Effects of bromelain supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, faecal microbial shedding, faecal score and faecal noxious gas emission in weanling pigs

https://doi.org/10.17221/8493-VETMEDCitation:Hossain M.M., Lee S.I., Kim I.H. (2015): Effects of bromelain supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, faecal microbial shedding, faecal score and faecal noxious gas emission in weanling pigs. Veterinarni Medicina, 60: 544-552.
download PDF

A total of 140 weanling pigs [(Yorkshire × Landrace) × Duroc] with an average body weight (b.w.) of 6.75 ± 1.48 kg were used in a six-week trial. Pigs were randomly allotted to one of four experimental treatments according to their initial b.w. (seven pens per treatment with five pigs per pen). Dietary treatments were: CON = control diet, T1 = CON + 0.05% bromelain, T2 = CON + 0.10% bromelain, T3 = CON + 0.20% bromelain. The experiment was divided into two phases (Days 1 to 14 and Days 15 to 42). All diets, in mash form, were formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements (NRC, 2012) for weanling pigs. Feed intake and b.w. were monitored at the end of each phase. T3 treatment had greater (342 vs. 305 g; 409 vs. 387 g; P < 0.05) average daily gain (ADG) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) than CON treatment in Phase 1. In Phase 2, the ADG was improved (from T1 to T3: 612, 616, 637 vs. 583 g; P < 0.05) in all bromelain treatments compared with CON treatment, ADFI and growth efficiency (G : F) ratio of T3 treatment were higher (833 vs. 803 g; 0.765 vs. 0.726 g; P < 0.05) compared with CON treatment. Overall, T3 treatment showed greater (539 vs. 490 g; 691 vs. 664 g; P < 0.05) ADG and ADFI than CON. Moreover, pigs fed bromelain diets exhibited increased (0.769, 0.770, 0.780 vs. 0.738; P < 0.05) G : F ratios compared with those fed CON diet. Pigs fed bromelain diets exhibited increased (two weeks: 79.06, 79.97, 79.42 vs. 77.98%; 78.51, 78.86, 78.43 vs. 75.69%; six weeks: 74.49, 74.67, 75.02 vs. 72.70 %; 69.43, 70.78, 71.32 vs. 73.39%; P < 0.05) apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter and nitrogen compared with those fed CON diet at Week 2 and Week 6. On Day 42, the blood creatinine in the CON group was higher (1.30 vs. 1.04, 0.97, 0.88 mg/dl; P < 0.05) compared with the bromelain treatment groups. Faecal E. coli counts were decreased (6.22 vs. 6.41 log10 cfu/g; P < 0.05) in T2 treatment compared with CON treatment. The faecal ammonia (NH3) gas emission in T2 and T3 treatments decreased (17.72, 17.33 vs. 22.95 ppm; P < 0.05) compared with CON. In conclusion, dietary supplementation with 0.2% bromelain has here been shown to improve the growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter and N and to decrease E. coli and faecal NH3 gas emission in weanling pigs.

