketsu Y. (2011): Claw lesions in lactating sows on commercial farms were associated with postural behavior but not with suboptimal reproductive performance or culling risk. Livestock Science, 136, 256-261 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.09.017Fitzgerald Robert F., Stalder Kenneth J., Karriker Locke A., Sadler Lawrence J., Hill Howard T., Kaisand Jeffery, Johnson Anna K. (2012): The effect of hoof abnormalities on sow behavior and performance. Livestock Science, 145, 230-238 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.02.009Foot First Team (2010): Foot First swine claw lesion identification. Retrieved March 20, 2013, from: http://www.zinpro.com/lameness/swine/lesion-identification.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989): 4.2 Model building strategies and methods for logistic regression. In: Barnett V, Bradley RA, Hunter JS, Kadane JB, Kendall DG, Smith AFM, Stigler SM, Watson GS (eds.): Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley, New York, 86 pp.Johnson RW (1997): Inhibition of growth by pro-inflammatory cytokines: An integrated view. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1244−1255.Kempson S., Logue D. (1993): Ultrastructural observations of hoof horn from dairy cows: changes in the white line during the first lactation. Veterinary Record, 132, 524-527 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.132.21.524King R. H., Dunkin A. C. (1986): The effect of nutrition on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows 3. The response to graded increases in food intake during lactation. Animal Production, 42, 119-125 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100017803Koketsu Y, Dial GD, Pettigrew JE, King VL (1996): Feed intake pattern during lactation and subsequent reproductive performance of sows. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2875−2884.KRONEMAN A., VELLENGA L., WILT F.J., VERMEER H. M. (1993): Field Research on Veterinary Problems in Group-Housed Sows - A Survey of Lameness. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A, 40, 704-712 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.1993.tb00687.xLisgara M, Skampardonis V, Kouroupides S, Leontides L (2015): Hoof lesions and lameness in sows of three Greek swine herds. Journal of Swine Health and Production, accepted.Long J, Freese J (eds.) (2006): 8.6 Zero inflated count models. In:Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. 2nd ed. College Station, Stata Press, Texas. 396−409.Lord Dominique, Washington Simon, Ivan John N. (2007): Further notes on the application of zero-inflated models in highway safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39, 53-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.06.004Mejia-Guadarrama CA, Psquier A, Dourmad JY, Prunier A, Quesnel H (2002): Protein (lysine) restriction in primiparous lactating sows: Effects on metabolic state, somatotropic axis and reproductive performance after weaning. Journal of Animal Science 80, 3286−3300.Mickey RM, Greenland S (1989): The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. American Journal of Epidemiology 129, 125−137.Pluym L, Van Nuffel A, Dewulf J, Cools A, Vangroenweghe F, Van Hoorebeke S, Maes D (2011): Prevalence and risk factors of claw lesions and lameness in pregnant sows in two types of group housing. Veterinarni Medicina 56, 101–109.Pluym L. M., Van Nuffel A., Van Weyenberg S., Maes D. (2013): Prevalence of lameness and claw lesions during different stages in the reproductive cycle of sows and the impact on reproduction results. animal, 7, 1174-1181 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113000232Polson D., Dial G., Marsh W. (1993): A biological and financial characterization of non-productive days. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 16, 51-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(93)90013-JQuesnel H, Pasquier A, Mounier AM, Prunier A (1998): Influence of feed restriction during lactation on gonadotropic hormones and ovarian development in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science 76, 856−863.Stevens J (ed.) (1996): Confirmatory and Exploratory Factor Analysis. Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. 3rd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey. 366 pp.Tantasuparuk W, Lundeheim N, Dalin A-M, Kunavongkrit A, Einarsson S (2000): Reproductive performance of purebred Landrace and Yorkshire sows in Thailand with special reference to seasonal influence and parity number. Theriogenology, 54, 481-496 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00364-2Welfare Quality® (2009): Welfare Quality Assessment Protocol for Pigs (sows and piglets, growing and finishing pigs). Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad. The Netherlands. 122 pp.