The association between the somatic cell count and isolated microorganisms during subclinical mastitis in heifers in Jordan
Alekish MOhttps://doi.org/10.17221/7980-VETMEDCitation:Alekish MO (2015): The association between the somatic cell count and isolated microorganisms during subclinical mastitis in heifers in Jordan. Veterinarni Medicina, 60: 71-76.
Mastitis is an important cause of early culling of dairy heifers. The aims of this study were to identify microorganisms that cause subclinical mastitis (SCM) in Holstein heifers in northern Jordan, to estimate the relative importance of various microorganisms, and to examine the correlation between the somatic cell count (SCC) and the isolated microorganisms. Composite milk samples were collected aseptically from 133 Holstein heifers between Days 5 and 14 postpartum for bacterial culture and somatic cell counts. The prevalence of subclinical mastitis in this study was 57.1%. Seventy six (76) of the 133 cows tested had SCC of > 250 000 cells/ml. Bacteria were isolated from 36 (27.1%) cows. About sixty six percent (66.7%) of these isolates were cultured from cows with subclinical mastitis. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS) were the most prevalent bacteria among isolates (50%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (22.2%), Corynebacterium bovis and coliforms (E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae) (5.6% each), and Streptococcus uberis (2.8%). Interestingly, the majority of the negative-culture samples (53.6%) had elevated SCC. All isolates except for the CNS group exhibited strongly elevated SCC (> 1 × 106cells/ml). However, the coagulase-negative Staphylococci did not have a distinct pattern with respect to SCCs. There was a strong correlation (P ≤ 0.05, correlation coefficient 0.213) between the results of bacterial culture (culture-positive vs. culture-negative) and SCC class but not between SCC class and the type of isolated bacteria. It is concluded that subclinical mastitis appears to be a significant health issue for dairy heifers in Jordan.Keywords:subclinical mastitis (SCM); somatic cell count (SCC); heifers; aetiology; prevalence; JordanReferences:
Alekish MO, Kenyon SJ (2006): A review of milking-machine-induced teat-end lesions and susceptibility to mastitis. Bovine Practitioner 40, 18–24.Alekish MO, Alshehabat MA, Abutarbush SM (2014): The prevalence and etiology of subclinical mastitis in Awassi sheep; emphasis on the relationship between the isolated organisms and the somatic cell count. European Journal of Veterinary Medicine 2014, 8. Available online at http://scik.org issn 2051-297x.Al-Majali Ahmad M, Jawabreh Sami (2003): Period prevalence and etiology of subclinical mastitis in Awassi sheep in southern Jordan. Small Ruminant Research, 47, 243-248 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00259-6Al-Tarazi YH, Chakiso AY, Lafi SQ (2011): Prevalence and distribution of bovine mastitis pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance in primiparous dairy heifers in Northern Jordan. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7, 529–539.Andersen S., Dohoo I.R., Olde Riekerink R., Stryhn H. (2010): Diagnosing intramammary infections: Evaluating expert opinions on the definition of intramammary infection using conjoint analysis. Journal of Dairy Science, 93, 2966-2975 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2726Archer S.C., Mc Coy F., Wapenaar W., Green M.J. (2013): Association between somatic cell count early in the first lactation and the longevity of Irish dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 2939-2950 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6115Barkema HW, Schukken YH, Lam TJGM, Beiboer ML, Benedictus G, Brand A (1999a): Management practices associated with the incidence rate of clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 1643–1654.Barkema HW, Deluyker HA, Schukken YH, Lam TJGM (1999b): Quarter-milk somatic cell count at calving and at the first six milkings after calving. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 38, 1–9.Bowers Susan, Gandy Scott, Graves Kenneth, Eicher Susan, Willard Scott (2006): Effects of prepartum milking on postpartum reproduction, udder health and production performance in first-calf dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Research, 73, 257- https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029906001762Compton C, McDougall S (2008): Heifer mastitis – A review of recent studies. Proceedings of the Society of Dairy Cattle Veterinarians of the NZVA, 77–90.De Vliegher S, Laevens H, Opsomer G, De Muelenaere E, De Kruif A (2001): Somatic cell counts in dairy heifers during early lactation. Vlaams Diergeneeskunding Tijdschrift 70, 212–215.De Vliegher S, Barkema HW, Stryhn H, Opsomer G, De Kruif A (2005a): Impact of early lactation somatic cell count in heifers on milk yield over the first lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 938–947.De Vliegher S, Barkema HW, Opsomer G, De Kruif A, Duchateau L (2005b): Association between somatic cell count in early lactation and culling of dairy heifers using Cox frailty models. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 560–568.De Vliegher S., Fox L.K., Piepers S., McDougall S., Barkema H.W. (2012): Invited review: Mastitis in dairy heifers: Nature of the disease, potential impact, prevention, and control. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 1025-1040 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-4074DOS – Department of Statistics (2014): http://www.dos.gov.jo/dos_home_e/main/agriculture/census/tables/tab7_7.pdf Access date, March 1st, 2014. Amman, Jordan.Embert HC (ed.) (1986): Mastitis diagnosis. In: Veterinary Clinical Pathology. Saunders, Philadelphia. 395–453.Erskine RJ (2011): Mastitis in cattle. Merck Veterinary Manual. Merck & Co., New York. 1010–1015.FOX L (2009): Prevalence, incidence and risk factors of heifer mastitis. Veterinary Microbiology, 134, 82-88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.005Godden S., Bey R., Lorch K., Farnsworth R., Rapnicki P. (2008): Ability of Organic and Inorganic Bedding Materials to Promote Growth of Environmental Bacteria. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 151-159 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0415Hariharan H, Donachie W, Macaldowie C, Keefe G (2004): Bacteriology and somatic cell counts in milk samples from ewes on a Scottish farm. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 68, 188–192.Hawari Azmi D., Al-Dabbas Fawzi (2008): Prevalence and Distribution of Mastitis Pathogens and their Resistance Against Antimicrobial Agents in Dairy Cows in Jordan. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 3, 36-39 https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2008.36.39Hogan JS, Gonzalez RN, Harmon RJ, Nickerson SC, Oliver SP, Pankey JW, Smith KL (1999): Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. Rev. ed. NMC Inc., Madison, WI.Lafi S.Q. (2006): Use of somatic cell counts and California Mastitis Test results from udder halves milk samples to detect subclinical intramammary infection in Awassi sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 62, 83-86 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.035Lafi SQ, Hailat NQ (1998a): Bovine and ovine mastitis in dulail valley of Jordan. Veterinariski Arhiv 68, 51–57.Lafi SQ, Hailat NQ (1998b): Incidence and antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria causing bovine and ovine clinical mastitis in Jordan. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 18, 88–94.Lafi S., Al-Rawashdeh O., Na'Was T., Hailat N. (1994): National cross-sectional study of mastitis in dairy cattle in Jordan. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 26, 168-174 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02241077NICKERSON S (2009): Control of heifer mastitis: Antimicrobial treatment—An overview. Veterinary Microbiology, 134, 128-135 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.019Nickerson S.C., Owens W.E., Boddie R.L. (1995): Mastitis in Dairy Heifers: Initial Studies on Prevalence and Control. Journal of Dairy Science, 78, 1607-1618 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76785-6NMC – National Mastitis Council (1997): A Look at Physiological and Regulatory SCC Standards in Milk. NMC Newsletter Udder Topics.Oliver S.P., Lewis M.J., Gillespie B.E., Dowlen H.H., Jaenicke E.C., Roberts R.K. (2003): Prepartum Antibiotic Treatment of Heifers: Milk Production, Milk Quality and Economic Benefit. Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 1187-1193 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73702-3Oliver SP, Gonzales RN, Hogan JS, Jayarao BM, Owens WE (2004): Microbiological Procedures for the Diagnosis of Bovine Udder Infection. 4th ed. National Mastitis Council, Inc.Madison, WI.Quinn P, Carter E, Morley B, Carter R (eds.) (1994): California Mastitis Test (CMT). In: Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. 1st ed. Wolfe Publishing, London. 333–334.Rupp R, Beaudeau F, Boichard D (2000): Relationship between milk somatic-cell counts in the first lactation and clinical mastitis occurrence in the second lactation of French Holstein cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 46, 99-111 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00142-2Santman-Berends I.M.G.A., Olde Riekerink R.G.M., Sampimon O.C., van Schaik G., Lam T.J.G.M. (2012): Incidence of subclinical mastitis in Dutch dairy heifers in the first 100 days in lactation and associated risk factors. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 2476-2484 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4766Sears M, Gonzalez N, Wilson J, Han R (1993): Procedures for mastitis diagnosis and control. Veterinary Clinics of North America, Food Animal Practice 9, 445–468.Seegers Henri, Fourichon Christine, Beaudeau Fran�ois (2003): Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Veterinary Research, 34, 475-491 https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2003027Valde JP, Lawson LG, Lindberg A, Agger JF, Saloniemi H, Osteras O (2004): Cumulative risk of bovine mastitis treatments in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 45, 201–210.https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-45-201Waage S., Skei H.R., Rise J., Rogdo T., Sviland S., Ødegaard S.A. (2000): Outcome of Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Heifers Assessed by Reexamination of Cases One Month After Treatment. Journal of Dairy Science, 83, 70-76 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74857-0Waage S., Ødegaard S.A., Lund A., Brattgjerd S., Røthe T. (2001): Case-Control Study of Risk Factors for Clinical Mastitis in Postpartum Dairy Heifers. Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 392-399 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74489-X