AOAC (1995): Official method of analysis. 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
Barton Mary D. (2000): Antibiotic use in animal feed and its impact on human healt. Nutrition Research Reviews, 13, 279-  https://doi.org/10.1079/095442200108729106
Chandler D S, Mynott T L (1998): Bromelain protects piglets from diarrhoea caused by oral challenge with K88 positive enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Gut, 43, 196-202  https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.43.2.196
Chandler David S., Mynott Tracey L., Luke Richard K.J., Craven John A. (1994): The distribution and stability of Escherichia coli K88 receptor in the gastrointestinal tract of the pig. Veterinary Microbiology, 38, 203-215  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(94)90002-7
Close WH (2000): Producing pigs without antibiotic growth promoters. Advances in Pork Production 11, 47–56.
Drummond JG, Curtis SE, Simon J, Norton HW (1980): Effects of aerial ammonia on growth and health of young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 50, 1085–1091.
Eckert K, Grabowska E, Stange R, Schneider U, Eschmann K, Maurer H R (1999): Effects of oral bromelain administration on the impaired immunocytotoxicity of mononuclear cells from mammary tumor patients.. Oncology Reports, , -  https://doi.org/10.3892/or.6.6.1191
FENTON T. W., FENTON MIRJANA (1979): AN IMPROVED PROCEDURE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF CHROMIC OXIDE IN FEED AND FECES. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 59, 631-634  https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas79-081
Ferket PR, van Heugten E, van Kempen TATG, Angel R (2002): Nutritional strategies to reduce environmental emissions from nonruminants. Journal of Animal Science 80, E168–E182.
Greenberg DM (1955): Plant proteolytic enzymes. In: Colowick SP, Kaplan NO (eds.): Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press Inc., New York. 1, 54–64.
Hahn TW, Lohakare JD, Lee SL, Moon WK, Chae BJ (2006): Effects of supplementation of β-glucans on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and immunity in weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1422–1428.
Hale Laura P., Greer Paula K., Trinh Chau T., James Cindy L. (2005): Proteinase activity and stability of natural bromelain preparations. International Immunopharmacology, 5, 783-793  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2004.12.007
Hinton M, Kaukas A, Linton AH (1986): The ecology of drug resistance in enteric bacteria. Journal of Applied Bacteriology Symposium Supplement 15, 77–92.
Knill-Jones R. P., Pearce H., Batten J., Williams R. (1970): Comparative Trial of Nutrizym in Chronic Pancreatic Insufficiency. BMJ, 4, 21-24  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.4.5726.21
Larson L.L., Owen F.G., Albright J.L., Appleman R.D., Lamb R.C., Muller L.D. (1977): Guidelines Toward More Uniformity in Measuring and Reporting Calf Experimental Data. Journal of Dairy Science, 60, 989-991  https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(77)83975-1
Livio M, De Gaetano G, Donati MB (1978): Effect of bromelain of fibrinogen level, prothrombin complex and platelet aggregation in the rat – a preliminary report. Drugs under Experimental and Clinical Research 1, 49–53.
Maurer H.R. (2001): Bromelain: biochemistry, pharmacology and medical use. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 58, 1234-1245  https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00000936
MINAMI Yoshinobu, DOI Etsushiro, HATA Tadao (1971): Fractionation, Purification and Some Properties of Proteolytic Enzymes from Stem Bromelain. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 35, 1419-1430  https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb1961.35.1419
Mondal S, Bhattacharya S, Pandey JN, Biswas M (2011): Evaluation of acute anti-inflammatory effect of Ananas comosus leaf extract in Rats. Pharmacology Online 3, 1312–1315.
Moss IN, Frazier CV, Martin GJ (1963): Bromelain – the pharmacology of the enzyme. Archives of International Pharmacody 145, 166–189.
Mynott T L, Luke R K, Chandler D S (1996): Oral administration of protease inhibits enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli receptor activity in piglet small intestine.. Gut, 38, 28-32  https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.38.1.28
Mynott TL, Ladhams A, Scarmato P, Engwerda CR (1999): Bromelain, from pineapple stems, proteolytically blocks activation of extracellular regulated kinase-2 in T cells. Journal of Immunology 163, 2568–2575.
Natalucci CL, Priolo NS, Buttazzoni MS, Caffini NO (1985):Separation, fractionation and characterisation of a protein isolated from fruits of Bromelia hieronymi, Mez. Acta Farmaceutica Bonaerense 4, 93–98.
Neubauer RA (1961): A plant protease for potentiation of and possible replacement of antibiotics. Experimental Medicine and Surgery 19, 143–160.
NRC (2012): Nutrient Requirement of Swine, 11th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Renzini G, Varengo M (1972): Absorption of tetracycline in presence of bromelain after oral application (in German). Arzneimittel-Forschung 22, 410–412.
SAS (1996): SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. Version 7.0. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Taussig SJ, Yokoyama MM, Chinen A (1975): Bromelain: a proteolytic enzyme and its clinical application: a review. Hiroshima Journal of Medical Sciences 24, 185–193.
Van Beckhoven RF, Zenting HM, Maurer KH, Van Solingen P, Weiss A (1995): Bacillus cellulases and its application for detergents and textile treatment. European Patent 739, 982–988.
Wang Y., Cho J.H., Chen Y.J., Yoo J.S., Huang Y., Kim H.J., Kim I.H. (2009): The effect of probiotic BioPlus 2B® on growth performance, dry matter and nitrogen digestibility and slurry noxious gas emission in growing pigs. Livestock Science, 120, 35-42  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.04.018
Yan L., Kim I.H. (2013): Effect of probiotics supplementation in diets with different nutrient densities on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, faecal microbial population and faecal noxious gas content in growing pigs. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 41, 23-28  https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2012.739092
Zavadova Eva, Desser Lucia, Mohr Thomas (1995): Stimulation of Reactive Oxygen Species Production and Cytotoxicity in Human Neutrophils in vitro and after Oral Administration of a Polyenzyme Preparation. Cancer Biotherapy, 10, 147-152  https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.1995.10.147
Zhang Z. F., Kim I. H. (): Effects of multistrain probiotics on growth performance, apparent ileal nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, cecal microbial shedding, and excreta odor contents in broilers. Poultry Science, 93, 364-370  https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03314
Zhang Z.F., Cho J.H., Kim I.H. (2013): Effects of Bacillus subtilis UBT-MO2 on growth performance, relative immune organ weight, gas concentration in excreta, and intestinal microbial shedding in broiler chickens. Livestock Science, 155, 343-347  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.05.021
Zhao P. Y., Wang J. P., Kim I. H. (): Evaluation of dietary fructan supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, fecal microbial flora, and fecal noxious gas emission in finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 91, 5280-5286  https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5393
download PDF

© 2021 Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences | Prohlášení o přístupnosti