Closure of a recurrent bladder rupture in a calf by means of a peritoneal flap: a case report
M. Gandini, G. Giusto, F. Comino, M. Casalone, C. Bellinohttps://doi.org/10.17221/8825-VETMEDCitation:Gandini M., Giusto G., Comino F., Casalone M., Bellino C. (2016): Closure of a recurrent bladder rupture in a calf by means of a peritoneal flap: a case report. Veterinarni Medicina, 61: 229-232.
An 11-month old, Piedmontese bullock was admitted to the Department of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, for urolithiasis and suspected uroperitoneum owing to urinary bladder rupture. A first episode of uroperitoneum had been treated surgically one week previously. On admission, the animal underwent physical and haematological examination, followed by transabdominal ultrasonography and biochemical screening. Clinical and laboratory findings confirmed the recurrence of uroperitoneum, possibly secondary to the previously failed surgical approach. During surgery, urine leakage from the previously treated tear was clearly visible, together with a large necrotic area surrounding the tear. To close the defect, we created a peritoneal flap. For tissue approximation we used a continuous barbed suture material, which obviated the need for knots to secure the leading and terminal ends of the suture. Postoperative monitoring included transabdominal ultrasonography and biochemical profile tests, performed at 10 and 30 days after surgery. Two months after discharge, a telephone follow-up confirmed the positive outcome of the procedure. The creation of a peritoneal flap allows for effective sealing of a bladder tear with necrotic edges. The use of barbed suture greatly simplifies the entire procedure.Keywords:
calf; soft tissue surgery; bladder surgery; peritoneal flapReferences:
Boure Ludovic P., Kerr Carolyn L., Pearce Simon G., John Runciman R., Lansdowne Jennifer L., Caswell Jeff L. (2005): Comparison of Two Laparoscopic Suture Patterns for Repair of Experimentally Ruptured Urinary Bladders in Normal Neonatal Calves. Veterinary Surgery, 34, 47-54 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00009.xClose C.E., Dewan P.A., Ashwood P.J., Byard R.J., Mitchell M.E. (2001): Autoaugmentation peritoneocystoplasty in a sheep model. BJU International, 88, 414-417 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.02352.xClose Clare E., Anderson Paul D., Edwards Glenn A., Mitchell Michael E., Dewan Paddy A. (2004): Autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty: further studies of the sheep model. BJU International, 94, 658-662 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05018.xELBAHNASY A, SHALHAV A, HOENIG D, FIGENSHAU R, CLAYMAN R (1998): BLADDER WALL SUBSTITUTION WITH SYNTHETIC AND NON-INTESTINAL ORGANIC MATERIALS. The Journal of Urology, 159, 628-637 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63690-5Fubini SL, Ducharme N (2004): Urolithiasis. In: Fubini SL, Ducharme N (eds): Farm Animal Surgery. WB Saunders, St. Louis, Missouri. 534–535.Nemecek Elena, Negrin Lukas, Beran Claudia, Nemecek Romina, Hollinsky Christian (2013): The application of the V-Loc closure device for gastrointestinal sutures: a preliminary study. Surgical Endoscopy, 27, 3830-3834 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2982-8